medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2021; 81 (1)

TOT sling adjustment: is it worth it?

Malizia-Reynoso EA, Olmedo JJ, Racca ML, Quinteros LM, Dellavedova T, Minuzzi S
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 1-7
PDF size: 173.66 Kb.


Key words:

Stress urinary incontinence, Adjustable sling, Safyre, Postoperative urinary obstruction.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Since its introduction, the TOT sling rapidly became a safe and effective option for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. The development of the adjustable TOT sling enabled the tape to be repositioned, in cases with suboptimum results (persistent SUI).
Objectives: To analyze the overall results of our case series, in terms of functional success and postoperative complications, as well as the relation between sling adjustment and the development of postoperative urinary obstruction, mesh erosion, pelvic pain, and dissatisfaction with the tape’s silicone columns.
Materials and Methods: A comparative, retrospective analysis was carried out on patients that underwent adjustable TOT sling placement, within the time frame of 2006 and 2016, assessing a subgroup of patients that had sling repositioning as a second procedure. The variables analyzed were sling adjustment, mesh erosion, complication related to the tape’s silicone columns, development of postoperative urinary obstruction, and functional success of the surgery.
Results: Seventy patients that underwent adjustable TOT sling placement were selected (SUI cured in 84.3%; postoperative obstruction in 22.8%). Slings were repositioned in 11 (15.7%) patients due to adverse functional results, raising the SUI cure rate to 92.8% and the post-adjustment obstruction rate to 28.5%. There was a significant association between sling adjustment and the development of pelvic pain (36% vs 10%, p=0.02) and no significant differences between groups, regarding the development of postoperative urinary obstruction (p=0.23), erosion into the vagina (p=0.78), erosion into the bladder (p=0.39), and dissatisfaction with the tape’s silicone columns (p=0.9).
Conclusion: The possibility of increasing the functional success of a first surgery, within a few minutes and with local anesthesia, together with the fact that there were no significant differences in the majority of the complications analyzed, make tape adjustment a useful complement in the treatment of SUI, which is not possible with conventional slings.


REFERENCES

  1. Schultheis D. A brief history of urinary incontinence and its treatment. In: Incontinence. Francia: Health Publications Ltd; 2009. p. 1981.

  2. Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1990;153:7–31. doi: 10.1111/ j.1600-0412.1990.tb08027.x

  3. Delorme E. [Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women]. Prog Urol. 2001;11(6):1306–13.

  4. Patel R, Nitti VW. Bladder outlet obstruction in women: Prevalence, recognition, and management. Curr Urol Rep. 2001;2(5):379–87. doi: 10.1007/s11934-996-0024-y

  5. Palma P, Riccetto C, Herrmann V, Dambros M, Thiel M, Bandiera S, et al. Transobturator SAFYRE sling is as effective as the transvaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(6):487–91. doi: 10.1007/ s00192-005-1309-2

  6. Lee Y-S, Lee HN, Lee K-S. The evolution of surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence: era of mid-urethral slings. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(4):223–32. doi: 10.4111/ kju.2010.51.4.223

  7. Alhasso A, Bekarma H. Synopsis in the Management of Urinary Incontinence. 2017.

  8. Schimpf MO, Rahn DD, Wheeler TL, Patel M, White AB, Orejuela FJ, et al. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):71.e1-71.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.030

  9. Palma PCR, Riccetto CLZ, Dambros M, Thiel M, Fraga R de, Tamanini JTN, et al. Safyre: Un nuevo concepto de cabestrillo ajustable mínimamente invasivo para la incontinencia urinaria por estrés femenina. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2004;28(10):749–55.

  10. Tanuri ALS, Feldner PC, Bella ZIKJ-D, Castro RA, Sartori MGF, Girão MJBC. [Retropubic and transobturator sling in treatment of stress urinary incontinence]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010;56(3):348–54. doi: 10.1590/ s0104-42302010000300022

  11. Tran H, Rutman M. Female Outlet Obstruction After Anti-incontinence Surgery. Urology. 2018;112:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j. urology.2017.08.041

  12. Kubin N, Shkarupa D, Staroseltseva O, Zaytseva A, Pisarev A, Shapovalova E. The new paradigm of stress urinary incontinence treatment: adjustable sling for all cases. ics. org. 2017




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2021;81