medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSan

ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 04

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2020; 24 (04)

Usefulness of the amniotic membrane in the scaring process

Piñera MM, Rodríguez SO, Del Valle PS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 700-706
PDF size: 623.22 Kb.


Key words:

amniotic membrane, pressure ulcer, septic surgical wound, scaring of wounds.

ABSTRACT

The case reports of two patients admitted to Saturnino Lora Teaching Clinical Surgical Provincial Hospital in Santiago de Cuba are described: an old man that received a coronary revascularization in the Cardiovascular Surgery Service and presented infection of the surgical site, as well as suture material rejection; and a young adult woman assisted in the Intensive Cares Unit due to a bacterial endocarditis, who after two months of hospitalization developed a grade III pressure ulcer in the sacral region, with a diameter of 8 cm and bony exposure. In these patients all the established therapeutic protocols had been implemented according to the type of disorder, but if there is no healing of the lesions, it was decided to apply amniotic membrane dressings, with which there was a favorable clinical course and the scaring of the wounds was achieved.


REFERENCES

  1. Fairbairn NG, Randolph MA, Redmond RW. The clinical applications of human amnion in plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(5):662-75.

  2. Martínez-Méndez JR, Serracanta-Domènech J, Monclús-Fuertes E, Pérez del Caz D, López-Suso E, García-Contreras JD, et al. Guía clínica de consenso en el uso de desbridamiento enzimático en quemaduras con NexoBrid®. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam. 2017 [citado 10/11/2019];43(2):193-202. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922017000200012

  3. Sampietro-De-Luis JM, López-Cabrera P, Bernal-Martínez ÁJ, Yuste-Benavente V, Agulló-Domingo A, et al. Experiencia con Nexobrid® para el desbridamiento enzimático de quemaduras faciales seguido de tratamiento conservador con Medihoney®. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam. 2016 [citado 10/11/2019];42(3):217-25. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922016000300002

  4. Vloemans AF, Hermans MH, van der Wal MB, Liebregts J, Middelkoop E. Optimal treatment of partial thick ness burns in children: a systematic review. Burns. 2014;40(2):177-90.

  5. Gaviria-Castellanos JL, Gómez-Ortega V, Guerrero-Serrano L. Manejo de quemaduras faciales de segundo grado con membrana amniótica preservada en glicerol 85 %. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam. 2018;44(4):401-8.

  6. de Rötth A. Plastic repair of conjunctival defects with fetal membranes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1940;23(3):522–5.

  7. Xie HT, Zhao D, Liu Y, Zhang MC. Umbilical cord patch transplantation for corneal perforations and descemetoceles. J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun [citado 10/11/2019]. Disponible en: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/joph/2017/2767053.pdf

  8. Westekemper H, Figueiredo FC, Siah WF, Wagner N, Steuhl KP, Meller D. Clinical outcomes of amniotic membrane transplantation in the management of acute ocular chemical injury. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(2):103-7.

  9. Grau AE, Durán JA. Treatment of a large corneal perforation with a multilayer of amniotic membrane and TachoSil. Cornea. 2012;31(1):98–100.

  10. Dantzer E. Indicaciones de los sustitutos cutáneos y de los aloinjertos. EMC Cirugía Plástica Reparadora y Estética. 2015;23(1):1-14.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

MediSan. 2020;24