medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Pública de México

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2020; 62 (6)

Provision of immediate postpartum contraceptive methods in Mexico, 2018-19

de la Vara-Salazar E, Hubert C, Saavedra-Avendaño B, Suárez-López L, Villalobos A, Ávila-Burgos L, Hernández-Serrato MI, Schiavon R, Darney BG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 637-647
PDF size: 305.63 Kb.


Key words:

contraceptives, postpartum, adolescents, adults, health services, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To identify sociodemographic and health services factors associated with receipt of immediate postpartum (IPP) contraception and the type of contraceptive method received. Materials and methods. We used the National Health and Nutrition Survey (Ensanut), 2018-19, which contains information on 4 548 women aged 12-49 years who gave birth. We described receipt of IPP contraception and method type and used multivariable logistic (n=4 544) and multinomial regression (n=2 903) to examine receipt of any modern method and type of method. Results. 65% of women received IPP contraception. 56.8% of adolescents received long-acting reversible contraception (43.7% IUD & 13.1% implant). Being indigenous, having only one child, or receiving care in State Health Services/IMSS-Prospera or private sector facilities were associated with lower odds of receiving IPP contraception. Conclusions. We identify progress in the IPP contraception coverage among adolescents. Disparities persist in receipt of IPP contraception by type of health insurance.


REFERENCES

  1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(4):297-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055

  2. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Lammers C. Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: Cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):342-9. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.593

  3. Secretaría de Salud. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-005- SSA2-1993 de los servicios de planificación familiar [internet]. México: SS, 2004. Disponible en: http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/005ssa293.html

  4. Darney BG, Sosa-Rubi SG, Servan-Mori E, Rodriguez MI, Walker D, Lozano R. The relationship of age and place of delivery with postpartum contraception prior to discharge in Mexico: A retrospective cohort study. Contraception. 2016;93(6):478-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception. 2016.01.015

  5. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. Estudios de la OCDE sobre los Sistemas de Salud: México 2016 [internet]. París: OCDE Publishing, 2016. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10.1787/9789264265523-es

  6. Romero-Martínez M, Shamah-Levy T, Vielma-Orozco E, Heredia-Hernández O, Mojica-Cuevas J, Cuevas-Nasu L, Rivera-Dommarco J. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2018-19: metodología y perspectivas. Salud Publica Mex. 2019;61(6):917-23. https://doi.org/10.21149/11095

  7. Trussell J, Aiken ARA, Micks E, Guthrie KA. Efficacy, safety, and personal considerations [internet]. En: Hatcher RA, Nelson AL, Trussell J, Cwiak C, Cason P, Policar MS, et al., eds. Contraceptive technology. 21st ed. New York: Ayer Company Publishers Inc, 2018. Disponible en: http://www. contraceptivetechnology.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Contraception- Effectiveness.pdf

  8. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley,2013.

  9. Secretaría de Salud. Programa de acción específico. Planificación familiar y anticoncepción 2013-2018 [internet]. México: SS, 2014. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/10047/PlanificacionFamiliaryAnticoncepcion. pdf

  10. Baldwin MK, Edelman AB. The Effect of long-acting reversible contraception on rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: A review. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4):S47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth. 2012.10.278

  11. Potter JE, Hubert C, White K. The Availability and use of postpartum LARC in Mexico and among hispanics in the United States. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(9):1744-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2179-6

  12. Saavedra-Avendano B, Andrade-Romo Z, Rodriguez MI, Darney BG. Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: Lessons from Mexico. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(9):1724-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10995-016-2013-1

  13. Allen-Leigh B, Villalobos-Hernández A, Hernández-Serrato MI, Suárez L, De la Vara E, de Castro F, Schiavon-Ermani R. Inicio de vida sexual, uso de anticonceptivos y planificación familiar en mujeres adolescentes y adultas en México. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(supl 2):S235-40.

  14. Correia L, Martins I, Oliveira N, Antunes I, Palma F, Alves MJ. Contraceptive choices pre and post pregnancy in adolescence. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(1):24-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.004

  15. Consejo Nacional de Población. Situación de la Salud Sexual y Reproductiva. República Mexicana [internet]. Mexico: Conapo, 2016. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/237216/Cuadernillo_ SSR_RM.pdf

  16. García B, Castro R, Martínez C. Salud reproductiva y condiciones de vida en México. Estud Demogr Urbanos Colmex [internet]. 2011;26(1):195-213. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/educm/ v26n1/2448-6515-educm-26e-01-195.pdf

  17. Khan M, Kotecha I. Is maternal health services utilization predict the contraceptives adoption in extended postpartum period: A communitybased cross-sectional study done in urban slums of Western Gujarat. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(3):1164-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc. jfmpc_122_19

  18. Eeckhaut MCW. Marital status and female and male contraceptive sterilization in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1509-15. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.036

  19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. Committee Opinion No. 552: Benefits to women of medicaid expansion through the affordable care act. (Reaffirmed 2016). Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(552):221-3. Disponible en: https://www.acog.org/-/media/project/acog/acogorg/clinical/files/committee- opinion/articles/2013/01/benefits-to-women-of-medicaid-expansionthrough- the-affordable-care-act.pdf

  20. Moore Z, Pfitzer A, Gubin R, Charurat E, Elliott L, Croft T. Missed opportunities for family planning: an analysis of pregnancy risk and contraceptive method use among postpartum women in 21 low- and middle-income countries. Contraception. 2015;92(1):31-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. contraception.2015.03.007

  21. Goldthwaite LM, Shaw KA. Immediate postpartum provision of long-acting reversible contraception. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(6):460-4.

  22. Navarro-Núñez C, Álvarez-González G, Tene-Pérez CE, Millán-Guerrero RO, Trujillo-Hernández B. Causas de no uso de método anticonceptivo posparto entre madres adolescentes. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2005;73(2):63- 8. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/ginobsmex/gom- 2005/gom052b.pdf

  23. Brenes-Monge A, Saavedra-Avendaño B, Alcalde-Rabanal J, Darney BG. Are overweight and obesity associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery in Mexico? A cross-sectional study from the National Survey of Health and Nutrition. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):239. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2393-5

  24. Blanc AK, Tsui AO, Croft TN, Trevitt JL. Patterns and trends in adolescents’ contraceptive use and discontinuation in developing countries and comparisons with adult women. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35(2):63-71. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40233806

  25. Montague M, Ascha M, Wilkinson B, Verbus E, Morris J, Mercer BM, Arora KS. Role of bridge contraception in postpartum long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization fulfillment rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):583-90.

  26. Chandra-Mouli V, Camacho AV, Michaud PA. WHO Guidelines on preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes among adolescents in developing countries. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5):517-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.03.002

  27. Thiel-de Bocanegra H, Chang R, Howell M, Darney P. Interpregnancy intervals: impact of postpartum contraceptive effectiveness and coverage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):311.e1-311.e8. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.020

  28. Morán C, Fuentes G, Amado F, Higareda H, Bailen R, Zárate A. La práctica de la anticoncepción posparto en hospitales del Distrito Federal. Salud Publica Mex. 1992;34(1):18-24.

  29. de la Vara-Salazar E, Suárez-López L, Rivera L, Lazcano-Ponce E. Providers perspective and geographic and institutional factors associated with family planning counseling. Sex Reprod Health Care. 2018;16:33-8. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.01.005

  30. Hindin MJ, Kalamar AM, Thompson TA, Upadhyay UD. Interventions to prevent unintended and repeat pregnancy among young people in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the published and gray literature. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(3):S8-15. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.04.021




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

salud publica mex. 2020;62