medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Correo Científico Médico de Holguín

ISSN 1560-4381 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Correo Científico Médico 2020; 24 (2)

Axiological analysis of the perception of health risk

Lorenzo FDO, Vinardell LJC, Garrido TE, Gabriel AER, Torres GA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 460-479
PDF size: 223.26 Kb.


Key words:

risk perception, axiological approach, communication.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: in the solution of health problems, the application of Social Sciences, seen from an axiological perspective, oriented towards a conceptual renewal of Public Health plays a decisive role. The axiological approach and communicative competence, define the essentials to achieve a critical citizen awareness, contributing to the development of risk perception, to improve the health of the population.
Objective: to analyze from the axiological perspective the perception of the risk in health, to favor the modification of the modes of action in the current circumstances.
Method: a materialistic dialectical analysis was carried out with a critical vision of risk perception, based on the literature review and documentary compilations, from multiple approaches, aimed at the conceptual renewal of Public Health from an axiological perspective. Theoretical and empirical methods were used, with the objective of providing budgets for the attention to the vulnerabilities identified in the community scenarios.
Results: the axiological perspective of risk perception is novel for research and scientific praxis in health. It contributes to the development of a critical awareness towards the improvement of the environment. The significance of communicative competence, the appropriate use of information sources and their interpretation are appreciated. The need to carry out studies from a conception that axiological reflect criteria and concerns of the population is highlighted.
Conclusions: the axiological approach to risk perception is a priority in health services. Communication becomes a mediator for the process of study and decision making, fosters learning environments and a critical awareness, for individual and collective insertion, manifests itself in the transformation of society from its surroundings.


REFERENCES

  1. Rojas Ochoa F. El componente social de la salud pública en el siglo XXI. Escuela Nacional de Salud Pública. La Habana: ENSAP; 2018.

  2. Canadá: Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Salud de la Población. Conceptos y estrategias para las políticas públicas saludables: la perspectiva canadiense. Washington: OPS, 2000.

  3. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Últimos adelantos técnicos en la prevención y el control del dengue en la Región de las Américas. Informe de reunión. 28 - 29 /05/2014, Washington.

  4. Reis RB, Ribeiro GS, Felzemburgh RD, Santana FS, Astrid SM, Queiroz A.et. al. Impact of Environment and Social Gradient on Leptospira Infection in Urban Slums. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008 [citado 15/10/ 2019];2(4):228.Disponible en: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0000228&type=printable

  5. Martínez Calvo S. Uso y abuso del término percepción de riesgo. Rev Cubana Salud Pública. 2017 [citado 15/10/ 2019];43 (3): 1-7 Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rcsp/v43n3/spu08317.pdf

  6. Fingermann G. Lógica y teoría del conocimiento. Buenos Aires: Ateneo; 1989. Green J. Is it time for the sociology of health to abandon 'risk'? .Health Risk Soc. 2009 [citado 15/10/ 2019];11(6):493-508.Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698570903329474

  7. Aguilera M, Pindado J. Nuevas enfoques en comunicación y salud: perspectivas de investigación. Comunicar. 2006 [citado 15/10/ 2019]; 26:13-20. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28222737_Nuevos_enfoques_en_comunicacion_y_salud_perspectivas_de_investigacion/link/00b7d528b791cf16a2000000/download

  8. Carvalho Mesquita JR. Acerca del riesgo. Para comprender la epidemiología. Buenos Aires: Lugar; 2005

  9. Lima Pereira P, Tullo E. Percepción de riesgo ante eventos de salud urbana en trabajadores de epidemiología en Paraguay .RCyS. 2017[citado 15/10/ 2019]; 7(1): 61-79.Disponible en: http://www.revistadecomunicacionysalud.es/index.php/rcys/article/view/60

  10. García del Castillo JA. Concepto de percepción de riesgo y su repercusión en las adicciones. Salud Drogas. 2012[citado 15/10/ 2019];12(2):133-151. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4098672

  11. Locke J. Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. Madrid: Ed. Nacional, 1980.

  12. Alcolea Rodríguez JR; Placeres Collot M; García Noroña AG; Valera Barón T. Reflexión y Debate Valores humanistas. Encargo de la sociedad cubana a la Universidad Médica del siglo XXI. Multimed. 2012 [citado 15/10/ 2019];16(1):1 31. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/multimed/mul 2012/mul121r.pdf

  13. Rojas MB. La axiología como eje transversal, en la gestión del talento humano. Rev Educación Valores. 2007 [citado 15/10/ 2019];1(7): 1-5.Disponile en: https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/revista-educacion-en-valores/articulo/la-axiologia-como-eje-transversal-en-la-gestion-del-talento-humano

  14. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Number of Reported Cases of Chikungunya Fever in the Americas, by Country or Territory (to week noted) Epidemiological Week 2015 / EW. Disponible en : https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2015/2015-oct-2-cha-CHIKV-cases-ew-40.pdf

  15. Covello V, Merkhoher M. Risk Assessment Methods: Approaches for Assessing Health and Environmental Risks. New York: Springer, 1993.

  16. Zabala MC. Desarrollo social y equidad. Los determinantes de la salud en Cuba. De lo conceptual a lo local. La Habana: Convención Salud; 2015.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Correo Científico Médico. 2020;24