García MCD, Pérez PA, Cid RMC, Pérez QJA, Bello FR

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page:
PDF size: 139.74 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: autogenous and autologous bone grafts are the elective material for replacing bones lost by trauma, congenital or acquired pathologic processes and atrophy.
Objective: to characterize patients with atrophic rims needing rehabilitation in oral grafting as an alternative treatment in the Maxilla-Facial Surgery consultation of the University Hospital “Faustino Perez” and the Clinic “III Congreso del PCC”, municipality of Matanzas, from September 2014 to July 2016.
Materials and Methods: longitudinal prospective study. The universe was 20 patients aged 18 years and older, males and females, who presented the diagnosis of partial lack of teeth and alveolar atrophy. The symptoms and signs characterizing this entity were stated by questioning, physical examination and diagnostic means.
Results: alveolar traumas were the predominant cause of dental lost in male patients aged 18-37 years. The most affected zone was the anterior region of the upper maxilla; bone lost in height and width predominated, and a great number of grafts conserved the alveolar crest.
Conclusions: the use of biomaterials in the treatment of patients with alveolar atrophy together with bone graft was satisfactory in patients who needed a base support on which to put dental grafts.

REFERENCES

1. Benic GI, Elmasry M, Hämmerle CH. Novel digital techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(Suppl11):86-96. Citado en PubMed;PMID:26010421.

2. Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, et al. Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(3):377-88.Citado en PubMed:PMID:25467739.

3. Pérez Villaseñor J, Villanueva Jurado D. Reconstrucción de proceso alveolar maxilar con injerto autólogo de cresta iliaca. Rev Odontológica Mexicana[Internet]. 2014 [citado 05/08/ 2018]; 18(4):263-70.Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1870199X14703155

4. Aresti Allende A, Martín Vera P. Tratamiento de defectos óseos con biomateriales y técnicas de barrera [Internet].Canadá: Dental Tribune[citado 05/08/ 2018]; 2014. Disponible en: https://la.dental-tribune.com/news/tratamiento-de-defectos-oseos-conbiomateriales- y-tecnicas-de-barrera/

5. Javed F, Romanos GE. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig.2015;19(1):1-10. Citado en PubMed; PMID:25366871.

6. Chang SH, Huang SR, Huang SF, et al. Mechanical response comparison in an implantoverdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and minidental implants: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016;19(8):911-21. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 26212887.

7. Prasant MC, Thukral R, Kumar S, et al. Assessment of Various Risk Factors for Success of Delayed and Immediate Loaded Dental Implants:A Retrospective Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Oct 1;17(10):853-856. Citado en PubMed ;PMID: 27794158.

8. Morra M, Cassinelli C, Bollati D, et al. Adherentendotoxinon dental implantsurfaces: a reappraisal. J Oral Implantol. 2015 Feb;41(1):10-6. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 25699642.

9. Kulkarni GH, Jadhav P, Kulkarni K, et al. Assessment of Myeloperoxidase and Nitric Levels around Dental Implants and Natural Teeth as a Marker of Inflammation: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(11):934-38. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27965504.

10. Corona Carpio MH, Hernández Espinosa Y, Mondelo López I, et al. Principales factores causales del fracaso de los implantes dentales. MEDISAN [Internet]. 2015 [citado 05/01/ 2018] ; 19(11): 1325-29. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S102930192015001100004&lng =es

11. Chen ST, Wilson TG, Hämmerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 19 Suppl:12-25. Citado en PubMed; PMID:15635942

12. Tran DT, Gay IC, Diaz-Rodriguez J, et al. Survival of Dental Implants Placed in Grafted and Nongrafted Bone: A Retrospective Study in a University Setting. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(2):310-7.Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27004278.

13. Gutiérrez Pérez JL, García Calderón M. Intregración de la implantología en la práctica odontológica. España: Edición Española; 1998. p. 1- 10, 56-70

14. Monzón Trujillo D, Martínez Brito I, Rodríguez Sarduy R, et al. Injertos óseos en implantología oral. Rev Med Electrón[Internet]. 2014[citado 18/08/ 2018];36(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1684- 18242014000400007

15. Azañón Hernández R, Martínez Lara I, Ferrer Gallego J, et al. Pertinencia del uso de implantes dentales cortos en pacientes con atrofia ósea severa. Revisión de la literatura. Avances en Periodoncia [Internet]. 2013 [citado 19/02/2018]; 25(3). Disponible en: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4549182

16. Amillo S, González F, Illescas JA. Incorporación de aloinjertos óseos intercalares corticales: Estudio experimental en conejos. Anales Sis San Navarra [Internet]. 2014 [citado 19/02/2018];26(3):357-63. Disponible en: http://dspace.unav.es/dspace/handle/10171/22298

17. García Briseño ME. Materiales de injerto substitutos óseos. Fosfato tricálcico â. Presentación de casos clínicos. Rev Mex Periodontol[Internet].2015[citado19/02/2018];VI(1):26-32. Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/periodontologia/mp-2015/mp151f.pdf

18. Veitz-Keenan A. Marginal bone loss and dental implant failure may be increased in smokers. Evid Based Dent. 2016;17(1):6-7. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27012565.