medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Interna de México

Colegio de Medicina Interna de México.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Med Int Mex 2020; 36 (1)

Who is responsible for undergraduate and postgraduate learning in medicine?

Rodríguez-Weber FL
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 83-89
PDF size: 179.98 Kb.


Key words:

Teaching, Responsibilities.

ABSTRACT

Time we live in does not allow to the educational process remain static, generating to those involved roles other than those referred to in the traditional teaching and increasing responsibilities different from each of the participants.


REFERENCES

  1. Dhaliwal U. A prospective study of medical students’ perspective of teaching-learning media: reiterating the importance of feedback. J Indian Med Assoc 2007;105(11):612- 636.

  2. Whitehead D, Wang Y, Wang J, Zahang J, Sun Z, Xie C. Health promotion and health education practice: nurses’ perceptions. J Adv Nurs 2008;61(2):181-187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2648.2007.04479.x.

  3. Schonrock Adema J, Heijne Penninga M, van Duijn MA, Geertsman J, Cohen Schotanus J. Assessment of professional behaviour in undergraduate medical education: peer assessment enhances performance. Med Educ 2007;41(9):836-842. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2923.2007.02817.x.

  4. Colliver J. A. Educational theory and medical education practice: A cautionary note for medical school faculty. Acad Med 2002;77:1217-1220. DOI: 10.1097/00001888- 200212000-00012.

  5. Mvududu N. Constructivism in the statistics classroom: from theory to practice. Teaching Statistics 2005;27(2):49- 54.

  6. Priest HM, Roberts P, Dent H, Blicoe C, Lawton D, Armstrong C. Interprofessional education and working in mental health: in search of the evidence base. J Nurs Manag 2008;16(4):474-485. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2834.2008.00867.x.

  7. Hrabak M, Vujaklija A, Vodopivec I, Hren D, Marusic M, Marusic A. Academic misconduct among medical students in a post-communist country. Ned Educ 2004;38(3):276- 285. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01766.x.

  8. Rennie SC, Rudland JR. Differences in medical students’ attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behavior across the years-a questionnaire study. J Med Ethics 2003;29(2):97-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ jme.29.2.97.

  9. Hoat LN, Son NM, Wright EP. Perceptions of graduating students from eight medical schools in Vietnam on acquisitions of key skills identified by teachers. BMC Med Educ 2008;20:8-15. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-5.

  10. Eyal L, Cohen R. Preparation for clinical practice: a survey of medical students’ and graduates’ perceptions of the effectiveness of their medical school curriculum. Med Teach 2006;28(6):162-170. DOI: 10.1080/01421590600776578.

  11. Ward JP, Gordon J, Field MJ, Lehmann HP. Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet 2001;357(9258):792-796. DOI: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(00)04173-8.

  12. Rodriguez Weber FL. ¿Cómo enseñar y como aprender en las residencias mèdicas?. Med Int Mex 2012;28(1):65-66.

  13. Ogur B, Hirsh D, Krupat E, Bor D. The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge integrated clerkship: an innovative model of clinical education. Acad Med 2007;82(4):397-404. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803338f0.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Int Mex. 2020;36