medigraphic.com
ISSN 2174-0798 (Print)
Organo oficial de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Odontopediatría (ALOP)

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odotopediatr Latinoam 2013; 3 (1)

Assessment of anxiety and heart rate: randomized clinical trial of chemo-mechanical removal of caries with PapacárieDuotm. pilot study

Lopes-Craveiro E, Jansiski-Motta L, Almeida-Alfaya T, Haddad-Leal de-Godoy C, Hermida-Bruno L, Kalil-Bussadori S

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 32-40
PDF size: 270.21 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the degree of anxiety and heart rate in pediatric patients submitted to chemomechanical caries removal with Papacárie DuoTM compared to the use of the traditional method (bur and drill). Methods: A randomized clinical trial was carried out involving seven pediatric patients. Two deciduous molars were treated in each child. The teeth were randomly allocated to one of two groups: G1 (chemomechanical caries removal using Papacárie DuoTM and G2 (removal of carious dentin using a bur and low- speed drill). The restorative procedure (glass ionomer cement) and follow up were similar in both groups. The time required for the procedure, degree of anxiety and heart rate were determined. The data were analyzed using the SPSS Program for Windows. The Wilcoxon Test was used for the comparison to the VPT results. The paired t-test was used for the comparison of heart rate and the unpaired t-test was used for the time required for treatment. Level of significance was set at 5% (p ‹ 0.05). Results: Mean time required for the procedure and heart rate at the end of the procedure were lower in G1 (p‹0.001 and p=0.042, respectively). No significant differences between groups were found regarding emotional reactions before (p=0.317), during (p=0.355) or after (p=0.564) the procedures. Conclusion: Operating time and heart rate were lower among the children treated with Papacarie DuoTM in comparison to those submitted to conventional caries removal. These findings demonstrate the advantages of conservative treatment for deciduous teeth.


REFERENCES

  1. WHO. World Health Organization. What is the burden of oral disease? Disponible in http://www.who.int/oral_ health/disease_burden/global/en/. Acessed 07/03/2012.

  2. Teixeira KIR, Bueno AC, Cortés ME. Processos Físico-Químicos no Biofilme Dentário Relacionados à Produção da Cárie. Química nova na escola. 2010;32(3).

  3. Arnold WH, Gaengler P. Light- and electronmicroscopic study of infiltration of resin into initial caries lesions--a new methodological approach. J Microsc. 2012;245(1):26-33.

  4. Tveit AB, Espelid I, Skodje F. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway. Int Dent J. 1999;49(3):165- 72.

  5. Bergius M, Berggren U, Bogdanov O, Hakeberg M. Dental anxiety among adolescents in St. Petersburg, Russia. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105(2):117-22.

  6. Lourenco-Matharu L, Ashley PF, Furness S. Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD003877.

  7. Balciuniene I, Sabalaite R, Juskiene I. Chemomechanical caries removal for children. Stomatologija. 2005;7(2):40-4.

  8. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvao AC. Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;30(2):115-9.

  9. Correa FN, Rocha Rde O, Rodrigues Filho LE, Muench A, Rodrigues CR. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;31(3):187-92.

  10. Lopez N, Simpser-Rafalin S, Berthold P. Atraumatic restorative treatment for prevention and treatment of caries in an underserved community. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(8):1338-9.

  11. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(3):233-40.

  12. Mathre S, Kumar S, Sinha S, Ahmed BMN, Thanawala EA. Chemo-Mechanical Method Of Caries Removal: A Brief Review. IJCDS. 2011;2(2):52-7.

  13. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Bachiega JC, Santis TO, Motta LJ. Clinical and radiographic study of chemical-mechanical removal of caries using Papacarie: 24-month follow up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(3):251-4.

  14. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Hermida Bruno ML, Ram D. Chemo-mechanical removal of caries in an adolescent patient using a papain gel: case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(3):177-80.

  15. Piva E, Ogliari FA, Moraes RR, Cora F, Henn S, Correr-Sobrinho L. Papain-based gel for biochemical caries removal: influence on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22(4):364-70.

  16. Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009;34(2):117-23.

  17. Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE. Atraumatic perspectives of ART: psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with and without rotary instruments. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(1):15-20.

  18. Whaley L, Wong DLN. Nursing care of infants and children. 3 ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1987.

  19. Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988;14(1):9-17.

  20. Jawa D, Singh S, Somani R, Jaidka S, Sirkar K, Jaidka R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28(2):73-7.

  21. Carrillo CM, Tanaka MH, Cesar MF, Camargo MAF, Juliano Y, Novo NF. Use of Papain Gel in Disabled Patients. JDC. 2008;75(3):222-8.

  22. Aguilar AAA, Caro TER, Saavedra JH, França CM, Fernandes KPS, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, et al. La práctica restaurativa atraumática: una alternativa dental bien recibida por los niños. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;31(2):150-2.

  23. Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res. 2001;35(5):384-9.

  24. Van Bochove JA, van Amerongen WE. The influence of restorative treatment approaches and the use of local analgesia, on the children’s discomfort. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7(1):11-6.

  25. Guinot Jimeno F, Yuste Bielsa S, Cuadros Ferna Ndez C, Lorente Rodriguez AI, Mercade Bellido M. Objective and subjective measures for assessing anxiety in paediatric dental patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2011;12(4):239-44.

  26. Raadal M, Strand GV, Amarante EC, Kvale G. Relationship between caries prevalence at 5 years of age and dental anxiety at 10. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3(1):22-6.

  27. Ferracioli L. Aprendizagem, desenvolvimento e conhecimento na obra de Jean Piaget: uma análise do processo de ensino-aprendizagem em Ciências. R bras Est pedag. 1999;80(194):5-18.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com