medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2020; 34 (6)

Anterior ankle impingement: follow-up in 52 cases

Cuellar-Avaroma A, Doger-Echegaray P, King-Martínez A
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/99136

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/99136
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/99136

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 382-387
PDF size: 165.28 Kb.


Key words:

Anterior, impingement, ankle, arthroscopy, treatment.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The anterior ankle impingement is a common pathology. It is mostly seen in athletes. Pain in the anterior portion of the ankle and limitation in the ankle's dorsiflexion are the most common symptoms. These lesions are commonly preceded by an inversion movement most commonly during soccer. Material and methods: This is a observational, descriptive, prospective and longitudinal study of 52 consecutive patients with anterior ankle impingement in whom an anterior ankle arthroscopy was perform. The objective is to know the clinical follow-up at least one year. We evaluated numeric pain scale, functional outcomes and personal satisfaction. Results: Of the 52 patients, we had 36 males, and 16 females. Pain scale moved from 5.75 to 0.98 points. The AOFAS scale moved from 73.65 preoperative to 92.98 postoperatively the SFMCP scale went form 72.44 preoperative to 94.48 postop. 23 patients (44.23%) returned to there previous level of sport with in four to seven months form the intervention. Conclusions: Arthroscopic treatment of the anterior ankle impingement showed significant improvement to 12 months of follow-up. The return to sports activity at the same level prior to the injury was four to seven months.


REFERENCES

  1. Ahn JY, Choi HJ, Lee WC. Talofibular bony impingement in the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36(10): 1150-5.

  2. Bauer T, Breda R, Hardy P. Anterior ankle bony impingement with joint motion loss: the arthroscopic resection option. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 96(4): 462-8.

  3. Keller K, Nasrilari M, Filler T, Jerosch J. The anterior tibio-talar ligament: one reason for the anterior ankle impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 225-32.

  4. Buda R, BaldassarriM, Parma A, Cavallo M, Pagliazzi G, Castagnini F, et al. Arthoscopic treatment and prognostic classification o anterior soft tissue impingement of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37(1): 33-9.

  5. Ferkel RD, Scranton PE. Arthroscopy of the ankle and foot: current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993; 75A: 1233-42.

  6. Kim SH, HA KI. Arthrsocopic treatment of impingement of the anterolateral soft tissues of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82: 1019-21.

  7. Liu SH, Raskin A, Osti L, Baker C, Jacobson K, Finerman G, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of anterolateral ankle impingement. Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 215-8.

  8. Scranton PE, McDermott JE. Anterior tibio-talar spurs. A comparison of open versus arthroscopic debridement. Foot Ankle. 1992; 13(3): 125-9.

  9. Jordan 3rd LK, Helms CA, Cooperman AE, Speer KP. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in anterolateral impingement of the ankle. Skeletal Radiol. 2000; 29(1): 34-9.

  10. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15(7): 349-53.

  11. Kleiger B. Anterior tibiotalar impingement syndromes in dancers. Foot Ankle. 1982; 3: 69-73.

  12. Lee JW, Suh JS, Huh YM, Moon ES, Kim SJ. Soft tissue impingement syndrome of the ankle: Diagnostic efficacy of MRI and clinical results after arthroscopic treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25(12): 896-902.

  13. Molloy S, Solan MC, Bendall SP. Sinovial impingement in the ankle. A new physical sign. J Bone Joint Sur Br. 2003; 85: 330-3.

  14. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Gilbart MK, Chorney K. Chronic pain following ankle sprains in athletes: the role of arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 1997; 13(5): 564-74.

  15. Robinson P, White LM. Soft-tissue and osseous impingement syndrome of the ankle: rol of imaging in diagnosis and a management. Radiographics. 2002; 22(6): 1457-69.

  16. Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002; 22(5): 1223-46.

  17. Meislin RJ, Rose DJ, Parisien JS, Springer S. Arthroscopic treatment of synovial impingement of the ankle. Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21(2): 186-9.

  18. Tol JL, Van Dijk CN. Etiology of the anterior ankle impingement syndrome: a descriptive anatomical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25: 382-6.

  19. Urgüden M, Söyüncü Y, Ozdemir H, Sekban H, Feyyaz AF, Turan AA. Arthroscopic debridement of anterolateral soft tissue impingement of the ankle: evaluation of factors affecting outcome. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 317-322.

  20. Van Dijk CN. Anterior and posterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006; 11(3): 663-83.

  21. Likert R. A technique for measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932; 140: 55.

  22. Nihal A, Rose DJ, Trepman E. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior ankle impingement syndrome in dancers. Foot & Ankle Int. 2005; 26(11): 908-12.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

IV




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Table 1
Table 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2020 Nov-Dic;34