medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Abanico Veterinario

ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2020; 10 (1)

Organization and grouping as a key axis to design attention schemes for goat farmers in northern Mexico: Case study

Ramos-Martinez J, Salinas-González H, Medina-Elizondo M, Figueroa-Viramontes U, Maldonado-Jáquez J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 46
Page: 1-19
PDF size: 774.44 Kb.


Key words:

goats, extensive system, technology transfer.

ABSTRACT

The present study aimed to organize and group goat farmers with similar socioeconomic and technological profiles to design targeted attention schemes according to their needs. The study consisted of two phases: As for the first phase, the socioeconomic and productive profile of the producers were stratified and characterized. In the second phase, goat producers' perceptions were considered to carry out the main problems and limitations of the production system. The data were analyzed through Multiple Correspondence Analysis. As a result, five groups of producers were identified: G1 with the highest milk production d-1 (p=0.03), the highest number of hectares susceptible to cultivation, and with the hectares sown (p‹0.0001); G2 with the highest educational level (p=0.0002); G3 compounded by elder people (p‹0.0001), with a great number of children (p‹0.0001), and without a difference in commercialization price; G4 compounded by elder people (p=0.0001) with inactivity time (p=0.0011), and, G5 with the highest number of children (p=0.0001), the highest flock size (p=0.03) with more hours dedicated to grazing (p=0.02). The analysis of Principal Components indicated, that, CP 1 and CP 2, presented the highest proportion of the variation (46.55%). Additionally, producers reported the main problems that limit their productivity. The stratification and grouping of goat farmers based on their similarities allowed defining critical points of attention, in such a way that strengthening policies towards these marginalized groups will easily fulfill their mission.


REFERENCES

  1. AGUDELO-GÓMEZ DA, Pelicioni-Savegnago R, Buzanskas ME, Ferraudo AS, Prado Munari D, Cerón-Muñoz MF. 2015. Genetic principal components for reproductive and productive traits in dual-purpose buffaloes in Colombia. Journal of Animal Science. 93: 3801-3809. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-8940

  2. AGUILAR A, Cabral A, Alvarado T. 2016. La Técnica del Proceso Administrativo Agropecuario Estratégico – PAAE Versión 2016. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios. 20(38): 209-216. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/141/14146082011.pdf

  3. ALVA-PÉREZ J, López-Corona LE, Zapata-Campos CC, Vázquez-Villanueva J, Barrios-García HB. 2018. Condiciones productivas y zoosanitarias de la producción caprina en el altiplano de Tamaulipas, México. Interciencia. 44(3): 154-160. https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/339/33958848008/33958848008.pdf

  4. BALESTRI L, Ferrán A, Giorgis A, Saravia C, Larrea A, Castaldo A, Poma K, Pariani A. 2001. La toma de decisiones en las empresas agropecuarias del norte de la provincia de la Pampa. Ciencia Veterinaria. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. UNLPam. 3(1):113-129. https://cerac.unlpam.edu.ar/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/1998/1954

  5. BALZARINI MG, González L, Tablada M, Casanoves F, Di Rienzo JA, Robledo CW. 2008. Manual del Usuario. Editorial Brujas. Córdoba, Argentina. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283491340_Infostat_manual_del_usuario

  6. BARRERA-PERALES OT, Sagarnaga-Villegas LM, Sala-González JM, Leso- Rodríguez JA, Santos-Lavalle R. 2018. Viabilidad económica de la ganadería caprina en San Luis Potosí, México. Mundo Agrario. 19(40): https://doi.org/10.24215/15155994e077

  7. BERNAL-GARCÍA J, Martínez MS, Sánchez-García J. 2003. Modelización de los factores más importantes que caracterizan un sitio en la red. XII Jornadas de ASEPUMA. Universidad de Murcia, España. 16 y 17 de septiembre de 2004. Pp: 1- 13. https://www.um.es/asepuma04/resumen/resumen_bernal_martinez_sanchez.pdf

  8. CÁRDENAS-BEJARANO E, Gallardo-López F, Núñez-Espinoza JF, Asiaín-Hoyos A, Rodríguez-Chessani MA, Velázquez-Beltrán LG. 2016. Redes de innovación en los grupos ganaderos de validación de transferencia de tecnología en México. Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo. 13: 237-255. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/asd/v13n2/1870- 5472-asd-13-02-00237.pdf

  9. CARRASCO-GONZÁLEZ A. 2004. Factores psicosociales y comportamientos de salud relacionados con el consumo de alcohol en adolecentes: un análisis multivariable. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. 36(1): 125–144. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/805/80536111.pdf

  10. CASTEL J, Mena Y, Delgado M, Camúñez J, Basulto J, Cavanca F, Guzmán J, Alcalde M. 2003. Characterization of semi-extensive goat production systems in southern Spain. Small Ruminant Research. 47: 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921- 4488(02)00250-X

  11. CHIPASHA H, Ariyawardana A, Mortlock MY. 2017. Smallholder goat farmer´s market participation in Choma district, Zambia. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 17(1): 11691-708. http://ajfand.net/Volume17/No1/Chipasha16175.pdf

  12. COFRÉ P. 2001. Producción de Cabras Lecheras. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias. Chillán, Chile. Boletín INA. No.66. Pp. 200.

  13. DUBEUF J. 2005. Structural, market and organizational conditions for developing goat dairy production systems. Small Ruminant Research. 60: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.015

  14. ESCAREÑO L, Salinas-González H, Wurzinger M, Iñiguez L, Sölkner J, Meza-Herrera C. 2012. Dairy goat production systems. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 45: 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0246-6

  15. ESCAREÑO SL, Wurzinger M, Pastor-López F, Salinas H, Johan S, Iñiguez L. 2011. La cabra y los sistemas de producción caprina de los pequeños productores de la Comarca Lagunera, en el norte de México. Rev. Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente. 17: 235-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2010.10.087

  16. ESCOBAR J, Bonilla-Jiménez FI. 2009. Grupos focales: Una guía conceptual y metodológica. Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología. 9(1): 51-67. http://biblioteca.udgvirtual.udg.mx:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/957/1/Gupos%20f ocales%20una%20gu%c3%ada%20conceptual%20y%20metodol%c3%b3gica.pdf

  17. FONSEKA WS, Mahusoon MM, Narmhikaa K, Inthujaa S. 2018a. Socio economic status and infrastructure availability of goat farmers in Eravur and Vantharumoolai Veterinary Ranges in Batticaloa district. International Journal of research Publications. 7(1). http://ijrp.org/paper_detail/268

  18. FONSEKA WS, Mahusoon MM, Narmhikaa K. 2018b. The rearing system of goats in Mahaoya Veterinary Range in Ampara district, Sri Lanka. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences. 17(12): 26-31. http://www.isca.in/IJBS/Archive/v7/i12/5.ISCA-IRJBS-2018-068.pdf

  19. GARCÍA-PÉREZ S. 2017. Las Empresas Agropecuarias y la Administración Financiera. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios. 40: 583-594. https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/141/14152127007/html/index.html

  20. GÓMEZ RJ. 2007. La caprinocultura como elemento articulador del desarrollo rural en el altiplano potosino. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. San Luis Potosí, México. http://ninive.uaslp.mx/xmlui/handle/i/2061

  21. GUERRA G. 1998. Manual de Administración de Empresas Agropecuarias. 2ª Edición. Editorial Agroamérica. San José, Costa Rica. ISBN 92-9039-181-2

  22. GUERRERO-CRUZ M. 2010. La caprinocultura en México, una estrategia de desarrollo. Revista Universitaria Digital de Ciencias Sociales. 1(1): 1-7. http://virtual.cuautitlan.unam.mx/rudics/?p=403

  23. HASSAN MM, Shaeef Z, Alam M, Hossain ME, Islam S, Uddin MB. 2016. Perception of smallholding goat farmers on disease conditions of goat in Bangladesh. International Journal of Natural Sciences. 6(1): 43-48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320417063_Perception_of_Smallholding_G oat_Farmers_on_Disease_conditions_of_Goat_in_Bangladesh

  24. HERNÁNDEZ-HERNÁNDEZ N, Garnica-González J. 2015. Árbol de Problemas del análisis al diseño y desarrollo de productos. Conciencia Tecnológica. 50: 38-46. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/944/94443423006.pdf

  25. HERNÁNDEZ-SAMPIERI R Fernández-Collado C, Baptista-Lucio P. 2006. Metodología de la investigación. Quinta edición. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana. https://www.esup.edu.pe/descargas/dep_investigacion/Metodologia%20de%20la%20 investigaci%C3%B3n%205ta%20Edici%C3%B3n.pdf

  26. HUNDAL JS, Singh U, Singh N, Kansal SK, Bhatti JS. 2016. Impact of training on knowledge level of goat farmers in Punjab. Haryana Vet. 55(1): 47-49. https://www.luvas.edu.in/haryana-veterinarian/download/harvet2016/10.pdf

  27. IFEANYICHUKWE US, Ezeano CI, Anozie R. 2018. Climate change adaptation coping strategies among sheep and goat farmers in Ivo local government area of Ebonyi state, Nigeria. Sustainability, Agri, Food and Environmental Research. 6(2): 50-68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327670176_Climate_change_and_Adaptati on_Coping_Strategies_among_Sheep_and_Goat_Farmers_in_Ivo_Local_Governme nt_Area_of_Ebonyi_State_Nigeria

  28. INAFED. Instituto Nacional para el Federalismo y Desarrollo Municipal. 2010. Enciclopedia de los municipios y delegaciones de México. http://www.inafed.gob.mx/work/enciclopedia/EMM05coahuila/.

  29. KUMAR S, Chauhan HS, Kide W, Mayekar AJ. 2015. Socio-economic profile of goat farmers in Western Uttar Pradesh (India). International Conference on Agriculture, Veterinary and Environmental Science. Organized by International Multidisciplinary Research Foundation, held At: Manorma Hotel Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh India 25- 26 July, 2015. 2(1): 43-46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299510803_SOCIOECONOMIC_ PROFILE_OF_GOAT_FARMERS_IN_WESTERN_UTTAR_PRADESH _INDIA

  30. MALDONADO-JÁQUEZ JA, Salinas-González H, Torres-Hernández G, Becerril-Pérez CM, Díaz-Rivera P. 2018. Factors influencing milk production of local goats in the Comarca Lagunera, México. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 30. No. Art.32. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/7/glat30132.html

  31. MENDOZA-JIMENEZ A, Ortega-Sánchez JL. 2009. Caracterización de la caprinocultura en el municipio de Tepelmeme, Villa de Morelos, Oaxaca, México. Revista Chapingo Serie Zonas Áridas. 8(1): 75-80. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4555/455545064011.pdf

  32. MONTALDO HH, Torres-Hernández G, Valencia-Posadas M. 2010. Goat breeding research in Mexico. Small Ruminant Research. 89: 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.039

  33. OKKYLA S, Dwijatmiko S, Kurnianto E. 2014. Path analysis of recording system innovation factors affecting adoption of goat farmers. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture. 39(1): 58-64. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.39.1.58-64

  34. PEÑA-MALAVERA A, Bruno C, Teich I, Fernandez E, Balzarini 2010. Análisis de conglomerados en la identificación de estructura genética a partir de datos de marcadores moleculares. Tumbaga. 1(5):225-237. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3628389

  35. RAJA T, Prabu M, Serma Saravana Pandian A, Thirunavukkarasu P. 2018. Factors influencing the constraints perceived by the small scale backyard goat farmers. International Journal of Livestock Research. 8(12): 175-181. https://www.ejmanager.com/mnstemps/68/68-1525773470.pdf?t=1587477289

  36. SAGARPA. Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería Recursos Naturales, Pesca y Alimentación. 2007. Programa Nacional Pecuario 2007-2012. http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/ganaderia/Publicaciones/Lists/Programa%20Nacional%2 0Pecuario/Attachments/1/PNP260907.pdf

  37. SAGARPA. Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería Recursos Naturales, Pesca y Alimentación. 2015. Cuestionario de evaluación al productor. Manual de buenas prácticas en producción de leche caprina. http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/ganaderia/Publicaciones/Lists/Manuales%20de%20Buen as%20Prcticas/Attachments/3/manual_cabra.pdf

  38. SALINAS-GONZÁLEZ H, Echavarría FG, Flores-Nájera MJ, Flores-Ortíz MA, Gutiérrez R, Rumayor A, Meza-Herrera CA, Pastor-López FJ. 2011. Participatory evaluation of goat technologies in semiarid North Central México. Rev. Chapingo Ciencias Forestales y del Medio Ambiente. 27: 225-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2010.11.106

  39. SALINAS-GONZÁLEZ H, Meza-Herrera CA, Escareño LM, Echavarría ChFG, Maldonado-Jáquez JA, Pastor-López FJ. 2015. Meat and milk production systems in goats: Productive trends in Mexico and the world, in: Díaz AE, Tórtora PJL, Palomares REG, Gutiérrez HJL (Eds.). Enfermedades de las Cabras, Libro Científico 1. INIFAP, México DF. Pp. 3-22. ISBN: 978-607-37-0411-3.

  40. SALINAS-GONZÁLEZ H, Valle-Moysen E, Santiago-Miramontes M, Veliz-Deras F, Maldonado-Jáquez JA, Vélez-Monroy L, Torres-Hernández D, Isidro-Requejo L, Figueroa-Viramontes U. 2016. Análisis descriptivo de unidades caprinas en el suroeste de la Región Lagunera, Coahuila, México. Interciencia. 44(11): 763-768. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/339/33948191006.pdf

  41. SANDHU SS, Malik DS, Kaswan S, Singh J, Singh Y. 2018. Feeding management practices adopted by goat farmers in South West Punjab and their constraints. International Journal of Livestock Research. 8(5): 271-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170828080418

  42. SANTIAGO J, Roussos A. 2010. El focus groups como técnica de investigación cualitativa. Documento de trabajo #256. Universidad de Belgrano. Disponible en: http://www.ub.edu.ar/investigaciones/dt_nuevos/256_roussos.pdf

  43. SANZ M, Fernández J, De la Torre G, Ramos E, Carmona F, Boza J. 2003. Calidad de la leche de los pequeños rumiantes. Anales de la Real Academia de Ciencias Veterinarias de Andalucía Oriental. 16(1): 155-166. http://racvao.es/wpcontent/ uploads/2014/12/Calidad-de-la-leche.pdf

  44. TANWAR PS. 2011. Constraints perceived by goat keepers in adoption of goat husbandry practices in semi-arid Rajasthan. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development. 6(1): 108-111. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326677491_Constraints_Perceived_by_Go at_Keepers_in_Adoption_of_Goat_Husbandry_Practices_in_Semi-Arid_Rajasthan

  45. TORRES-Hernández G, Maldonado-Jáquez JA, Salinas-González H, Becerril-Pérez C: 2016. Efecto del número de mediciones de la producción de leche en la estimación de la curva de lactancia en cabras locales de la Comarca Lagunera, México. Revista de Sistemas Experimentales. 3(7):22-26. http://www.ecorfan.org/bolivia/researchjournals/Sistemas_Experimentales/vol3num7/ Revista_Sistemas_Experimentales_V3_N7_4.pdf

  46. VATTA AF, de Villiers JF, Harrison LJS, Krecek RC, Pearson RA, Rijkenberg FHJ, Spickett A, Worth SH. 2010. Opportunities to train small-scale goat farmers within onfarm research projects. Advances in Animal Biosciences. 1(2): 504-504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040470010001202




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

AbanicoVet. 2020;10