medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica

ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 1

<< Back

Simulación Clínica 2021; 3 (1)

Simulation-based education: debating theoretical bases of teacher education

Ferrero F, Díaz-Guio DA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/99867

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/99867
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/99867

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 35-39
PDF size: 183.10 Kb.


Key words:

Simulation, education, didactics, teacher training.

ABSTRACT

Teaching through clinical simulation requires specific teacher training. The theories commonly used in our region compose a narrow epistemological framework that should be reviewed with a critical eye. In this article we reflect on the theoretical models of Kolb, Lewin, Knowles and Miller. We present some promising concepts for their incorporation in the debate of teacher training, with the aim of contributing to the consolidation of a Latin American identity in the clinical simulation field.


REFERENCES

  1. De Sousa Santos B. Descolonizar el Saber, Reinventar el Poder. Conversations in postcolonial thought. Montevideo: Trilce; 2010.

  2. Nestel D, Bearman M. Theory and simulation-based education: definitions, worldviews and applications. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015; 11 (8): 349-354. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.013.

  3. Becerra G, Castorina A. Acerca de la noción de "marco epistémico" del constructivismo. Una comparación con la noción de "paradigma" de Kuhn. Rev Iberoam Ciencia, Tecnol y Soc. 2016; 11 (31): 9-28.

  4. Chan TM, Gottlieb M, Sherbino J, Boysen-Osborn M, Papanagnou D, Yarris LM. Education theory made practical. Vol. 1. San Francisco: Academic Life in Emergency Medicine; 2017.

  5. Dewey J. How we think. Endymion press; 2016. p. 224.

  6. Kolb DA, Boyatzis RE, Mainemelis C. Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. Perspect Think Learn Cogn Styles. 2000; 1 (216): 227-247.

  7. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/assessment/competence. Acad Med. 1990; 65 (9): S63-67.

  8. Knowles MS. The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. Education for adults and other essays. New York: Cambridge; 1980.

  9. Lewin K. Group decision and social change. In: Newcomb, TM; Hartley E, editor. Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt; 1947. p. 330-347.

  10. Ahmed RA, Frey J, Gardner AK, Gordon JA, Yudkowsky R, Tekian A. Characteristics and core curricular elements of medical simulation fellowships in North America. J Grad Med Educ. 2016; 8 (2): 252-255.

  11. Meguerdichian M, Bajaj K, Wong N, Bentley S, Walker K, Cheng A, et al. Simulation fellowships: survey of current summative assessment practices. Simul Healthc. 2019; 14 (5): 300-306.

  12. Secheresse T, Pansu P, Lima L. The impact of full-scale simulation training based on Kolb's learning cycle on medical prehospital emergency teams: a multilevel assessment study. Simul Healthc. 2020; 15 (5): 335-340.

  13. Miettinen R. The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action. Int J Lifelong Educ. 2000; 19 (1): 54-72.

  14. Seaman J. Experience, reflect, critique: the end of the "Learning Cycles" era. Journal of Experiential Education. 2008; 31.

  15. Kritsonis A. Comparison of change theories. Int J Manag Business, Adm. 2005; 8 (1): 1-7.

  16. Prochaska JO, Di Clemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy. 1982; 19 (3): 276-288.

  17. Vosniadou S. Conceptual change and education. Hum Dev. 2007; 50 (1): 47-54.

  18. Díaz-Guio DA, Ruiz-Ortega FJ. Relationship among mental models, theories of change, and metacognition : structured clinical simulation. Colomb J Anesthesiol. 2019; 47 (14): 113-116. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000107.

  19. Quintar E. Didáctica no parametral: sendero hacia la descolonización. México: IPECAL; 2008.

  20. Anijovich R, Mora S. Estrategias de enseñanza: otra mirada al quehacer en el aula. Aique; 2009, p. 128.

  21. Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc. 2007; 2 (3): 183-193.

  22. Alliaud A. La experiencia escolar de maestros inexpertos. Biografías, trayectorias y práctica profesional. Rev Iberoam Educ. 2004; 34 (1): 1-11.

  23. Terhard E. Formas del saber pedagógico y acción educativa o ¿qué es lo que forma en la formación del profesorado? Rev Educ. 1987; (284): 133-157.

  24. Brousseau G. Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997.

  25. Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. Am Psychol. 1979; 34 (10): 906-911.

  26. Peña-Ayala A. Metacognition: fundaments, applications, and trends. Springer. 2015, p. 362.

  27. Schon D. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Pennsylvania: Paperback; 1984, p. 374.

  28. Perrenoud P. Desarrollar la práctica reflexiva en el oficio de enseñar. México D.F: Graó/Colofón; 2007, p. 224.

  29. Díaz-Guio D, Cimadevilla-Calvo B. Educación basada en simulación: debriefing, sus fundamentos, bondades y dificultades. Simulación Clínica. 2019; 1 (2): 95-103.

  30. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr. 1994; 4 (4): 295-312.

  31. Fraser KL, Ayres P, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory for the design of medical simulations. Simul Healthc. 2015; 10 (5): 295-307.




Table 1

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Simulación Clínica. 2021;3