Medicina Crítica

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board

>Journals >Medicina Crítica >Year 2006, Issue 1

Rodríguez-Pimentel L, Garduño-Espinoza J, Estrada PN, Silva RR
Clinical agreement in the evaluation of illness severity of patients in emergency room
Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int 2006; 20 (1)

Language: Español
References: 36
Page: 16-24
PDF: 113.69 Kb.

Full text


Objective: To determine the efficacy of physicians to evaluate the degree of illness severity of patients admitted to an emergency room.
Design: Transversal and comparative study.
Setting: Emergency Room of a tertiary care hospital, Mexico City.
Method: Two internist physicians qualified independently and blindly the severity of illness of twenty patients admitted to an emergency room. Six scales were used: three subjective scales (Clinical Evaluation Scale which qualified the patients as mild, seriously and very seriously ill; Physical Status Classification of the Anaesthesiologist American Society [ASA]; and Visual Analogue Scale; and three objective scales (Simplified Acute Physiology Score [SAPS II]; Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System [TISS] and Charlson Comorbidity Index).
Results: Clinical Classification Scale had an agreement of Kappa coefficient = 0.22 and ASA classification = 0.25 (p ‹ 0.02), the agreement of Visual Analogue Scale determined through Ri was 0.59, TISS 0.60 (IC 95% [0.01 to 0.84]), Charlson Comorbidity 0.86 (IC 95% [0.71 to 0.95]) and SAPS II Score 0.96 (IC 95% [0.84 to 0.98]).
Conclusion: The use of objective scales of illness severity is more appropriate to evaluate the patients admitted to an emergency room.

Key words: Severity, agreement, Visual Analogue Scale, ASA, SAPS II, TISS, comorbidity.


  1. Pompei P, Charlson ME, Douglas G. Clinical assessments as predictors of one year survival after hospitalization: implications for prognostic stratification. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:275-84.

  2. Fajardo-Gutiérrez A, Yamamoto-Kimura LT, Garduño-Espinoza J, Hernández-Hernández DM, Martínez García MC. Consistencia y validez de una medición en la investigación clínica pediátrica. Definición, evaluación y su interpretación. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 1991;48: 367-81.

  3. Merino CE. Observaciones y mediciones. En: Moreno Altamirano, Cano Valle, García Romero, editores. Epidemiología clínica. 2ª ed. México: Nueva Editorial Interamericana, 1994:69-97.

  4. Latour J, Abraira V, Cabello JB, López JS. Las mediciones clínicas en cardiología: validez y errores de medición. Rev Esp Cardiol 1997;50:117-128.

  5. Knaus WA, Wagner D, Lynn J. Short-term mortality predictions for critically ill hospitalized adults: science and ethics. Science 1991;254:389-94.

  6. Burnum JF. Medical diagnosis through semiotics. Giving meaning to the sign. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:939-43.

  7. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 1941;2:281-84.

  8. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL. ASA physical status classifications: A study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239-43.

  9. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Spitz JA, Gehlbach SH, Rapaport J. Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 1993;270:2478-86.

  10. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818-29.

  11. Knaus WA, Wagner DO, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991;100:1619-36.

  12. Bone CR, Lemeshow S, Sauler F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American Multicenter Study. JAMA 1993;270:2957-63.

  13. Keene AR, Cullen DJ. Therapeutic intervention scoring system. Update 1983. Critical Care Medicine 1983;11:1-3.

  14. Miskulin DC, Athienites NV, Yan G, Martin AA, Ornt DB et al. Comorbidity assessment using the Index of Coexistent Diseases in a multicenter clinical trial. Kidney International 2001;60:1498-1510.

  15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie R. A new method of classifying prognostic co morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987;40:373-83.

  16. Fleiss JL. Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait. Biometrics 1975;31: 651-659.

  17. Uebersax J. Statistical methods for rater agreement. Disponible en: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax/agree.htm (consultado en junio 2002).

  18. Thompson WD, Walter SD. A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:949-958.

  19. Feinstein A, Cicchetti D. High agreement but low kappa: 1. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543-549.

  20. Maclure M, Willett WC. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistics. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:161-169.

  21. Brenner H, Kliebsch U. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology 1996;7:199-202.

  22. Drasgow F. Polychoric and polyserial correlations. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL, editors. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986:68-74.

  23. Models for matched pairs. In: Agresti A, editor. An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley, 1996:226-256.

  24. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428.

  25. Nichols DP. Choosing an intraclass correlation coefficient. SPSS Keywords, No. 67, 1998.

  26. Yaffe RA. Enhancement of reliability analysis: application of intraclass correlations with SPSS/Windows v.8.

  27. Intraclasss correlation coefficient. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL, editors. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986:212-216.

  28. Bland M, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.

  29. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statist Med 1998;17:101-110.

  30. Downie N, Heath R. Métodos estadísticos aplicados. 5th ed. México:. Harla, 1986:95.

  31. Holt AW. Prospective evaluation of residents and nurses as severity score data collectors. Crit Care Med 1992; 20:1688-91.

  32. Prasad K. The Glasgow coma scale: a critical appraisal of its clinimetrics properties. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:755-763.

  33. Soulen JL, Duggan AK, DeAngelis CD. Identification of potentially avoidable pediatric hospital use: admitting physician judgment as a complement to utilization review. Pediatrics 1991;94:421-424.

  34. Oye RK. A simple method for rating illness severity at admission and expected functional status at discharge: how should we use the information? Am J Med 2000;109: 250-251.

  35. Horn SD, Sharkey PD, Bucle JM, Backofen JE, Averill RF, Horn RA. The relationship between severity of illness and hospital length of stay and mortality. Med Care 1991;29:305-17.

  36. Sacket DL. Clinical disagreement: I. How often it occurs and why. CMAJ 1980;123:499-01.

>Journals >Medicina Crítica >Year 2006, Issue 1

· Journal Index 
· Links 

Copyright 2019