medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2020; 42 (3)

Risk factors associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in a Major Outpatient Surgery Unit over a five-year period

López-Espinosa, Guillermo1; Paipilla-Monroy, Omar Alberto1; López-Gómez, Samantha Lucia2; González-Ramírez, Raúl Sergio3
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/99958

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/99958
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/99958

Language: English/Spanish [Versi?n en espa?ol]
References: 22
Page: 191-196
PDF size: 195.28 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, conversion, risk factors.

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the management of calculous cholecystitis, so knowing the risk factors for conversion to open surgery could prepare us for the surgical intervention strategy in a major ambulatory surgery unit. Objective: To determine the main risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Material and methods: Retrospective observational study in 675 patients who underwent surgery; the causes of conversion and characteristics of the patients who required conversion were evaluated; descriptive statistics and statistical analysis using χ2 and Fisher's test were used. In addition, a logistic regression model for the probability of conversion to open surgery was performed. Results: Risk factors for conversion corresponded to men in 20.8%, p < 0.05; thickened gallbladder wall in 18.3%, p < 0.01; bilirubin level in 52.2%, p < 0.001; dilated common bile duct in 37.0%, p < 0.01. The first logistic regression model showed men with 1.9 with p < 0.05, and in the second model gallbladder wall thickness showed 3.228 and common bile duct size 3.199, both with p < 0.001. Conclusions: Statistically significant findings for surgical conversion were seen for male gender, thickened gallbladder wall, choledochal dilatation and elevated bilirubin levels. Age, duration of the clinical picture, history of abdominal surgery, obesity, and leukocytosis did not show statistical significance. The conversion rate was 2.6% in the five-year period, like that reported in other studies.



INTRODUCTION

Cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, and the laparoscopic approach has become the gold standard for the management of calculous cholecystitis.1 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantages for the patient, so identifying preoperative factors can predict the difficulty of the procedure and will allow discussion of the likelihood of conversion or evaluation of the management strategy in high-risk patients during outpatient management.2

The factors noted by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) to perform a cholecystectomy procedure include: acute cholecystitis, gallbladder wall thickening, advanced age, male gender, obesity, hemorrhage, bile duct injury, and choledocholithiasis.3,4 Other studies have included also previous abdominal surgeries, elevated total leukocyte count, Hartmann's pouch stone impaction, pericholecystic collection, stone size and number, anatomy abnormalities, liver fibrosis, and liver function test abnormalities.5,6 The decision to convert to an open procedure is based on an intraoperative analysis, noting the clarity of the anatomy, surgeon skills and the comfort to continue with the procedure; all of these with a level II grade A evidence according to SAGES Guidelines 2010.2,4

From 2 to 15% of patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy require conversion to open surgery, thus changing the course of the patient's evolution. Within the risk factors for conversion, male gender is considered a main factor. One explanation why male gender is a risk factor is that men usually take longer to seek medical attention presenting therefore with greater alteration of their condition when undergoing surgery.2,5,7,8

In 2005 at the ABC Medical Center in Mexico City, 1,843 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. They had a conversion rate of 2.7% of which 12 cases were due to intraoperative bleeding (> 600 cm3), and in the remaining 39 cases the main cause of conversion was the presence of surgical adhesions and the impossibility to identify the anatomical structures. The second cause was technical difficulty (inability to explore the biliary tract laparoscopically). The only significant variable was advanced age.9 In 2016, in a review article, an analysis was made on the factors that influence the intervention of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy; the authors analyzed 25 years since its implementation. The preoperative predictive factors they found were: age older than 65 years predicted a higher probability of failure; increases surgical time due to intraoperative complications; acute cholecystitis presenting with thickened wall on ultrasound which increased three times the number of postsurgical hospitalizations; and a history of biliary pathology complicated by choledocholithiasis, which required another type of intervention such as an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.10 In 2016, Roman Kidwai published that patients older than 50 years had a 50% conversion rate compared to those younger than 50 years.11

Conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery does not necessarily means a failure of the surgeon, but a success when facing technical difficulties in the visualization of anatomical structures or the need to control bleeding.12

Therefore, the general objective was to determine the main risk factors in our unit for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy performed over a five-year period. In addition, by knowing the preoperative risk factors for conversion in those requiring cholecystectomy may help us to better identify those high-risk patients and propose management strategies to be offered.



MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational and descriptive study conducted in a major ambulatory surgery unit (UNEME) over a five-year period, from January 2013 to December 2017. All patients were electively scheduled for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Those with complete medical records, complete laboratory tests, ultrasound scans, and post-surgical note were included. After exclusion of records, the analysis was performed in 675 patients out of a total of 3,317 operated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The variables evaluated were age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, history of abdominal surgery, time of evolution, ultrasonographic parameters, preoperative laboratory results, causes of conversion, diagnosis of conversion, and year of surgery.

For analysis, descriptive statistics were performed for frequencies and averages. χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used for cross-tabulations of risk factors associated with conversion to open surgery. Logistic regression models were estimated for the probability of conversion to open surgery. The SPSS Statistics software program 24 was used to perform the statistical analysis.



RESULTS

Of the 675 patients 85.8% were women and 14.2% men; 83.4% were younger than 55 years and 16.6% older than 55 years; 9.8% had diabetes, 53.5% a history of abdominal surgery, 43.4% obesity and 55.8% a clinical picture of at least six months. Among the ultrasound parameters, 66.3% had normal gallbladder wall thickness and 33.7% had a thickened wall (> 3 mm was considered as thickening of the gallbladder wall); 94% had a dilated common bile duct (> 6 mm were used as the measure to consider a dilated common bile duct by ultrasound); 98.1% had the presence of gallstones on ultrasound. Among laboratory parameters, 96% had normal bilirubin levels and 4.0% had elevated bilirubin levels; white blood cell counts were normal in 89.2% and elevated in 10.8%.

The conversion rate per year remained constant over the study period and corresponded to 2.6% from January 2013 through December 2017. There was a small increase in the conversion rate in 2014 to 3.7%. This 2.6% conversion rate falls within the global parameters of conversion to open surgery.1,2

The variables studied with respect to the converted patients were analyzed by means of cross tables. The results are shown in Figure 1.

Surgery conversion was required in 20.8% of men and 11.7% of women (p < 0.05). Of these, 8.0% had normal vesicular wall on ultrasound and 18.3% had thickened wall with a p < 0.001). Regarding bilirubin levels 10.7% had normal levels and in 52.2% these levels were elevated with a p < 0.001)9; 37% had common bile duct dilatation while 3% did not show it (p < 0.01). Of the total of patients 11.6% had a history of abdominal surgery, 17% were older than 55 years, 13.6% had a history of diabetes, 16.7% show increased white blood cell counts, 14% had a clinical picture lasting between one and two years, and 14.9% had obesity (Tables 1, 2 and 3).

Two logistic regression models to assess the probability of conversion to open surgery were performed. In the first model, demographic variables were used, and male gender showed a 1.9 higher probability (p < 0.05) of converting from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. The second model added ultrasound variables of wall thickness which gave a 3.228 higher conversion rate probability and a common bile duct dilatation that showed a 3.199 higher conversion rate probability (both p < 0.001) (Table 4).



DISCUSSION

The risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy have been shown to be the same as those seen for a difficult cholecystectomy. Therefore, it is very important to have complete patient data, medical history, and laboratory studies including an ultrasound scan of gallbladder and bile ducts

One of the limitations of our study was that ultrasound scans did not have a standardized way of measurement. Whether they are performed in public or private facilities all of them provided information with non-constant parameters (all the ultrasounds used in our study were not performed in the unit). So, it is very important to know well the data of the gallbladder wall. Preoperative ultrasound has been used as a method to indicate technical difficulties and predict potential conversion.13,14

In our study, significant gallbladder wall thickness above 3 mm was used as a cut-off value, since it is a radiological sign of acute cholecystitis with inflammatory changes.4,15 The range of the common bile duct diameter is from 4-8 mm,10,13 and the size of a dilated common bile duct above 6 mm has been reported as a cause for a difficult cholecystectomy.16 On the other hand, no significance was seen in the number of stones and the risk of conversion.1,2 With the above mentioned, it is observed that these are data of an acute picture that include tissue inflammation and induration, which difficult the dissection of Calot's triangle due to the inflammatory process7,8 and the other part is the predictive factors of choledocholithiasis adding another issue to the initial picture.17

Our conversion results are very much alike those found in other series worldwide. The conversion parameters used for our analysis were: male gender (since there has been a higher incidence of conversion to open surgery than in women); gallbladder wall thickness > 3 mm; common bile duct dilatation > 6 mm; and the presence or absence of gallstones by ultrasound. And other factors were increased bilirubin levels > 1.5 mg/dl; leukocytosis > 11,000 mm/dl; history of abdominal surgery; age over 55 years; diabetes; increased body mass index; and clinical symptoms lasting over six months.18-20

Regarding the reasons for conversion, the most prevalent were the following: surgical adhesions, bile duct dilatation and difficulty in obtaining a satisfactory Strasberg's critical view. The results obtained were alike to those of other studies in which difficulty in dissecting Calot's triangle and intraoperative hemorrhage were main reasons since it obscures the operative field impeding the identification of the anatomical safety points.1,5,21 The explanation for the incidence of these factors could be that a prolonged course of symptoms leads to a more severe and progressive inflammatory process, which impedes successful completion of laparoscopic surgery.22

We observed that these factors increase the risk of conversion since they lead to other difficulties and issues during the operative act. Therefore, with the continuous evaluation of the efficacy of these diagnostic instruments to identify risk factors, as well as assessing the increased difficulty these factors impose to the surgery, they will help us to continue studying the management options available and in necessary cases to plan the patient's management strategy.



CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study will support the assessment of patients before undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy by considering which patients are at risk of being converted from a laparoscopic procedure to an open one thus leading to longer hospitalization time and the use of more health resources for the patient and the hospital units.


REFERENCES

  1. Overby W, Apelgren KN. SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 2368-286.

  2. Kassa V, Jaiswal R. Assessment of risk factors for difficult surgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. IMJ. 2017; 4: 258-262.

  3. Shiun Yew Hu A, Menon R, Gunnarsson R, De Costa A. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery a systematic literature review of 30 studies. Am J Surg. 2017; 214: 920-930.

  4. Tosun A, Oymen HK, Serifoglu I, Capan Y, Ozkaya E. Role of preoperative sonography in predicting conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84: 346-349.

  5. Ostos LJ, Perez E. Tratado de cirugía general. AMCG. 2017; 1: 1343-1350.

  6. Galloso GL, Frías RA. Factores que influyen en la conversión de la colecistectomía video laparoscópica a cirugía tradicional. Rev Cubana Med Mil. 2012; 41: 352-360.

  7. Hunter JG. Acute cholecystitis revisited. Ann Surg. 1998; 227: 468-469.

  8. Cicero LA, Valdés FJ, Decanini MA, Golffier RC, Cicero LC, Cervantes CJ, Rojas RG. Factores que predicen la conversión de la colecistectomía laparoscópica: Cinco años de experiencia en el Centro Médico ABC. Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2005; 6: 66-73.

  9. Rothman JP, Burcharth J. Preoperative risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery- A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Dig Surg. 2016; 33: 414-423.

  10. Rashid T, Naheed A. Conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy into open cholecystectomy: an experience in 300 cases. Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016; 28: 116-119.

  11. Ocádiz J, Salvador J. Conversión de la colecistectomía laparoscópica, más allá de la curva de aprendizaje. Acta Med. 2011; 9: 192-195.

  12. Kama NA, Kologlu M. A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2001; 181: 520-523.

  13. Kania D. Ultrasound measurement of the Gallbladder wall thickness in the assessment of the risk of conversion from elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery- Olkusz county experience. Pol Przegl Chir. 2016; 88: 334-345.

  14. Pinto A, Reginelli A, Cagini L, Coppolino F, Stabile IA, Bracale R, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute calculous cholecystitis: review of the literature. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013; 5: S11.

  15. Abdulhussein B, Hussein Y, Nawar A, Al-Naggar R. Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery at Al Karamah Teaching Hospital, Iraq. Surgical Science. 2015; 6: 221-226.

  16. Pawan L, Agarwal PN. A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy that requires conversion to open procedure can be predicted by preoperative ultrasonography. JSLS. 2002; 6: 59-63.

  17. Maple JT. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. SAGES. 2010; 71: 1-9.

  18. Fernandes U, Bertozzi M. Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and cost-effective: a Brazilian single center experience. Arq Gastroenterol. 2016; 53: 103-107.

  19. Bueno J, Granero P. Twenty-five years of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cir Esp. 2016; 94: 429-441.

  20. Juarez D, Escamilla A. Género masculino factor de riesgo para la colecistectomía. Cir Gen. 2006; 28: 93-96.

  21. Strasberg SM, Brunt M. Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211: 132-138.

  22. Prieto-Díaz-Chávez E, Medina-Chavez JL. Factores de riesgo para conversión de colecistectomía laparoscópica a colecistectomía abierta. Cir Gen. 2010; 32: 34-38.



AFFILIATIONS

1 General Surgeon, General Hospital ISESALUD and UNEME Tijuana, Mexico.

2 Medical Intern in social service.

3 Researcher at the Colegio de la Frontera Norte.



Ethical considerations and responsibility: Data privacy. In accordance with the protocols established at the authors\' work center, the authors declare that they have followed the protocols on patient data privacy while preserving their anonymity.

Funding: No financial support was received for this study.

Disclosure: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.



CORRESPONDENCE

Guillermo López-Espinosa. E-mail: glopezcirugia@gmail.com




Received: 01/15/2019. Accepted: 05/27/2019

Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2020;42