medigraphic.com
ISSN 1405-8871 (Print)

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Aten Fam 2020; 27 (3)

Design and Evaluation of a Strategy for Teaching the Role of the Family in the Development of the Individual in Medical Students

Sauceda GJM, Zamora LB, Ortiz LS, Fouilloux MM, Micu IP

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 120-126
PDF size: 170.32 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: to design and evaluate a teaching strategy for medical students with the role of the family in the development of the individual, which promotes competition: “Critical thinking, clinical judgment, decision making and information management”. Methods: cross-sectional study. Teachers who were experts in the subject and in competencies carried out the design and elaboration of the teaching strategy. 138 first year of bachelor’s degree students and five professors from the Faculty of Medicine of the National Autonomous University of Mexico participated. Sampling was non-probabilistic by convenience. Participants assessed the effectiveness of the strategy for knowledge acquisition, as well as the skills and attitudes needed for the development of competition. Results: Teachers considered that the strategy favored the development of the first intermediate profile of the competition. Students noted that they achieved the learning goals, applying knowledge, and experiencing interest in the topic. Conclusions: the positive response of teachers and students to the strategy showed the need to implement teaching methods that promote active learning of the medical student, in order to obtain adequate training in psychological aspects of the family.


REFERENCES

  1. Membrillo A. Current status of family health in Mexico. Medwave [Internet]. [Citado 2019 Oct 15]; 13(1): e5616 doi: 10.5867/medwave. 2013.01.5616

  2. Razai MS. Communicating with patients´families and relatives: Do we need more training? Medical Teacher. 2018;40(8):870

  3. Sauceda GJM, Foncerrada MM. La exploración de la familia: aspectos médicos, psicológicos y sociales. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 1981;19:155- 63.

  4. Cid MC, Montes de Oca R, Hernandez O. La familia en el cuidado de la salud. Rev. Med. Electrón. 2014;36(4):462-472.

  5. Tandeter H, Carelli F, Timonen M, Javashvili G, Basak O, Wilm S, Zarbailov N, Spiegel W, Brekke M. A “minimal core curriculum” for Family Medicine in undergraduate medical education: A European Delphi survey among EURACT representatives. Eur J Gen Pract. 2011;17(4):217-220.

  6. Fasola OE, Alao AO, Ibisola BA, Obimakinde AM, Odekunle IC Knowledge and perception of Family Medicine among medical students at University of Ibadan, Nigeria, South African. Family Practice. 2019;61(5):197-202.

  7. Petek M, Švab I, Šter B. Prediction of intended career choice in family medicine using artificial neural networks. The European Journal of General Practice. 2015;21(1):63-69.

  8. Mahmoud M, Alaa M, Tawfik M, Salah M, Mohamed M, Medhat A. Family Medicine in Egypt from medical students’ perspective: A nationwide survey. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2015;27(3):264-273.

  9. Pi A M, Cobián A. Componentes de la función afectiva familiar: una nueva visión de sus dimensiones e interrelaciones. MEDISAN. 2009;13(6):4-7

  10. Bonal P, Gil V, Martín A, Pinto A. La medicina de familia como área de conocimiento. Aten Primaria. 1999; 23(3):151-74.

  11. Soler J, Rodríguez A, Ribera J, Peñascal E, Serna C, Martí RM. Medicina de Familia como asignatura obligatoria en el grado de medicina de la Universitat de Lleida: análisis de la percepción de los estudiantes. FEM. 2013;16(2):83-89.

  12. Post DM, Stone LC, Knutson DJ, Gutiérrez TL, Sari F, Hudson WA. Enhancing behavioral science education at the Ohio State University College of Medicine. Acad Med. 2008;83(1):28-36.

  13. Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. Plan de estudios 2010 y programas académicos de la licenciatura de médico cirujano [Internet]. [Citado 2019 Jul 22]. Disponible en: http://www.facmed.unam. mx/_documentos/planes/mc/PEFMUNAM.pdf

  14. Vest B, Lynch A, McGuigan D, Servoss T, Zinnerstrom K, Symons A. “Using standardized patient encounters to teach longitudinal continuity of care in a family medicine clerkship.” BMC Medical Education. 2016;16(1):208.

  15. López C, Benedito V, León MJ. El enfoque de competencias en la formación universitaria y su impacto en la evaluación. La perspectiva de un grupo de profesionales expertos en pedagogía. Formación Universitaria 2016;9(4):11-22.

  16. García García JA, Gonzalez Martínez JF, Estrada Aguilar L, Uriega González S. Educación médica basada en competencias. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex. 2010;73:57-69.

  17. Fernández Deaza GP, Villate Soto SL, Puerto Jiménez DN. Educación basada en competencias para estudiantes de medicina sobre la prevención y detección temprana del cáncer. Educación Médica. 2017;18(4):270-275.

  18. Durante Montiel M, Martinez González A, Morales López S, Lozano Sánchez JR, Sánchez Mendiola M. Educación por competencias: de estudiante a médico. Rev Fac Med Univ Nac Autom Mex. 2011;54:42-50.

  19. Turkeshi E, Michels N, Hendrickx K, Remmen R. Impact of family medicine clerkships in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8):1-19.

  20. Rohan Minjares F, Alfero C, Kaufman A. How Medical Schools Can Encourage Students’ Interest in Family Medicine. Academic Medicine. 2015;90(5):553-555.

  21. Zakarija Grković I, Cerovečki V, & Vrdoljak D. Partial adoption of ‘minimal core curriculum’ in undergraduate teaching of family medicine: A cross-sectional study among Central and South- Eastern European medical schools. The European Journal of General Practice. 2018;24(1):155-159.

  22. Fernández JA. Las carreras de medicina en México. Perfiles Educativos. 1996;18(73):83-89.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com