Ríos BA, Moreno MA, Badillo BM

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 267-275
PDF size: 390.21 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Rehabilitation of the maxillary anterior esthetic zone demands the adequate management of peri-implant soft tissues as well as the correct transfer by a true copy of the position of these tissues and their relationship with adjacent structures using an impression that will also need to be customized. The objective of this article is to present an alternative in the rehabilitation of implants by custom-made emergence profile to obtain better functional and esthetic results, but above all to maintain the position of peri-implants oft tissues.

REFERENCES

1. Rodríguez CG, Cárdenas ER, Cortés CD, Hernández SH, Sánchez AL. Rehabilitación estética con implantes en región edéntula anterior con reabsorción ósea. Rev Odontol Latinoam. 2008; 0 (1): 19-23.

2. Venegas JC, Landinez NS, Garzon AD. Generalidades de la interfase hueso-implante dental. Rev Cub Invest Biomed. 2009; 28 (3): 130-146.

3. Prasad DK, Shetty M, Bansal N, Hegde C. Platform switching: an answer to crestal bone loss. J Dent Implants. 2011; 1: 13-17.

4. Neblina NM, Marín GG. Immediate load implants with prosthetic rehabilitation supported by implants in the anterior area: Clinical case presentation. Rev Odont Mex. 2013; 17 (2): 97-102.

5. Collins CJR, García PS, Geraldino CMA, Polanco ART. Colocación de implantes y provisionalización inmediata en el sector estético: manejo quirúrgico y rehabilitador. Reporte de un caso clínico. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2014; 7 (2): 93-100.

6. Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: The pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 639-644.

7. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 43-61.

8. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol. 1992; 63: 995-996.

9. Castellanos SJL, López PRA, Fandiño TLA. Papila gingival. Aspectos biológicos en la conservación y predicción de su tamaño en la colocación de implantes dentales. Rev Mex Periodont. 2012; 3 (1): 10-14.

10. Su H, Gonzalez-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30 (4): 335-343.

11. Alonso R, Peláez J, Gómez P, Fraile C, Cárdenas E, Suárez MJ. Manejo del perfil de emergencia en el sector anterior. Gaceta Dental. 2013; 24 (249): 156-168.

12. Wang HL, Chan HL, Monje A, Steigmann M. Emergence profile design based on implant position in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34 (4): 559-563.

13. Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, Meltzer A, Porter S. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: Initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005; 17: 735-740.

14. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol. 2000; 71 (4): 546-549.

15. Siqueira S Jr, Pimentel SP, Alves RV, Sendyk W, Cury PR. Evaluation of the effects of buccal-palatal bone width on the incidence and height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants in esthetic areas. J Periodontol. 2013; 84 (2): 170-175.