medigraphic.com
ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2020; 21 (2)

First robotic hysterectomy in Mexico for a benign gynecological pathology, performed at the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Zumpango

Carmona OMP, Rivera HM, Gutiérrez HLR, Flores RGA, González SJR

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 109-113
PDF size: 203.57 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Since its approval by the FDA in 2005, robot-assisted surgery has been incorporated into the field of gynecological surgery. Robotic technology is a novel and innovative minimally invasive approach with proven feasibility in gynecological and reproductive surgery. Case report: 41-year-old patient diagnosed with uterine myomatosis and chronic pelvic pain. This report describes the first hysterectomy with preservation of adnexa and robot-assisted laparoscopic presacral neurectomy in Mexico, performed at the Regional Hospital of High Specialty of Zumpango. Conclusion: Robotic hysterectomy is considered an alternative surgical approach in patients with benign gynecological pathology.


REFERENCES

  1. Arcos Vera B, Arcos Vera D, Flores Rangel GA. Histerectomía total laparoscópica por miomatosis uterina. Rev Fac Med UNAM. 2018; 61, pp. 29-36.

  2. Murillo IJM, Pedraza GLA, Aguirre OX et al. Histerectomía por laparoscopia: experiencia de 10 años en el Hospital Español de México. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2007; 75: 667-677.

  3. Hollman-Montiel JP, Rodríguez AG. Complicaciones de la histerectomía total abdominal ginecológica por patología benigna. Arch Inv Mat Inf. 2014; 6: 25-30.

  4. Guías de Práctica Clínica. Indicaciones y contraindicaciones de la histerectomía en mujeres con patología benigna en el segundo nivel de atención. 2017.

  5. Villavicencio Mavrich H. Cirugía laparoscópica avanzada robótica Da Vinci: origen, aplicación clínica actual en Urología y su comparación con la cirugía abierta y laparoscópica. Actas Urol Esp. 2006; 30: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(06)73389-7.

  6. Rojas TI, Larraín de la C D, Marengo F, González LF, Prado AJ, Buckel GH. Uso rutinario del montaje lateral (side-docking) en cirugía robótica ginecológica: estudio de factibilidad. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2012; 77: 428-433. doi: 10.4067/s0717-75262012000600004.

  7. Advincula AP, Wang K. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009; 16: 291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.003.

  8. Moreno-Portillo M, Valenzuela-Salazar C, Quiroz-Guadarrama CD et al. Cirugía robótica. Gac Med Mex. 2014; 150: 293-297. doi: 10.4067/s0718-40262012000100016.

  9. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg. 2006; 191: 555-560. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.011.

  10. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schär G. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 604-611. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265b61a.

  11. Albright BB, Witte T, Tofte AN, Chou J, Black JD, Desai VB et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.003.

  12. Billfeldt NK, Borgfeldt C, Lindkvist H, Stjerndahl JH, Ankardal M. A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 222: 113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.019.

  13. Committee opinion no. 628: robotic surgery in gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 760-767. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000461761.47981.07.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com