medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-3178 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, A.C.

2020, Number 2-3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Bucal Maxilofac 2020; 16 (2-3)

Trujillo’s soft tissue cephalometric analysis applied to virtual planning

Trujillo FJJ, Saavedra AO

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 71-86
PDF size: 769.91 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Today technology is present in all areas of our lives, from the simplest to the most complex, from those present in our way of life to those present in our work activities. The inclusion of these technologies is due to the advantages they offer when performing our tasks and they are usually technologies that are applied to already established methods, for example; bicycle, horse-drawn cart, car or radio, black and white television, color television. The fundamental principles are the same only today’s technology improves the way we can apply these fundamentals. Similarly in the area of orthognathic surgery has emerged a technology that many believe and argue that came to stay, is the technology of virtual reality, from this approach the team that presents this article, I take the recognized and very functional cephalometric analysis of hard tissues of Dr. Juan José Trujillo Fandiño (Trujillo’s analysis) and adapt it to make the measurements of such analysis in three-dimensional technology. Conclusions: Trujillo’s hard tissue analysis has measurements of all the bone structures involved in orthognathic surgery, so it seems to us to be the indispensable analysis for the diagnostic complement of the clinical examination, indispensable as pre-surgical cephalometric analysis.


REFERENCES

  1. Broadbent BS. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931; 1: 45-66.

  2. van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39 (2): 156-160.

  3. Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Yuan P, Li J, Chen KC et al. Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44 (12): 1441-1450.

  4. Smekta?a T, J?drzejewski M, Szyndel J, Sporniak-Tutak K, Olszewski R. Experimental and clinical assessment of three-dimensional cephalometry: a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 42 (8): 1795-1801.

  5. Swennen GR, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130 (3): 410-416.

  6. Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF. Effect of facial asymmetry on 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69 (3): 655-662.

  7. Anas IY, Bamgbose BO, Nuhu S. A comparison between 2D and 3D methods of quantifying facial morphology. Heliyon. 2019; 5 (6): e01880.

  8. Gubler M, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: 3D vs. 2D. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2009; 107: 4-10.

  9. Gui H, Wu J, Shen SG, Bautista JS, Voss PJ, Zhang S. Navigation-guided lateral gap arthroplasty as the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72 (1): 128-138.

  10. Yitschaky O, Redlich M, Abed Y, Faerman M, Casap N, Hiller N. Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81 (1): 11-16.

  11. Naini FB, Gill DS. Orthognathic surgery. principles, planning and practice. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Press; 2017.

  12. Alexander DC, Koeberlein GM. Geometría. 5a ed. México: Cengage Learning Press; 2013.

  13. Lehmann CH. Geometría Analítica. 3a ed. México: Limusa Press; 1999.

  14. Madsen DP, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC. Craniofacial reference plane variation and natural head position. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30 (5): 532-540.

  15. Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF. New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69 (3): 606-622.

  16. Bell WH, Jacobs JD, Quejada JG. Simultaneous repositioning of the maxilla, mandible, and chin. Treatment planning and analysis of soft tissues. Am J Orthod. 1986; 89 (1): 28-50.

  17. Heufelder M, Wilde F, Pietzka S, Mascha F, Winter K, Schramm A et al. Clinical accuracy of waferless maxillary positioning using customized surgical guides and patient specific osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017; 45 (9): 1578-1585.

  18. Moorrees CF, Kean MR. Natural head position, a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs. Am J Phys Anthrop. 1958; 16: 213-234.

  19. Lundström F, Lundström A. Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101 (3): 244-247.

  20. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Ren Y. Simple technique to achieve a natural position of the head for cone beam computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 48 (3): 236-238.

  21. Schatz EC, Xia JJ, Gateno J, English JD, Teichgraeber JF, Garrett FA. Development of a technique for recording and transferring natural head position in 3 dimensions. J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21 (5): 1452-1455.

  22. Zamora Montes de Oca CE. Compendio de Cefalometría. 2a ed. México: Amolca; 2010.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com