medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior

ISSN 1561-2902 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior 2020; 34 (2)

The teaching of microscopic anatomy without microscopes

Carpio ME
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page:
PDF size: 274.10 Kb.


Key words:

medical education, histology, learning.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Traditionally, hands-on classes with optical microscopes and histological laminae have been the primary method for teaching Microscopic Anatomy to medical students. In this article, we proposed a paradigm shift.
Objective: To discuss the foundations that support the convenience of teaching Microscopic Anatomy to medical students without optical microscopes, histological laminae, or hands-on classes in microscopy laboratories.
Development: It is proposed to give a leading role to mobile devices, through which students can manage their learning and interact with the teaching media and with the teacher. Digital images of histological preparations representing different study methods and microscopes (optical microscopy, electron microscopy, immunofluorescence, etc.) will be essential for learning. A seminar-type teaching activity and not the traditional hands-on classes with optical microscopes and histological laminae would be the most suitable teaching form. In this way, exchange and debate would be fostered, based on digital images that will be projected on a screen in order to favor the explanation and discussion of the contents. Ten arguments are offered to support the rationality of the proposal.
Conclusions: The arguments in favor of teaching Histology using optical microscopes, histological laminae, and microscopy laboratory practices have been the basis for teaching its contents in every year, but the development of information and communication technologies could make them unnecessary. This paradigm shift must first undergo empirical testing and theoretical debate.


REFERENCES

  1. Ostrin Z, Dushenkov V. Pulling the plug on microscopes in the anatomy and physiology laboratory. 2017 [acceso 22/01/2020]. Disponible en: http://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=ho_pubs

  2. Torres Mancera D, Gago Saldaña D. Los MOOCS y su papel en la creación de comunidades de aprendizaje y participación. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 2014 [acceso 22/01/2020];17(1):13-34. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=331429941002

  3. Cheng X, Ka Ho Lee K, Chang EY, Yang X. The “flipped classroom” approach: Stimulating positive learning attitudes and improving mastery of histology among medical students: Flipped Classroom in Histology Course in China. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2017 Jul. [acceso 22/01/2020];10(4):317-27. Disponible en: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ase.1664

  4. Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. 2018 Mar. [acceso 22/01/2020];18(1):38. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z

  5. Joynes V, Fuller R. Legitimization, personalization and maturation: Using the experiences of a compulsory mobile curriculum to reconceptualise mobile learning. Medical Teacher. 2016 Jun. [acceso 22/01/2020];38(6):621-7. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1075651

  6. Swinnerton BJ, Morris NP, Hotchkiss S, Pickering JD. The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum: Anatomy MOOC. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2017 Ener. [acceso 22/01/2020];10(1):53-67. Disponible en: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ase.1625

  7. Wojciech Pawlina. Ross Histología Texto y Atlas. Correlación con biología molecular y celular. Barcelona: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.

  8. Wilson AB, Taylor MA, Klein BA, Sugrue MK, Whipple EC, Brokaw JJ. Meta-analysis and review of learner performance and preference: virtual versus optical microscopy. Medical Education. 2016 Abr. [acceso 22/01/2020];50(4):428-40. Disponible en: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/medu.12944

  9. Trelease RB. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education: How Computing Transformed Anatomy Education. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2016 Nov. [acceso 22/01/2020];9(6):583-602. Disponible en: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ase.1620

  10. McCoy L, Lewis JH, Dalton D. Gamification and Multimedia for Medical Education: A Landscape Review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Ener. [acceso 22/01/2020];116(1):22. Disponible en: http://jaoa.org/article.aspx?doi=10.7556/jaoa.2016.003




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior. 2020;34