Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board

>Journals >MediSan >Year 2013, Issue 12

Orozco GMI, Palú OA, Plasencia AC, Romero GLI
The ABC in reviewing a thesis
MediSan 2013; 17 (12)

Language: Español
References: 4
Page: 9180-9192
PDF: 419.00 Kb.

[Full text - PDF]


The purpose of this scientific article is to promote updated methodological elements related to one of the most important processes in the postgraduate activity: evaluation of the thesis, in which health professionals are increasingly involved; process is not well implemented by all in the methodological and educational aspect. The proposed guidance could be an important tool with existing ones, which will improve the training of evaluators and the quality in performing this important function.

Key words: postgraduate, thesis, examining board, universalization.


  1. Bavarre Vea HD, Oliva Pérez M, Horsford Saing R, Ranero Aparicio V, Coutin Marie G, Díaz Llanes G, et al. Metodología de la investigación en Atención Primaria de Salud. Libro de Texto. La Habana; Editorial Ciencias Médicas;2007.

  2. Guía para elaborar un proyecto de investigación. Arch argent pediatr. 2011 [citado 12 Ene 2012];109(4). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0325- 00752011000400023&lng=es

  3. Jiménez Arias ME. ¿Qué trato merece la redacción científica? MEDISAN. 2007[citado 12 Ene 2012];11(1). Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/san/vol11_1_07/san04107.htm

  4. Silva Ayçaguer LC. Cultura estadística e investigación científica en el campo de la salud: una mirada crítica. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos;1997.

>Journals >MediSan >Year 2013, Issue 12

· Journal Index 
· Links 

Copyright 2019