medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2020; 80 (3)

Retrocaval ureter: A case report and literature review

Rosales-Velázquez CE, Ruvalcaba-Oceguera GE, Zepeda-Aguilar A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 437.99 Kb.


Key words:

Retrocaval ureter, pre-ureteral vena cava, circumcaval ureter, hydronephrosis, Ureteroureterostomy.

ABSTRACT

Clinical case: A 49-year-old man presented with intermittent colicky pain in the right renal fossa that radiated to the right flank, accompanied with nausea and vomiting on numerous occasions. Retrocaval ureter was diagnosed through computed tomography urography and the patient was admitted to the urology service. Right dismembered ureteroureterostomy was performed with the open lumbotomy approach, finding dilatation of the renal pelvis and upper third of the right ureter and the course of the ureteral tract posterior to the inferior vena cava. The patient had satisfactory postoperative progression.
Relevance: Retrocaval ureter is a rare anomaly, in which the ureter passes behind the inferior vena cava. Only about 200 cases have been reported worldwide.
Clinical implications: The pathology presents in 70% of cases with right flank pain that can be dull and persistent or manifest as frank renal colic. Computed tomography urography is the main diagnostic method and treatment is almost always surgical.
Conclusion: Patients with retrocaval ureter may or may not require surgical treatment, depending on the symptomatology. When surgery is needed, it can be open or minimally invasive, given that a surgical gold standard has yet to be described.


REFERENCES

  1. Yen JM, Lee LS, Cheng CWS. Conservative management of retrocaval Ureter: A case series. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2015; 15:93–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.08.032

  2. Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Mendelsohn CL. Ectopic Ureter, Ureterocele, and Ureteral Anomalies. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016.

  3. Abdessater M, El Khoury R, Elias S, Bart S, Coloby P, Sleiman W. Diagnosis and laparoscopic management of retrocaval ureter: A review of the literature and our case series. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2019; 59:165– 75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.05.036

  4. Kadar A, Vatra L, Avram A, Stoica D, Oancea M. Laparoscopic Repair of a Left Retrocaval Ureter in a 16-Year-Old Girl. European J Pediatr Surg Rep. 2018;06(01): e104–7. doi: 10.1055/s- 0039-1678567

  5. Gosavi V, Hombalkar N, Dhandore P, Mody N, Bankar S. Retrocaval ureter: an innocent bystander. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(5): ND05-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7442.4372

  6. Cardoza F, Shambhulinga CK, Rajeevan AT. Retrocaval ureter and contra lateral renal agenesis – a case report and review of literature. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(4):842–4. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0549

  7. Katsui M, Asanuma H, Fukumoto K, Mizuno R, Oya M. Retrocaval Ureter Manifested after Ureteral Reimplantation for Ipsilateral Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Case Report. Urol J. 2018;15(6):397–9. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4103

  8. Gupta P, Khullar M, Sharma R, Singh R. A Rare Presentation of the Double Inferior Vena Cava with an Anomalous Retrocaval Right Ureter: Embryogenesis and Clinical Implications. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(3):518–21. doi: 10.7860/ JCDR/2013/4576.2810

  9. de Arruda GJF, de Arruda Neto JF, Eroles JC, Spessoto LCF, de Arruda JGF, Fácio FN. Incidental finding of retrocaval ureter in a patient without hydronephrosis. AME Case Rep. 2018; 2:42. doi: 10.21037/acr.2018.09.01

  10. Bhattacharjee S, Sanga S, Gupta P, George RA. Retrocaval ureter or preureteral vena cava: Lest we forget this rare cause of hydronephrosis. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016;72(Suppl 1): S77–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.08.004

  11. Mao L, Xu K, Ding M, Pan J, Guo Z. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open surgery for the correction of retrocaval ureter. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:697–701. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S139113

  12. Liu E, Sun X, Guo H, Li F, Liu S, Wang K, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic ureteroplasty for retrocaval ureter: report of nine cases and literature review. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(4):319– 22. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1177589

  13. Ahmed M, Alhassan A, Sadiq MA, Lawal AT, Bello A, Maitama HY. Variable presentation of retrocaval ureter: Report of four cases and review of literature. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2017;24(2):126–9. doi: 10.4103/npmj. npmj_48_17

  14. Peycelon M, Rembeyo G, Tanase A, Muller CO, Blanc T, Alhazmi H, et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach for retrocaval ureter in children. World J Urol. 2019; doi: 10.1007/ s00345-019-02849-w

  15. Hostiuc S, Rusu MC, Negoi I, Grigoriu M, Hostiuc M. Retrocaval ureter: a metaanalysis of prevalence. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019;41(11):1377–82. doi: 10.1007/s00276- 019-02269-w

  16. Jamaica-Verduzco E, Gállego-Sales SG. Uréter circuncavo. Rev Mex Urol. 2009;69(3):pp108–11.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2020;80