medigraphic.com
ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2020; 10 (1)

Productive behavior and composition of the carcass of the Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris)

Camas-Robles G, Ruiz-Sesma B, Mendoza-Nazar P, Portillo-Salgado R, Hernández-Marín A, Cigarroa-Vázquez F

Language: Spanish
References: 41
Page: 1-14
PDF size: 812.20 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate productive indicators of growth, carcass aspects and the proximal composition of the meat of the Guinea Fowl (GF) reared under tropical conditions in Mexico. It was carried out from July 2016 to May 2017. The productive behavior (PB) of 100 keets in 14 weeks was evaluated and for the trait of the carcass (TC) samples of 5 males and 5 females were analyzed. It was evaluated in PB, Weight gain (WG), feed consumption (FC) and feed conversion (FCO) and in TC, carcass yield (CY), water retention capacity (WRC), pH and color. Descriptive statistics were performed and a generalized linear model (GLM) was used to detect differences between sex, using the SAS statistical package (Ver. 9.4). The final average weight was 1161.56 ± 94.82 g with a WG of 10.98 ± 0.95 g/bird, FC of 62.04 ± 2.48 g and an FCO of 5.65 ± 0.57 g. Males were superior (79.3%) in the CY, without statistical differences (P› 0.05). The WRC and the pH were very similar. GF production is an alternative meat supply being a source of animal protein.


REFERENCES

  1. ABDUL-RAHMAN II, Awumbila B, Jeffcoate IA, Robinson JE, Obese FY. 2015. Sexing in guinea fowls (Numida meleagris). Poultry Science. 94:311–318. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu067

  2. AGGREY, SE 2009. Logistic nonlinear mixed effects model for estimating growth parameters. Poultry Science. 88: 276-280. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00317

  3. AOAC. 2005. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official method of analysis. 18th ed. W. Horwitz, ed. AOAC Int., Gaitherburg, MD. Pp. 684. ISBN: 0935584676. http://sutlib2.sut.ac.th/sut_contents/H125800.pdf

  4. ARHIN E, Annor SY, Kagya-Agyemang JK, Addsison D, Zagbede GA. 2018. Innovation for sexing Guinea fowls (Numida meleagris) at day one of hatching. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 30 (9). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/9/askin30157.html

  5. BARBOSA-FILHO JA, Almeida M, Shimokomaki M, Pinheiro JW, Silva CA., Michelan Filho T, Bueno FR, Oba A. 2017. Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of griller-type broilers of four genetic lines. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 19: 109-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0261

  6. BERNACKI Z, Bawej M, Kokoszyński D. 2012. Quality of meat from two guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) varieties. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde. 76 (3): 203–207. ISSN 0003- 9098. https://www.european-poultry-science.com/Quality-of-meat-from-two-guinea-fowlspan- classws-name-Numida-meleagrisspanvarieties, QUlEPTQyMjA5NDEmTUlEPTE2MTAxNA.html

  7. BOZ MA, Oz F, Yamak US, Sarica M, Cilavdaroglu E. 2019. The carcass traits, carcass nutrient composition, amino acid, fatty acid, and cholesterol contents of local Turkish goose varieties reared in an extensive production system. Poultry Science. 98:3067– 3080. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez125

  8. CHIROQUE G, Vázquez G, Vázquez E, Vázquez E, Más D, Betancur C, Ruíz C, Botello A, Martínez Y. 2018. Growth performance, carcass traits and breast meat fatty acids profile of helmeted Guinea fowls (Numida meleagris) fed increasing level of linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and pumpkin seed (Cucurbita moschata) meals. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 20: 665-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0760

  9. DAHOUDA M, Sènou M, Toléba SS, Boko CK, Adandédjan J.C, Hornick JL. 2008. Comparaison des caractéristiques de production de la pintade locale (Meleagris numida) en station et dans le milieu villageois en zone soudano-guinéenne du Bénin. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 20 (12). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/12/daho20211.htm

  10. EBEGBULEM VN. 2018. Prospects and challenges to guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) production in Nigeria. International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology. 3 (3): 182‒184. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijawb.2018.03.00083

  11. ELEROĞLU H, Yildirim A, Canikli A, Duman M, Bircan H. 2018. Analysis of growth curves of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) fed diets containing dry oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) in an organic system. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria. 45 (2):99-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v45i2.1833

  12. ELEROĞLU H, Yildirim A, Duman M, Okur N. 2016. Effect of eggshell color on the egg characteristics and hatchability of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) eggs. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0154

  13. FAO. 2014. Decision tools for family poultry development. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 16. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3542e.pdf

  14. FARIA PB, Bressan MC, Souza XR de, Rossato LV, Botega LMG, Gama LT da. 2010. Carcass and parts yield of broilers reared under a semi-extensive system. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 12 (3): 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516- 635X2010000300003

  15. GARCÍA, E. 2004. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Köppen, Serie Libros, núm. 6, Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, México. http://www.publicaciones.igg.unam.mx/index.php/ig/catalog/book/83

  16. GUERRERO LI, Pérez CML, Ponce AE. 2002. Curso práctico de tecnología de carnes y pescado. UAM, Unidad Iztapalapa. México, D.F. http://publicacionescbs.izt.uam.mx/DOCS/carnes.pdf

  17. GUTIÉRREZ-TRIAY MA, Segura-Correa JC, López-Burgos L, Santos-Flores J, Santos- Ricalde RH, Sarmiento-Franco L, Carvajal-Hernández M, Molina-Canul G. 2007. Características de la avicultura de traspatio en el municipio de Tetiz, Yucatán, México. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 7: 217 – 224. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/939/93970308.pdf

  18. HOFFMAN LC, Tlhong TM. 2012. Proximate and fatty acid composition and cholesterol content of different cuts of guinea fowl meat as affected by cooking method. Journal of Science of Food Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5682

  19. HOUNDONOUGBO PV, Mota RR, Chrysostome AAC, Bindelle J, Hammami H, Gengler N. 2017. Growth and carcass performances of guinea fowls reared under intensive system in Benin. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 29 (10). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd29/10/rrmo29193.html

  20. INEGI. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía e Informática. 2017. Anuario estadístico y geográfico de Chiapas. Pp. 736. ISBN 978-607-739-993-3. https://www.datatur.sectur.gob.mx/ITxEF_Docs/CHIS_ANUARIO_PDF.pdf

  21. ITZA-ORTIZ MF, Carrera-Chavéz JM, Castillo-Castillo Y, Ruíz-Barrera O, Aguilar-Urquiso E, Sangines-García JR. 2016. Caracterización de la avicultura de traspatio en una zona urbana de la frontera norte de México. Revista Científica. FCV-LUZ. 26(5):300-305. http://www.saber.ula.ve/handle/123456789/43067

  22. JUÁREZ A y Gutiérrez E. 2009. Control de cloequez y comportamiento productivo de guajolotas criollas. Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria. 13 (1): 59-70. http://ww.ucol.mx/revaia/portal/pdf/2009/enero/5.pdf

  23. KONÉ GA, Kouassi GF, Kouakou NDV, Kouba M. 2018. Diagnostic of guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) farming in Ivory Coast. Poultry Science. 97:4272–4278. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey290

  24. LARA LJ, Rostagno MH. 2013. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals. 3: 356-369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3020356

  25. MAREKO MHD, Nsoso SJ, Thibelang K. 2006. Preliminary carcass and meat characteristics og Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) raised on concrete and earth floors in Botswana. Journal of Food Technology. 4: 313-317. http://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=jftech.2006.313.317

  26. MUSUNDIRE MT, Halimani TE, Chimonyo M. 2017. Physical and chemical properties of meat from scavenging chickens and helmeted guinea fowls in response to age and sex. British Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1313961

  27. MUSUNDIRE MT., Halimani T.E., Chimonyo M. 2018. Effect of age and sex on carcass characteristics and internal organ weights of scavenging chickens and helmeted guinea fowls. Journal of Applied animal Research. 46: 860–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1411266

  28. NAHASHON SN, Aggrey SE, Adefope NA, Amenyenu A. 2006. Modeling growth characteristics of meat-type Guinea fowl. Poultry Science. 85: 943–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.5.943

  29. NORMA Oficial Mexicana. NOM-024-ZOO-1995. Especificaciones y características zoosanitarias para el transporte de animales, sus productos y subproductos, productos químicos, farmacéuticos, biológicos y alimenticios para uso en animales o consumo por éstos. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/202301/NOM-024-ZOO- 1995_161095.pdf

  30. NORMA Oficial Mexicana. NOM-033-ZOO-1995. Sacrificio humanitario de los animales domesticos y silvestres. México. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=5376424

  31. NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th Rev. edn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2114/nutrient-requirements-of-poultry-ninth-revised-edition- 1994

  32. OKE UK, Herbert U y Nwachukwu. 2004: Association between body weight and some egg production traits in the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris galeata. Pallas). Livestock Research for Rural Development. 16:72. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/9/oke16072.htm

  33. PAREDES AM., Romero CA, Torres RM, Vallejos FL, Mantilla GJ. 2019. Crecimiento y comportamiento reproductivo de la gallina criolla de huevos con cáscara verde de la provincia de Chota, Cajamarca. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 30 (2): 733-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v30i2.16070

  34. PORTER, T., E. Kebreab, H. Darmani Kuhi, S. Lopez, AB Strathe y J. France. 2010. Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poultry Science. 89: 371-378. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00141

  35. PREMAVALLI K, Ramamurthy N, Omprakash AV, Balakrishnan V, Appa Rao V, Natarajan A, Senthil Kumar RP. 2015. Influence of age on proximate composition of Guinea fowl meat. The Indian Veterinary Journal. 92 (6): 75-77. http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810045224

  36. REZAEI M, Yngvesson J, Gunnarsson S, Jönsson L, Wallenbeck A. 2018. Feed efficiency, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of a fast- and a slowergrowing broiler hybrid fed low- or high-protein organic diets. Organic Agriculture. 8:121– 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-017-0178-6

  37. SARICA M, Boz MA, Yamak US, Ucar A. 2019. Effect of production system and slaughter age on some production traits of guinea fowl: Meat quality and digestive traits. South African Journal of Animal Science. 49: 192-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i1.22

  38. SAS. Institute Inc. 2016. SAS/STAT® 14.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

  39. SEABO D, Moreki JC, Bagwasi N, Nthoiwa GP. 2011. Performance of Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) fed varying protein levels. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research. 1 (6): 255-258. http://www.ojafr.ir/main/attachments/article/80/OJAFR,%20A43,%20255- 258,%202011.pdf

  40. SEBOLA NA, Mlambo V, Mokoboki HK, Muchenje V. 2015. Growth performance and carcass characteristics of three chicken strains in response to incremental levels of dietary Moringa oleifera leaf meal. Livestock Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.04.019

  41. TUFARELLI V, Demauro R, Laudadio V. 2015. Dietary micronized-dehulled white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) in meat-type guinea fowls and its influence on growth performance, carcass traits and meat lipid profile. Poultry Science. 94:2388–2394. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev218




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com