medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2020; 21 (2)

Recommendations of the Mexican Association of Robotic Surgery for the reactivation of robotic assisted surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

Kuri OJA, Solórzano AJJ, Aguirre GMP, Cuendis VA, Galeana NFI, Luján MKI, Rivas LR, Vela SI, Villeda SCI
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/98913

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/98913
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/98913

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 92-99
PDF size: 184.05 Kb.


Key words:

Robotic surgery, reactivation, recommendation, COVID-19.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To determine the risk of COVID-19 transmission during minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgical procedures and to establish recommendations for the reactivation of robotic surgery in Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The statements of the national and international surgical societies were reviewed on the risk of COVID-19 transmission during robotic and minimally invasive procedures. In addition, the available literature on COVID-19 and other viral transmissions in CO2 plume, as well as the presence of aerosolized viruses created by electrocautery during these procedures, was reviewed. The recommendations of the societies were compared with the available literature on the subject to create our recommendations for the reactivation of robotic-assisted surgery in Mexico. Results: Recommendations promulgated by various surgical societies evolved over time as more information on COVID-19 transmission became available. There is no evidence of the presence of COVID-19 in the aerosol created by electrocautery or CO2 during robotic or minimally invasive surgery. Technologies exist to reduce the release of CO2 pneumoperitoneum in the operating room, as well as to filter viral particles, which should reduce the risk of exposure of operating room personnel. The preoperative protocol requires negative imaging with computed axial tomography and RT-PCR-SARS-CoV-2 prior to the surgical procedure to guarantee the safety of the patient and the health personnel. Conclusions: Reactivation of robotic surgery is possible during the COVID-19 pandemic as long as protection supplies, strict preoperative protocols are guaranteed, and the adherence to the recommendations outlined in detail within this document is taken in place.


REFERENCES

  1. Pryor A. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. SAGES and EAES recommendations regarding surgical response to COVID-19 crisis. March 30, 2020. Available in: https://www.sages.org/recommendations-surgical-response-covid-19/.

  2. The Royal College of Surgeons. Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance on COVID-19 Update. 27 March 2020. Available in: https://www.rcsed.ac.uk/news-publicaffairs/news/2020/march/intercollegiate-general-surgery-guidance-on-covid-19-update.

  3. Porter J, Blau E, Gharagozloo F, Martino M, Cerfolio R, Duvvuri U et al. Society of Robotic Surgery review: recommendations regarding the risk of COVID-19 transmission during minimally invasive surgery. BJU Int. 2020; 126: 225-234. doi: 10.1111/bju.15105.

  4. Rioux M, Garland A, Webster D, Reardon E. HPV positive tonsillar cancer in two laser surgeons: case reports. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 42: 54.

  5. Gloster HM Jr, Roenigk RK. Risk of acquiring human papillomavirus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995; 32: 436-441.

  6. Kwak HD, Kim SH, Seo YS, Song KJ. Detecting hepatitis B virus in surgical smoke emitted during laparoscopic surgery. Occup Environ Med. 2016; 73: 857-863.

  7. Zheng MH, Boni L, Fingerhut A. Minimally invasive surgery and the novel coronavirus outbreak: lessons learned in China and Italy. Ann Surg. 2020; 272: e5-e6.

  8. Coccolini F, Tartaglia D, Puglisi A, Giordano C, Pistello M, Lodato M et al. SARS-CoV-2 is present in peritoneal fluid in COVID-19 patients. Ann Surg. 2020; 272: e240-e242.

  9. Ngaserin SH, Koh FH, Ong BC, Chew MH. COVID-19 not detected in peritoneal fluid: a case of laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendicitis in a COVID-19-infected patient. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020; 405: 353-355.

  10. Wölfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S, Müller MA et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020; 581: 465-469.

  11. To KK, Tsang OT, Leung WS et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. pii: S1473-3099(20)30196-1. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1.

  12. Wu F, Wang A, Liu M et al. Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a COVID-19 recovered patient cohort and their implications. medRxiv. 2020: 2020.03.30.20047365.

  13. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Spijker R, Taylor-Phillips S et al. Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 6: CD013652.

  14. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Statement-COVID-19, Restarting Elective Surgery. Available in: https://www.figo.org/covid-19-restarting-elective-surgery.

  15. American College of Surgeons. Local resumption of elective surgery guidance. April 2020. Available in: https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance/resuming-elective-surgery

  16. Mottrie A. ERUS (EAU Robotic Urology Section) Guidelines During COVID-19 Emergency. 2020. Available in: https://uroweb.org/eau-robotic-urology-section-erus-guidelines-duringcovid-19-emergency/.

  17. Prachand VN, Milner R, Angelos P, Posner MC, Fung JJ, Agrawal N et al. Medically necessary, time-sensitive procedures: scoring system to ethically and efficiently manage resource scarcity and provider risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 231: 281-288.

  18. Lei S, Jiang F, Su W, Chen C, Chen J, Mei W et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection. EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 21: 100331.

  19. Sethuraman N, Jeremiah SS, Ryo A. "Interpreting diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2". JAMA. 2020; 323: 2249-2251.

  20. Watson J, Whiting PF, Brush JE. Interpreting a covid-19 test result. BMJ. 2020; 369: m1808.

  21. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020; 296: E32-E40.

  22. Wang Y, Dong C, Hu Y, Li C, Ren Q, Zhang X et al. Temporal changes of CT findings in 90 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a longitudinal study. Radiology. 2020; 296: E55-E64.

  23. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1564-1567.

  24. American Society of Anesthesiologists. COVID-19 information for healthcare professionals. 2020.

  25. Wax RS, Christian MD. Practical recommendations for critical care and anesthesiology teams caring for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) patients. Can J Anaesth. 2020; 67: 568-576.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2020;21