medigraphic.com
ISSN 2174-0798 (Print)
Organo oficial de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Odontopediatría (ALOP)

2017, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odotopediatr Latinoam 2017; 7 (2)

In vitro evaluation of surface roughness and color alteration of two types of glass ionomers, after being subjected to different beverages

Carrillo TM, Ugarte NDE, Benitez CABCE, Nelson FP

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 74-92
PDF size: 505.91 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the surface roughness and discoloration of two types of glass ionomer had been subjected to different solutions. In a matrix of Teflon (8x2mm), 60 test bodies were prepared with 2 types of resin modified glass ionomers: 30 for Fuji II LC® (M1) and the other 30 for Ketac N100® (M2). The apparatus was Freelight two 3M ESPE Elipar. Photopolymerization was carried out for 20 second each test body. After the preparation, the seventy-two specimens were kept in gauze soaked for 24 hours in an oven at 37°C and then were sorted and divided into three groups of 12 each to be subjected, for 90 seconds each day at 3 different types of solutions: distilled water (S1), carbonated beverage (S2) and citrus juice (S3) for 14 days. Readings from discoloration, obtained through a colorimeter, and the surface roughness made using the profilometer were performed after 48 hours (T0) and after day 14 (T1). The results were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05). The results showed that: a) The carbonated beverage (S2) had higher mean discoloration (ΔE *) compared to the other solutions, b) Ketac N100®(M2) had higher mean with respect to the interaction surface roughness material solution. Therefore, it was concluded that certain period of time elapsed aesthetic properties and physico-mechanical properties of the material studied are affected.


REFERENCES

  1. Ozdemir-Ozenen D, Sungurtekin E, Issever H, Sandalli N. Surface roughness of fluoride-releasing restorative materials after topical fluoride application. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(1):68-72.

  2. Bala O, Arisu HD, Yikilgan I, Arslan S, Gullu A. Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements. Eur J Dent. 2012; 6(1):79-86.

  3. Nakajo K, Imazato S, Takahashi Y, Kiba W, Ebisu S, Takahashi N. Fluoride released from glass-ionomer cement is responsible to inhibit the acid production of caries-related oral streptococci. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(6): 703-8.

  4. Ling L, Xu X, Choi GY, Billodeaux D, Guo G, Diwan RM. Novel F-releasing composite with improved mechanical properties. J Dent Res. 2009 1;88(1):83-8.

  5. Anusavice KJ, Zhang NZ, Shen C. Controlled release of chlorhexidine from UDMA-TEGDMA resin. J Dent Res. 2006 Oct 1;85(10):950-4.

  6. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007 Mar 31;23(3):343-62.

  7. Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Neves AA, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(11): 1347-57.

  8. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(9): 864-81.

  9. Xu HH, Moreau JL, Sun L, Chow LC. Novel CaF2 nanocomposite with high strength and fluoride ion release. J Dent Res. 2010; 89(7): 739-45.

  10. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. JADA. 2003; 134(10): 1382-90.

  11. Korkmaz Y, Gurgan S, Firat E, Nathanson D. Shear bond strength of three different nano-restorative materials to dentin. Oper Dent. 2010 Jan;35(1):50-7.

  12. Carvalho FG, Sampaio CS, Fucio SB, Carlo HL, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM. Effect of chemical and mechanical degradation on surface roughness of three glass ionomers and a nanofilled resin composite. Oper Dent. 2012; 37(5): 509-17.

  13. De Oliveira AL, Garcia PP, Santos PA, Campos JÁ. Surface roughness and hardness of a composite resin: influence of finishing and polishing and immersion methods. Mat Res. 2010 Sep;13(3):409-15.

  14. Dorini, A.L. Avaliação da pigmentação superficial por café e vino em compositos odontologicos. Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba. Universidad Estadual de Campinas. 2001. Tesis doctoral en Clinica Odontologica. Disponible en internet:

  15. Yousef M, Abo El Naga A. Color stability of different restoratives after exposure to coloring agents. J Am Sci. 2012;8:20-6.

  16. Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2010 Jul 31;26(7):659-65.

  17. Sidhu, S. K. Clinical evaluations of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Dent Mater 2010; 26 (1): 7-12.

  18. Hamouda IM. Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2011; 23(5): 315-22.

  19. Lee YK, El Zawahry M, Noaman KM, Powers JM. Effect of mouthwash and accelerated aging on the color stability of esthetic restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2000; 13(3): 159-61.

  20. Mohan M, Shey Z, Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK, Munisamy S, Janal M. Color changes of restorative materials exposed in vitro to cola beverage. Ped Dent. 2008; 30(4): 309-16.

  21. Lussi A, Kohler N, Zero D, Schaffner M, Megert B. A comparison of the erosive potential of different beverages in primary and permanent teeth using an in vitro model. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000; 108(2): 110-4.

  22. Ahmed KI, Sajjan G. Color stability of ionomer and resin composite restoratives in various environmental solutions: An invitro reflection spectrophotometric study. J Conserv Dent. 2005; 8(1): 45.

  23. Noie F, O'Keefe KL, Powers JM. Color stability of resin cements after accelerated aging. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8(1): 51-5.

  24. Yap AU, Sim CP, Loganathan V. Color stability of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Oper Dent. 2001; 26(6): 591-6.

  25. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2005; 33(5): 389-98.

  26. Godoi AP. Efeito in situ da associação de chá preto ao uso diário de clorexidina na alteração de cor e rugosidade superficial de resinas compostas (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo).

  27. Badra VV, Faraoni JJ, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2005; 30(2): 213-9.

  28. Abu-bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Changes in the mechanical properties and surface texture of compomer immersed in various media. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84(4): 444-52.

  29. Briso AL, Caruzo LP, Guedes AP, Catelan A, Santos PD. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness and microhardness of restorative materials submitted to erosive challenges. Oper Dent. 2011; 36(4): 397-402.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com