medigraphic.com

2020, Number 1

<< Back

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2020; 23 (1)

Attachment as one of the fundamental elements in the psychic working of recidivist victims

Rojas T

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 418-438
PDF size: 489.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This study is framed in the development of a model of psychic working of the recidivist victims, an addiction study is carried out in 92 adult recidivist victims, who attended the forensic psychology department of the National Service of Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Mérida- Venezuela, using the Scale of Attachment for Non-Romantic Relations and the Attachment Scale for Romantic Relations, Casullo and Fernández (2004), which has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.45 and 0.52; however, for this sample, said value was 0.79 and 0.81 respectively.. Evaluate fearful-avoidant, anxious and segure attachment. The intention is to reach a first approximation of the understanding of said sample, with the purpose of developing models and lines of investigation that allow to deepen into the phenomenon studied. Predominance was found in the presence of symptoms that refer to fearful and avoidant attachment styles, allowing us to understand elements that determine the reiteration of the people evaluated in their condition as repeat victims, which allows us to begin to identify fundamental elements in their psychic functioning, showing how it is possible that the way of understanding the links has a direct impact on the condition they are going through. It is also recommended the evaluation of other factors of mental functioning for this population, such as post-traumatic stress, personality and psychiatric disorders, in the same way as other more extensive forms of approach to the phenomenon from social, ethnographic and cultural.


REFERENCES

  1. Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1991). Attachments and other affectional bands across the life cycle. En C.M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, y P. Marris (eds).Attachment across the life cycle. Londres: Routledge.

  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M., Waters, E. y Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

  3. Bartholomew, K. (1997). Adult attachment processes: individual and couple perspectives. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 10, 249-63.

  4. Bowlby, J. (1977). The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds: I. Aetiology and Psychopathology in the Light of Attachment Theory .The Britidh Journal of Psychiatry, 130. 201-210

  5. Bowlby, J. (1998). El apego y la pérdida. Barcelona, España: Paidos.

  6. Buchheim, A., Brisch, K., y Kächele, H. (1998). Introduction to attachment theory and its significance for psychotherapy. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 48, 128-138.

  7. Casullo, M. y Fernández, M. (2004). Los estilos de apego. Teoría y medición. Buenos Aires: JVE.

  8. Crawford, T., Livesley, W., Jang, K. L., Shaver,P., Cohen, P. y Ganiban, J. (2007). Insecure attachment and personality disorder: A twin study of adults. European Journal of Personality, 21, 191-208. doi: 10.1002/per.602

  9. Donnellan, M., Burt, S., Levendosky, A. y Klump, K. (2008). Genes, personality, and attachment in adults: A multivariate behavioural genetic analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 3-16. doi: 10.1177/0146167207309199

  10. Dutton, D. (2011). Attachment and Violence: An Anger Born of Fear. En P. R. Shaver y M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human Aggression and Violence. Causes, manifestations, and consequences (pp. 259-275). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  11. Garrido, L., Guzmán, M., Santelices, M., Vitroil, V y , Baeza, E. (2015). Estudio comparativo de los estilos de apego adulto en un grupo de mujeres con y sin diagnóstico de pdeprsión. Terapia Psicológica. Vol.33 no.3. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082015000300011

  12. Gillath, O., Shaver, P., Baek, J. y Chun, D.(2008). Genetic correlates of adult attachment style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1396–1405. doi: 10.1177/0146167208321484

  13. Gulotta, G. (1976). La víctima. Varese. Italia: Guifré.

  14. Guzmán, M., Contreras, P. (2012). Estilos de apego en relaciones de las parejas y su asociación con la satisgacción marital. Psykhe. Vol.21 no.1. Pag 69-82 http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282012000100005

  15. Hentig, H. (1948). The Criminal and His Victim: Studies in the Sociology of Crime. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  16. Loinaz, I. y Echeburúa, E. (2012). Apego adulto en agresores de pareja. Accion Psicológica, Junio 2012. Vol. 9, n°1, 33-46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ap.9.1.435

  17. Mendelsohn, B. (1963). The Origin Of The Doctrine Of Victimology. Excerpta Criminologica. 3(3): 239-44

  18. Montena, M. (2014). Apego y pérdida: redescubriendo a John Bowlby. Revista chilena de pediatría. Vol. 85. No.3. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0370-41062014000300001

  19. Morín, E. (2005). El paradigma perdido. Barcelona, España: Kairós

  20. Rojas, T (2018). Aproximaciones al funcionamiento psíquico y responsabilidad de la víctima reincidente. Análisis de contenido. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala. 21(1), 334-354. Recuperado de http://www.iztacala.unam.mx/carreras/psicologia/psiclin/vol21num1/Vol21No1Art18.pdf

  21. Vernengo, M. (2005). Apego. Psicoanálisis: ayer y hoy, número 4. Recuperado de https://www.elpsicoanalisis.org.ar/old/numero4/resenaapego4.htm

  22. Waters, E., Hamilton, C. y Weinfield, N. (2000). The stability of attachment security from infancy to adolescence and early adulthood: general introduction. Child Development, 71, 678-683.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com