medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Humanidades Médicas

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hum Med 2020; 20 (1)

Sociocultural approach to the feminine genital mutilation

Luján RY, Betancourt ÁPR, Fajo BÁ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 206-225
PDF size: 299.42 Kb.


Key words:

feminine genital mutilation, ablation, feminine circumcision.

ABSTRACT

The feminine genital mutilation is registered among the harmful traditional practices recognized as form of violence against the women and the girls. Complex topic, delicate and politicized, difficult to understand through normative definitions, classifications and geographical delimitation. Its ignorance, on the part of the professionals of the health, can contribute to an inadequate handling of the patients, as part of their integral attention. The work takes as an objective to argue on sociocultural aspects of the Feminine Genital Mutilation, essential for its integral handling for the health professional. The approach, called “five P” is recommended: predominance, prevention, protection, pursuit and provision of services. Moreover, the reproach attitudes must be avoided or victimization towards the patient, expression of a eurocentral and paternalistic look towards the different, unexpected or unknown; as well as not to promote the medicalization of the practice.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. Ginebra: World Health Organization [Internet]. 2016.1-7 [citado 21/10/2018]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/management-health-complicationsfgm/ en/

  2. UNICEF. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A global concern. Nueva York: UNICEF [Internet]. 2016 [cited 21/10/2018]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/female-genital-mutilationcutting-global-concern/

  3. Baldé C, Arroyo A. Estudio de casos sobre la mutilación genital femenina “Jadare” en la cultura fulbe (Guinea Bissau). Cultura de los Cuidados [Internet]. 2019; 23(53)[citado 29/1/2020]. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2019.53.15

  4. Pastor Bravo MD, Almansa Martínez P. La mutilación genital femenina desde la perspectiva de las mujeres afectadas. Abordaje desde Enfermería. España. Digitum: Biblioteca universitaria [Internet]. 2016[citado 29/1/2020].Disponible en: https://digitum.um.es/xmlui/simplesearch?query=mutilaci%C3%B3n+genital+femeni na

  5. Modrek S, Sieverding M. Mother, Daughter, Doctor: Medical Professionals and Mothers’ Decision Making About Female Genital Cutting in Egypt. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health [Internet]. 2016 [cited 29/1/2020]; 42(2). Available from: http://about.jstor.org/terms/10.1363/42e1116

  6. Johnsdotter S, Ruth M, Mestre I. Female Genital Mutilation in Europe: An analysis of court cases, Luxemburgo: Dirección General de Justicia de la Comisión Europea [Internet]. 2015[citado 29/1/2020]. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293301208_Female_Genital_Mutilation_in _Europe_An_Analysis_of_Court_Cases

  7. Baer M, Brysk A. New Rights for Private Wrongs: Female Genital Mutilation and Global Framing Dialogues. En: The International Struggle for New Human Rights. Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press [Internet]. 2009[cited 29/1/2020]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293308804_New_rights_for_private_wron gs_Female_genital_mutilation_and_global_framing_dialogues

  8. Orubuloye I, Caldwell P, Caldwell J. Female Circumcision Among the Yoruba of Southern Nigeria: The beginning of change. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Londres [Internet]. 2000 [cited 20/9/2019]. Available from: https://www.rienner.com/title/Female_Circumcision_in_Africa_Culture_Controversy_ and_Change

  9. Rahman A, Toubia N. Female Genital Mutilation. A guide to laws and policies worlwide, Zedbook, Londres [Internet]. 2000[cited 20/9/2019]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236715390_Female_Genital_Mutilation_A _Guide_to_Laws_and_Policies_Worldwide_review

  10. Erice A. Mutilación Genital: Relevancia del fenómeno cultural en su tratamiento jurídico-penal. Pamplona. Iruñea. [Internet]. 2017 [citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://academicae. unavarra.es/bitstream/handle/2454/23783/72341TFMerice.pdf?sequence=1&isAll owed=y

  11. INNOCENTI Centro de Investigación de UNICEF, Cambiar una convención social perjudicial: la ablación o mutilación genital femenina, Innocenti Digest. UNICEF, Florencia [Internet]. 2006 [citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/403-cambiar-una-convenci%C3%B3n-socialperjudicial- la-ablaci%C3%B3n-o-mutilaci%C3%B3n-genital-femenina.html

  12. Facchi A. Mutilaciones genitales femeninas y derecho positivo[Internet]. Madrid: Consejo General del Poder Judicial; 2001[citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=562057

  13. Alvarez MC. Sobre la mutilación genital femenina y otros demonios [Internet]. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona; 2001[citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://atheneadigital.net/article/view/130/130

  14. Kaplan A. Mutilaciones genitales femeninas: entre los derechos humanos y el derecho a la identidad étnica y de género[Internet]. Madrid: La Multiculturalidad; 2001 [citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=607968

  15. Asociación Afromujer de Andalucía. Las mujeres africanas ante las mutilaciones genitales femeninas[Internet]. 2006 [citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.uv.es/cefd/17/blucas_antropo.pdf

  16. Instituto Europeo de la Igualdad de Género (IEIG). Female genital mutilation in the European Union and Croatia. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea [Internet].2003 [citado 20/9/2019]. Disponible en: https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/eige-report-fgm-in-the-eu-andcroatia. pdf

  17. Belluck P, Cochrane J. Unicef Report finds Female Genital Cutting to be common in Indonesia. New York Times[Internet].2016 [cited 20/9/2019]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/05/health/indonesia-female-genital-cuttingcircumcision- unicef.html?_r=3.

  18. Al Hinai H. Female Genital Mutilation in the Sultanate of Oman [Internet].2014 [cited 26/10/2018]. Available from: http://www.stopfgmmideast.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/habiba-al-hinai-femalegenital- mutilation-in-the-sultanate-of-oman1.pdf.

  19. Ragnhild E, Johansen P. Undoing female genital cutting: perceptions and experiences of infibulation, defibulation and virginity among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. Culture, HealtH & Sexuality [Internet]. 2017 [cited 29/1/2020]; 19 (4). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1239838.

  20. Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas Naciones (oficina de Colombia) (FNUAP-Colombia). Project Embera-wera: An experience of cultural change to eradicate female genital mutilation in Colombia – Latin America [Internet]. 2011 [citado 26/10/2018]. Disponible en: https://colombia.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pubpdf/ proyectoembera%20%281%29%20%281%29.pdf

  21. Consejo de Europa y Amnistía Internacional. The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence: A tool to end female genital mutilation, Estrasburgo: Consejo de Europa y Amnistía Internacional [Internet].2014 [citado 21/9/2019]; 1(58). Disponible en:https://www.endfgm.eu/content/documents/studies/Istanbul-Convention-FGMguide. pdf

  22. Johansen R, Elise B, Nafissatou J, et al. What Works and What Does Not: A Discussion of Popular Approaches for the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation. Obstetrics and Gynecology International [Internet]. 2013 [cited 21/9/ 2019]; 1(11). Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ogi/2013/348248/

  23. Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados Too Much Pain: Female Genital Mutilation & Asylum in the European Union – A Statistical Overview. Ginebra: ACNUR [Internet]. 2013 [citado 21/9/ 2019].Disponible en: http://www.unhcr.org/531880249.pdf.

  24. Leye E, Jessika D, García J, Johnsdotter S, et al. An analysis of the implementation of laws with regard to female genital mutilation in Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change [Internet]. 2007 [cited 21/9/ 2019]; 47(1). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225674416_An_analysis_of_the_impleme ntation_of_laws_with_regard_to_female_genital_mutilation_in_Europe

  25. Johnsdotter S. Projected Cultural Histories of the Cutting of Female Genitalia: A poor reflection as in a mirror. History and Anthropology [Internet]. 2012 [cited 21/9/ 2019]; 23(1). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263677616_Projected_Cultural_Histories_ of_the_Cutting_of_Female_Genitalia_A_Poor_Reflection_as_in_a_Mirror




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Hum Med. 2020;20