medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica Sinergia

Revista Médica Sinergia
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 01

<< Back Next >>

Revista Médica Sinergia 2021; 6 (01)

Odontoides fracture and types of surgical treatment

San Lee RL, Araya RE, González ADE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 1-13
PDF size: 337.81 Kb.


Key words:

odontoid process, instrumentation, spine, injuries, classification.

ABSTRACT

Odontoid fracture occurs in a high percentage of all cervical spine fractures. In two opposite age groups, young adults for high-energy trauma and older adults for low-energy trauma. Diagnosis is performed with imaging studies which allow the Aderson and D`Alonzo classification to be applied to the types of odontoid fractures. This classification is used in clinical practice as a treatment guide; together with specific indications, it is possible to determine cases of surgical management. According to the criteria, the most appropriate for each case is chosen from the different surgical approaches. Surgical techniques as treatment of odontoid fracture, have advantages and disadvantages for the recovery of the patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Wang L, Liu C, Zhao Q, Tian J. Outcomes of surgery for unstable odontoid fractures combined with instability of adjacent segments. J Orthop Surg Res [Internet]. 2014 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 9:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0064-9

  2. Joaquim AF, Patel AA. Surgical treatment of Type II odontoid fractures: anterior odontoid screw fixation or posterior cervical instrumented fusion? Neurosurg Focus [Internet]. 2015 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 38(4):E11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14781

  3. Yang S, Lui YJ, Jiang WM. Experience in surgery treatment of type Ⅱ odontoid fractures: A report of two cases and review of the literature. Chinese Journal of Traumatology [In press]. 2019; [aprox. 6 p.]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.10.003

  4. Bin Ni, Qunfeng Guo. “Posterior Reduction and Temporary Fixation for Odontoid Fracture”. Spine Surgery 2015, volumen 40, Número 3, pp E168-E174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000709

  5. Jun Shinbo, Hiroki Sameda. “Simultaneeous anterior and posterior screw fixation confined to the axis for stabilization of a 3-part fracture of the axis (odontoid, dens, ang hangman fracture)” J Neurosurg Spine 20:265- 269,2014. http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2013.12.SPINE12448

  6. Koné N, Haidara A, Giamundo M, Rusconi A. Management of Type II Fracture OBAV: About A series of 5 cases and Literature Review. Int J Surg Surgical Porced [Internet]. 2018 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 3:130. http://doi.org/10.15344/2456-4443/2018/130

  7. Goel A, Jain S, Shah A, Patil A, Vutha R, Ranjan S, et al. Atlantoaxial Fixation for Odontoid Fracture: Analysis of 124 Surgically Treated Cases. World Neurosurgery [Internet]. 2018 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 110: 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.192

  8. Shen Y, Miao J, Li C, Fang L, Cao S, Zhang M, et al. A meta-analysis of the fusion rate from surgical treatment for odontoid fractures: anterior odontoid screw versus posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis” Eur Spine J [Internet]. 2015 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 24(8):1649-1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3893-2

  9. Yuan S, Wei B, Tian Y, Yan J, Xu W, Wang L, et al. The comparison of clinical outcome of fresh type II odontoid fracture treatment between anterior cannulated screws fixation and posterior instrumentation of C1-2 without fusion: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research [Internet]. 2018 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 13:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0702-0

  10. Guo Q, Deng Y, Wang J, Wang L, Lu X, Guo X, et al. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes os Posterior C1-C2 Temporary Fixation Without and C1-C2 Fusion for Fresh Odontoid Fractures. Neurosurgery [Internet]. 2016 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 78(1): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001006

  11. Maciejczak A, Wolan-Nieroda A, Jabłońska-Sudoł K. Comparison of fusión rates between rod-based laminar claw hook and posterior cervical screw construct in Type II odontoid fractures. Injury [Internet]. 2015 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 46(7):1304-1310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.042

  12. Waschke A, Berger-Roscher N, Kielstein H, Ewald C, Kalff R, Hans-Joachim W. Cement Augmented Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation is Biomechanically Advantageous in Osteoporotic Patients With Anderson Type II Fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech [Internet]. 2015 [citado fecha de acceso]; 28(3): E126-E132. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000177

  13. Lin B, Lu C, Yu H, Zhang W, Yang W. Comparison of microendoscopis discectomy system and anterior open approach in treatment of unstable odontoid fracture with cannulated screw internal fixation. Acta Orthop. Belg [Internet]. 2014 [citado: fecha de acceso]; 80(4):529-36. PMID: 26280726

  14. Cho EJ, Kim SH, Kim WH, Jin SW, Lee SH, Kim BJ, Ha SG, Kim SD, Lim DJ. Clinical Results of Odontoid Fractures according to a Modified, Treatment-Oriented Classification. Korean J Spine. 2017 Jun;14(2):44-49. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2017.14.2.44. Epub 2017 Jun 30. PMID: 28704908; PMCID: PMC5518434. https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2017.14.2.44

  15. Zhu C, Wang L, Liu H, Song Y, Liu L, Li T, et al. Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fracture With a Novel Technique: Titanium Cable-Dragged Reduction and Cantilever-Beam Internal Fixation. Medicine [Internet]. 2017 [citado: fecha de https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008521




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Médica Sinergia. 2021;6