Entrar/Registro  
HOME SPANISH
 
Revista de la Facultad de Medicina UNAM
   
MENU

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board






>Journals >Revista de la Facultad de Medicina UNAM >Year 2017, Issue 3


D´Hyver DC
Integral geriatric assessment
Rev Fac Med UNAM 2017; 60 (3)

Language: Español
References: 20
Page: 38-54
PDF: 598.37 Kb.


Full text




ABSTRACT

The comprehensive geriatric assessment is an instrument that allows the integration of knowledge in the clinical, psychological, mental and social spheres within the clinical evaluation of the older adult patient, allowing a broad and clear view of the context of the patient’s situation, It facilitates not only the diagnosis of the usual pathological entities but it also integrates the geriatric syndromes, facilitating the distribution of tasks in a multidisciplinary team. It provides a clear vision of the objectives involved in the management intended in giving them a higher quality of life. We present the most utilized tests that help achieve the assessment of the older adult.


Key words: Valuation, geriatric, elderly.


REFERENCIAS

  1. González KD. Envejecimiento demográfico en México: análisis comparativo entre entidades federativas. La situación demográfica de México 2015. CONAPO [Consultado: 10 feb 2016]. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/ uploads/attachment/file/88784/06_Envejecimiento_demografico_ en_Mexico.pdf]

  2. Valoración geriátrica integral en unidades de atención médica. Evidencias y recomendaciones. Catálogo Maestro de guías de práctica clínica: IMSS 190-10. CENETEC 2010. Disponible en: www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/interior/ gpc.html

  3. Fontecha Gómez BJ. Valoración geriátrica: visión desde el hospital de día. Rev Mult Gerontol. 2005;15(1):23-5.

  4. Ariño S, Benavent R. La valoración geriátrica integral, una herramienta fundamental para el diagnóstico y el tratamiento. JANO Elsevier Newslwtter. 2002;62(1435):41-3. Disponible en: www.jano.es

  5. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al. Studies of illness in the age: The index of ADL, a standarized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914-9.

  6. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: selfmaintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179-86.

  7. Guralnik J, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association Whit Self –Reported Disability and Prediction of Mortality and Nursing Home admition. Journal of Gerontology Medical Sciences. 1994;49(2):M85-M94.

  8. Tinetti M. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986; 34:119-28.

  9. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. “Mini Nutritional Assessment”: A practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Facts and Research in Gerontology. 1994;S2:15-59

  10. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189- 98.

  11. Martinez de la Iglesia J, Onís Vilches MC, Dueñas Herrero R, Aguado Taberna C, Albert Colomer C, Luque Luque R. Versión española del cuestionario de Yesevage abreviado (GDS) para el cribado de depresión en mayores de 65 años: Adaptación y validación. Medifam. 2002;12:620-30.

  12. Yesavage J, Brink TL. Development and validation of a Geriatric Depression Screening Scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1983;17:37-49.

  13. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980;20:649-55.

  14. Barel M. A new tool for rapid geriatric assessment in the elderly. Isr Med Assoc J. 2012:14(11):672-5.

  15. Buurman BM, Parlevliet JL, Allore HG, Blok W, van Deelen BA, Moll van Charante EP, et al. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Transitional Care in Acutely Hospitalized Patients: The Transitional Care Bridge Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(3); 302-9.

  16. Abete P, Cherubini A, Di Bari M, Vigorito C, Viviani G, Marchionni N, et al. Does comprehensive geriatric assessment improve the estimate of surgical risk in elderly patients? An Italian multicenter observational study. Am J Surg. 2016;211(1);76-83.e2.

  17. Corre R, Greillier L, Le Caër H, Audigier-Valette C, Baize N, Bérard H, et al. Use of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for the Management of Elderly Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III Valoración geriátrica integral Randomized ESOGIA-GFPC-GECP 08-02 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(13);1476-83.

  18. VanderWalde NA, Deal AM, Comitz E, Stravers L, Muss H, Reeve B, et al. Comprenhensive Geriatric Assessment as predictor of tolerance, quality of lyf, and toxicity il older patients receiving radiation. International Journal of radiation oncology, Biology, Physics. 2016;15(4):885.

  19. Álvarez-Fernández B, Formiga F, de la Mora-Martín M, Calleja F, Gómez-Huelgas R. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017:69(4);01-31.

  20. Pilotto A, Cella A, Pilotto A, Daragjati J, Veronese N, Musacchio C, et al. Three decades of comprehensive geriatric assessment: evidence coming from different healthcare settings and apecific clinical conditions. JAMDA. 2017:18(2);192. e1-192.e11.






>Journals >Revista de la Facultad de Medicina UNAM >Year 2017, Issue 3
 

· Journal Index 
· Links 






       
Copyright 2019