medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Interna de México

Colegio de Medicina Interna de México.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Med Int Mex 2021; 37 (2)

Video consultations: scopes and limitations

Hamui-Sutton L, Halabe-Cherem J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 261-266
PDF size: 305.83 Kb.


Key words:

Telemedicine, videoconferencing consultations, Video consultations, Patient-physician relationship.

ABSTRACT

Telemedicine and videoconferencing consultations tend to be more common in the context of the current pandemic. This paper presents reflections on how the patientphysician relationship is affected when technological mediation exists and how communication and responsibility are modified, for example in the data collection of biomedical information necessary for diagnosis and treatment in the face of the impossibility of physical examination. The text also refers to the computer programs available with advanced technologies that allow the organization of private consultation in virtual mode. Innovative organizational strategies tend to expand also in remote medical services within the framework of primary health care to promote prevention and achieve greater social justice in health. A relevant issue with regard to video consultation concerns to medical education. The need to develop competencies and skills in clinical practice is an unavoidable aspect prior to the exercise of video consultation; health professionals require experiences, knowledge, skills and abilities to discern when a consultation can be purely virtual and when face-to-face meeting is necessary. In conclusion, this paper briefly addresses some of the scopes and limitations of this virtual modality of health care.


REFERENCES

  1. Miller EA. Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: a theoretical framework for evaluation. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8 (6): 311-8. doi. 10.1258/135763302320939185.

  2. Armfield NR, Bradford M, Bradford NK. The clinical use of Skype--For which patients, with which problems and in which settings? A snapshot review of the literature. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (10): 737-42. doi. 10.1016/j. ijmedinf.2015.06.006.

  3. Kahn JM. Virtual visits--confronting the challenges of telemedicine. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (18): 1684-5. doi. 10.1056/NEJMp1500533.

  4. Prieto-Egido I, Simó-Reigadas J, Liñán-Benítez L, García- Giganto V, et al. Telemedicine networks of EHAS Foundation in Latin America. Front Public Health 2014; 2:188. doi. 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00188.

  5. Allen DT, Caldwell P, Komesaroff PA, Loh PK, et al. Practical aspects of telehealth. Intern Med J 2013; 43: 1133-1136. doi. 10.1111/imj.12264.

  6. Hamui L. Construyendo caminos hacia la educación basada en competencias: Modelo educativo para desarrollar actividades profesionales confiables. En: Modelo Educativo para Desarrollar Actividades Profesionales Confiables. Manual Moderno, UNAM 2020: 1-20.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Int Mex. 2021;37