2018, Number 19
<< Back Next >>
Rev Tame 2018; 6.7 (19)
Asociación entre arcos dentarios con el perfil, biotipo facial y la clase esquelética en una población de Tabasco
Martínez BLK, Lehmann MJM, Rueda VMA
Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 716-722
PDF size: 227.03 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The analysis of the clinical and radiographic elements is fundamental part of the adequate orthodontic diagnosis. The interrelation of dental arches, profile, facial biotype and skeletal class, will favor the choice of the most convenient treatment that generates pleasant, functional and stable results in the long term.
Objective: Determine if there is association between dental arches with the profile, facial biotype and skeletal class in patients of the Juchimán II Clinic, UJAT.
Materials and Methods: An observational, analytical and retrospective study with quantitative method, the sample was selected for convenience, evaluating 120 patients that met the established selection criteria. The dental arch was selected using Orthoform 3MUnitek templates, to obtain biotype Vert analysis was performed by lateral skull radiographs, facial profile with facial convexity angle was determined from profile photographs and skeletal class with Steiner ANB angle.
Results. The most prevalent upper and lower dental arches were ovoid. The association between dental arches, profile, facial biotype and skeletal class was determined through the xi
2 test, with no statistically significant relationship (p› 0.05).
Conclusion. It is concluded that there is no association between the variables studied, because a certain form of dental arch is not specific to any profile, facial biotype or skeletal class. At present there is not yet a universal consensus on this relationship, however, these elements condition the treatment and mark the best way to meet the objectives posed with each patient, so they are indispensable in the correct orthodontic diagnosis.
REFERENCES
Mendoza PA, Gutiérrez JF. Forma del arco dental en ortodoncia. Rev Tamé. 2015;3(9): 327-333.
Sanchez MA, Yañez EE. Asociación entre el biotipo facial y la sobremordida. Estudio piloto. RevEstomatol Herediana. 2015;25(1):5-11.
Sosa RP. Prevalencia de la forma de los arcos dentales, con maloclusión I,II, III previo a tratamiento ortodóncico, en pacientes comprendidos entre 13 y 30 años. Universidad Mayor de San Andrés; 2014.
Orozco L, González V, Nácar M, Santillán NP, Sánchez CL, Moreno W. Forma de los arcos dentales en pacientes atendidos en la clínica multidisciplinaria Zaragoza. Rev Esp Cien Salud. 2011;14(2):82-87.
Murshid ZA. Patterns of Dental Arch Form in the Different Classes of Malocclusion. J Am Sc. 2012;8(10):308-312.
Bayome M, Sameshima G, Kim Y, Nojima K, Baek S, Kook Y. Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2011;139(3):245-252.
Toodehzaeim M, Mostafavi S. Dental Arch Morphology in Iranian Population. Iran J Ortho. 2016 Sept;11(2):e5863.
Muhamad A, Nezar W, Azzaldeen A. The curve of dental arch in normal occlusion. Open Sc J Clin Med. 2015;3(2):47-54.
Silva I, Hidalgo A, Estrada J, Fernández JC, Uribe L, Contreras A, et. al. Analysis of genomic diversity in Mexican Mestizo populations to develop genomic medicine in Mexico. PNAS. 2009;106(21):8611-8616.
Nojima K, McLaughlin R, Isshiki Y, Sinclair P. A Comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese Mandibular Clinical Arch Forms. Angle Orthod. 2001;71(3):195-200.
Ling J, Wong R. Dental Arch Widths of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(1): 54-63.
Agurto P, Sandoval P. Morfología del arco maxilar y mandibular en niños de ascendencia Mapuche y no Mapuche. Int. J. Morphol. 2011;29(4):1104-1108.
Llanes M, Jiménez MN, Bravo ME. Morfología Craneofacial y su relación con la forma y ancho del arco dentario maxilar en estudiantes entre 13 y 16 años de la ciudad de Cuenca. Rev Lation Ortodon Odontop.2014;2(3):124-129.
Khera AK, Singh GK, Sharma VP, Singh A. Relationship between dental arch dimensions and vertical facial morphology in Class I subjects. J IndOrthod Soc. 2012;46(4):316-324.
Ribeiro JS, Ambrosio AR, Santos A, Shimizu IA, Shimizu RH. Evaluation of transverse changes in the dental arches according to growth pattern: a longitudinal study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012 Ene-Feb;17(1):66-73.
Jumani SS, Gul E, Ahmed I. Correlation of vertical facial morphology and dental arch width in untreated pakistani adults. Int J Dent Health Sci. 2014;1(6):890-899.
Miller SF, Vela KC, Levy SM, Southard TE, Gratton DG, Moreno LM. Patterns of morphological integration in the dental arches of individuals with malocclusion. Am J Hum Biol. 2016;28(1):879–889.
Acosta D, Porras A, Moreno F. Relación entre la forma del contorno facial, los arcos dentarios e incisivos centrales superiores en estudiantes de odontología de la Universidad del Valle en Cali. Rev. Estomat. 2011;19(1):8-13.
Olmez S, Dogan S. Comparison of the arch forms and dimensions in various malocclusions of the Turkish population. Open Journal of Stomatology. 2011;1:158-164.
Saleem T, Shafique A, Chattha MR. Arch form analyses: A comparison of two different methods.Pak Oral Dent J. 2011;31(2):347-351.
Gallardo R. ¿Consumimos los ortodoncistas en España la forma de arcada que más se adecúa a la de nuestros pacientes? Análisis comparativo de las distintas formas de arcada en el Mercado. Ortod. Esp. 2009;49(4):245-255.
Paranhos LR, Andrews WA, Jóias RP, Bérzin F, Daruge E, Triviño T. Dental arch morphology in normal occlusions. Braz J Oral Sci. 2011;9(4):481-487.
Ling J, Wong R. Dental Arch Widths of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(1): 54-63.
Politis G, Prates L, Pérez S. El Poblamiento de América. Arqueología y bioantropología de los primeros americanos. Colección Ciencia Joven 35, EUDEBA. 2009.
Pérez LB, Kú YG, Colomé GE, Santana AM. Correlación del perfil facial y los arcos dentarios en una población de Yucatán. RevMexOrtodon. 2016;4(2):84-87.
Lara E, González JC, Kubodera T, Montiel NM, Esquivel GI. Dental arch morphology of Mazahua and mestizo teenagers from central México. Braz J Oral Sci. 2009;8(2):92-6.
Pérez FS, Rivas R, Rojas A, Coyac R, Borbón C. Aplicación de método aritmético para la clasificación de la forma de arcadas dentales. Rev Odont Latinoam. 2010;2(1):5-8.
Bedoya A, Montoya J, González V, Tamayo JA, Martínez CH. Forma y tamaño del arco dental en poblaciones de tres ascendencias étnicas colombianas. Rev. CES Odont. 2016; 29(2):20-32.
Llanes M, Jiménez MN, Bravo ME. Morfología Craneofacial y su relación con la forma y ancho del arco dentario maxilar en estudiantes entre 13 y 16 años de la ciudad de Cuenca. Rev Lation Ortodon Odontop.2014;1(2):24-27.
Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod. 1993;103:299-312.
Anwar N, Fida M. Variability of arch forms in various vertical facial patterns. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010;20(9):565-570.
Zou W, Wu J, Jiang J, Xu T, Li C. Archform Comparisons between Skeletal Class II and III Malocclusions. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):1-7.