medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2020; 21 (2)

Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy post-chemotherapy for testicular germ cell tumor

Cendejas-Gómez JJ, Sandoval BH, Almeida MR, Ortega GME, Esqueda SD, Villeda SCI
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/98915

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/98915
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/98915

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 104-108
PDF size: 254.83 Kb.


Key words:

Lymph node dissection, testicular cancer, robotic surgery, case report.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Testicular cancer is a common pathology among men between 20 and 35 years old. After first-line treatment for retroperitoneal disease with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP), only 6-10% of the residual masses of non-seminomatous tumors will have active cancer. Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of post-chemotherapy residual masses is a feasible option. Case report: 17-year-old man with a history of a mixed left testicular tumor with a 3.1 × 3.7 × 5.3 cm retroperitoneal residual mass after chemotherapy seen on PET/CT. The patient underwent tumor resection with a robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. A total of five ports were placed in the abdomen and then the four robotic arms were docked. Initially, the Told line was incised, and the descending colon was mobilized medially. The left ureter and the gonadal vein were identified. Then, the residual mass was identified in the paraaortic and infrarenal area. Then, the dissection of the pre-aortic and paraaortic ganglionar packs was performed, taking the left ureter as the lateral edge of the dissection and the renal vein as the upper limit. Superficial sympathetic fibers and hypogastric plexus were preserved. The surgical time was 240 minutes and the bleeding was 150 mL. Postoperative course was uneventful, with early resumption of daily activities and with very good aesthetic result. Conclusion: The robot-assisted laparoscopic approach in this case, offered an adequate oncological, functional and aesthetic result, avoiding the morbidity associated with open surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Carver BS, Serio AM, Bajorin D, Motzer RJ, Stasi J, Bosl GJ et al. Improved clinical outcome in recent years for men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 5603-5608.

  2. Cancer Today [Internet]. [Citado el 6 de julio de 2020]. Disponible en: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home

  3. European Association of Urology. Testicular cancer [Internet]. Uroweb. [Citado el 2 de julio de 2020]. Disponible en: https://uroweb.org/guideline/testicular-cancer/#7

  4. Partin AW, Peters CA, Kavoussi LR, Dmochowski RR, Wein AJ. Neoplasms of the testis. In: Campbell Walsh Wein urology. 12th ed. Canada: Elsevier; 2020. pp. 1680-710.

  5. Hale GR, Teplitsky S, Truong H, Gold SA, Bloom JB, Agarwal PK. Lymph node imaging in testicular cancer. Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 7: 864-874.

  6. Mittakanti HR, Porter JR. Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a minimally invasive surgical approach for testicular cancer. Transl Androl Urol. 2020; 9: S66-S73.

  7. Stepanian S, Patel M, Porter J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: evolution of the technique. Eur Urol. 2016; 70: 661-667.

  8. Faria EF, Neves HS, Dauster B, Machado RD, Magnabosco WJ, Muller RL et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a safe procedure for postchemotherapy residual mass in testicular cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018; 28: 168-173.

  9. Rukstalis DB, Chodak GW. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a patient with stage 1 testicular carcinoma. J Urol. 1992; 148: 1907-1909; discussion 1909-1910.

  10. Davol P, Sumfest J, Rukstalis D. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology. 2006; 67: 199.

  11. Singh A, Chatterjee S, Bansal P, Bansal A, Rawal S. Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: Feasibility and outcome in post-chemotherapy residual mass in testicular cancer. Indian J Urol. 2017; 33: 304-309.

  12. Kamel MH, Littlejohn N, Cox M, Eltahawy EA, Davis R. Post-chemotherapy robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: institutional experience. J Endourol. 2016; 30: 510-519.

  13. Overs C, Beauval JB, Mourey L, Rischmann P, Soulié M, Roumiguié M et al. Robot-assisted post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in germ cell tumor: is the single-docking with lateral approach relevant? World J Urol. 2018; 36: 655-661.

  14. Beck SDW, Peterson MD, Bihrle R, Donohue JP, Foster RS. Short-term morbidity of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary group of patients. J Urol. 2007; 178: 504-506; discussion 506.

  15. Williams SB, McDermott DW, Winston D, Bahnson E, Berry AM, Steele GS et al. Morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: contemporary perioperative data. BJU Int. 2010; 105: 918-921.

  16. Subramanian VS, Nguyen CT, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA. Complications of open primary and post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Urol Oncol. 2010; 28: 504-509.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 5
Table 1

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2020;21