medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2020, Number 08

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2020; 88 (08)

Influence of disparate language (Tutunakú and Spanish) in messages and instructions issued by health personnel and those receiving the information

García-García F, García-García JP, Parra-Torres NM, Mendoza-Catalán G, Almonte-Becerril M

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 517-524
PDF size: 221.11 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To identify the influence of the disparate language (tutunaku and Spanish) between the messages and instructions issued by health personnel and those of the recipients of this information, in particular that directed at the practice of self-examination for the purpose of breast cancer prevention.
Materials and Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study, carried out on indigenous women over 20 years of age, to whom a semi-structured instrument was applied for the identification of risk factors and protection from breast cancer. To determine the association of Totonaku speakers' variables with the level of knowledge, prevention and risk of breast cancer, the test of 2 was used.
Results: A total of 187 women were studied; 109 (58.5%) spoke only tutunaku and 78 (41.5%) were bilingual (tutunaku and Spanish). The average age of participants was 43.4 years (SD 14.8), with limits of 20 and 80 years. With regard to schooling: 93 of 109 (85.5%) of the monolingual women were illiterate and only 44 of 78 (57.1%) of the bilingual women had completed basic education. With regard to knowledge of breast cancer, monolingual women had a lower level of knowledge and less practice of self-examination; only 34 of the 78 bilingual women practiced self-examination.
Conclusion: Although the risk of breast cancer is not associated with speaking a language, it is directly associated with schooling, with the ability to understand instructions that allow the practice of self-examination.


REFERENCES

  1. Santana-Chávez L, et al. Efectividad de la autoexploración mamaria supervisada como estrategia educativa. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015; 83: 522-28.

  2. López-Carrillo L, et al. Utilización correcta de las técnicas de detección de cáncer de mama en mujeres mexicanas. Salud Pública Méx. 2014; 56 (5): 538-46 .http://dx.doi. org/10.21149/spm.v56i5.7711

  3. Bray F, Piñeros M. Cancer patterns, trends and projections in Latin America an the Caribbean: a global context. Salud Pública Méx. 2016; 58 (2): 104-117. http://dx.doi. org/10.21149/spm.v58i2.7779

  4. Gutierrez-Delgado C, et al. Estimating the indirect costs associated with the expected number of cancer cases in Mexico by 2020. Salud Pública Méx. 2016; 58: 228-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i2.7792

  5. Cárdenas-Sánchez J, et al. Consenso Mexicano sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer mamario. Octava revisión. Colima 2019. Gac Mex Oncol. 2018; 18: 141-231. doi:10.24875/j.gamo.M19000180

  6. Anastasiadi Z, et al. Breast cancer in young women: an overview. Updates surg. 2017; 27 (5): 1631-36. doi:10.1007/ s13304-017-0424-1

  7. Azim HA, Partridge AH. Biology of breast cancer in young women. Breast Cancer Res. 2014; 16 (4): 427. doi: 10.1186/ s13058-014-0427-5

  8. Coronado G, et al. Alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer. Salud Pública Méx. 2011; 53 (5): 440-47. doi: 10.1186/bcr2422

  9. Sifuentes-Álvarez A, et al. Factores de riesgo asociados con el cáncer de mama en mujeres del estado de Durango. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015; 83: 662-69.

  10. Grajales-Pérez E, et al. Factores de riesgo para el cáncer de mama en México: revisión de estudios en poblaciones mexicanas y México-Americanas. Rev. CES Salud Pública. 2014; 5 (1): 132-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0036- 36342009000800017

  11. Navarro-Ibarra M, et al. Influencia de los factores reproductivos, la lactancia materna y la obesidad sobre el riesgo de cáncer de mama en mujeres mexicanas. Nutr Hosp. 2015; 32 (1): 291-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3305/ nh.2015.32.1.9049

  12. Moore S, et al. Cancer in indigenous people in Latin America and the Caribbean: a review. Cancer Med. 2014; 3 (1): 70-80. doi: 10.1002/cam4.134

  13. Health Policy Parnership. Cáncer de mama metastásico en méxico: Un llamado a la acción. México, 2016. http:// www.healthpolicypartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/ metastatic_breast_cancer/Mexico_StoryBoard_on_MBC_ Mexico_Spanish_260216.pdf> (Consulta: Febrero 2020).

  14. Oladimeji K, et al. Knowledge and Beliefs of Breast SelfExamination and Brest Cancer among market women in Ibadam, South West, Nigeria. Plos One. 2015; 1-11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140904

  15. Camejo-Mártinez N, et al. Encuestas sobre prevención del cáncer de mama en una población de mujeres uruguayas. An Fac Med. 2018; 5 (2): 63-74. http://dx.doi. org/10.25184/anfamed2018v5n2a6

  16. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Politica de Desrrollo Social [CONEVAL]. La pobreza en la población indígena de México 2008-2018. Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2307/j. ctv1xxvwr.66

  17. Gail M, et al. Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91 (21): 1846-49. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals. jnci.a024159

  18. Rockhill B, et al. Validation of the Gail et al. Model of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Implication for Chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93 (5): 358-66. https://doi. org/10.1093/jnci/93.5.358

  19. Gómez F. Evaluación cuantitativa del riesgo de cáncer de mama. Rev Med Clin las Condes. 2006; 17 (4): 149-63.

  20. Muñoz-Torres T, et al. Plan de cuidado enfermero estandarizado en paciente con cáncer de mama. Rev Enferm Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2012; 20 (2): 97-104.

  21. Marzo-Castillejo M, et al. Recomendaciones de prevención del cáncer. Actualización PAPPS 2018. Atención Primaria. 2018; 50 (1): 41-65. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(18)30362-7

  22. Nde F, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of breast self-examintation among female undergraduate students in the University of Buea. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8 (43): 2-6. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1004-4.

  23. Pérez Zumano S, et al. Factores de riesgo para cáncer de mama. Revisión de la literatura: Rol potencial de Enfermería. Enferm Universitaria 2009; 6 (3): 21-26. https://doi. org/10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2009.3.330

  24. Zonderhuis B, et al. Breast Self-Examination also valuable in women participating in a screaning programe. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008; 52 (43): 2341-45. doi. 10.1186/ s13104-015-1004-4.

  25. Manrique-Abril F, et al. Factores asociados a la práctica correcta del autoexamen de mama en mujeres de Tunja (colombia). Invest Educ Enferm. 2012; 30 (1): 18-27. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1695-61412011000300003

  26. Reath J, Carey M. Breast and cervical cancer in indigenous women: Overcoming barriers to early detection. Aust Fam Physician. 2008; 37 (3): 178-82.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com