Entrar/Registro  
HOME SPANISH
 
Veterinaria México
   
MENU

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board






>Journals >Veterinaria México >Year 2012, Issue 2


Santurtún OE, Tapia PG, González-Rebeles C, Galindo MF
Consumer attitudes and perceptions towards sustainable animal production attributes in Mexico City
Vet Mex 2012; 43 (2)

Language: English/Spanish
References: 52
Page: 87-101
PDF: 223.25 Kb.


Full text




ABSTRACT

Animal production systems in pursuit of sustainability production, have to integrate several elements such as: environmental protection, food safety, animal welfare, and benefits to local producers. The objectives of the study were: 1) identify the attitudes of consumers in three districts of Mexico City towards sustainable attributes; 2) identify their perceptions regarding the production of animal food products; 3) determine if there is an effect of the social-demographic variables. In this sense, one thousand two hundred consumers were surveyed in markets of three districts of Mexico City with different social-economic levels. Results show that attitudes and perceptions of consumers differ mainly according to the district where they reside. In relation to the sustainable attributes, consumers considered food safety as the most important attribute of an animal product, followed by environmental protection. Regarding animal food production in Mexico, consumers perceived in first place that this benefits local producers, that they are safe products, that it improves animal welfare, and, finally, that it conserves the environment. These results revealed that consumers in Mexico City show positive attitudes towards sustainable animal food production attributes, which could represent new opportunities for the food industry in Mexico.


Key words: Attitudes, sustainable attributes, consumer, Mexico City, survey, animal production.


REFERENCIAS

  1. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS. The State of Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO, 2009.

  2. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS. The State of Food insecurity in the World. Rome: FAO, 2005.

  3. STEINFELD H, GERBER P, WASSENAAR T, CASTEL V, ROSALES M, DE HAAN C. Livestock´s long shadow. Environmental issues and options. Rome: FAO, 2006.

  4. WEBSTER J. Animal welfare: limping towards Eden. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005.

  5. BELK KE, SCANGA JA, GRANDIN T. Biosecurity for Animal Health and Food Safety. In: GRANDIN T, editor. Livestock Handling and Transport. Wallingford: CAB International, 2007:354-367.

  6. BROOM DM. Bienestar Animal. En: GALINDO F, ORIHUELA A, editores. Etología Aplicada. México DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2004:51-87.

  7. WORLD ORGANIZATION FOR ANIMAL HEALTH. Global conference on animal welfare: an OIE initiative. Paris: OIE, 2004.

  8. BAYVEL A. The OIE animal welfare strategic initiative, progress, priorities and prognosis. Proceedings of the Global Conference on animal welfare: an OIE initiative; 2004 February 13-17; Paris, France: World Organization for Animal Health, 2004:13-17.

  9. BROOM DM. Welfare and how is affected by regulation. In: KUNISH M, EKKEL H, editors. Regulation of Animal Production in Europe. Darmstad: K.T.B.L.,1999:51-57.

  10. BROOM DM. The use of the concept animal welfare in European conventions, regulations and directives. Proceedings Food Chain; 2001 March 14-16; Uppsala, Sweden: SLU Services, 2001:148-151.

  11. BROOM DM. Does present legislation help animal welfare? Landbauforsch Volk 2002; 227: 63-69.

  12. CHILTON S, BURGESS D, HUTCHINSON W. The relative value of farm animal welfare. Ecol Econ 2006; 29:353-363.

  13. AERTS S. Animal welfare in assurance schemes: benchmarking for progress. In: ZOLLITSCH W, WINCKLER W, WAIBLINGER C, HASLBERGER A, editors. Sustainable food production and ethics: Preprints of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics. Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007: 279-283.

  14. KORZEN-BOHR S, LASSEN J. Is it possible to make riskreduction strategies socially sustainable? In: ZOLLITSCH W, WINCKLER W, WAIBLINGER C, HASLBERGER A, editors. Sustainable food production and ethics: Preprints of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics. Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007:371-375.

  15. KJARNES U. Ethics and action: a relational perspective on food trends and consumer concerns. In: ZOLLITSCH W, WINCKLER W, WAIBLINGER C, HASLBERGER A, editors. Sustainable food production and ethics: Preprints of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics. Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007:43-48.

  16. SUNDRUM A. Conflicting areas in the ethical debate on animal health and welfare. In: ZOLLITSCH W, WINCKLER W, WAIBLINGER C, HASLBERGER A, editors. Sustainable food production and ethics: Preprints of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics. Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007:257-262.

  17. KULO M, VRAMO LM. Sheep welfare in the welfare state: ethical aspects of the conventionalization of Norwegian organic production. In: ZOLLITSCH W, WINCKLER W, WAIBLINGER C, HASLBERGER A, editors. Sustainable food production and ethics. Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007:273-278.

  18. CHALLENGER A. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México. Pasado, Presente y Futuro. México DF: CONABIO, Instituto de Biología, UNAM y Sierra Madre AC, 1998.

  19. PÉREZ ER. Notas sobre el sector pecuario en México. En: CAVALLOTTI VB, PALACIO VH, editores. La ganadería: experiencias y reflexiones. México DF: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, 2004:125-138.

  20. FRASER D. The “New Perception” of animal agriculture: Legless cows, featherless chickens, and a need for genuine analysis. J Anim Sci 2001;79:634-641.

  21. REISCH L. Principles and visions of a new consumer policy. J Consum Policy 2004;27:1-42.

  22. ENKERLIN EC, CANO G, GARZA RA, VOGEL E. Ciencia Ambiental y Desarrollo Sostenible. México D.F: International Thomson Editores,1997.

  23. SAYER JA, CAMPBELL BM. The Science of Sustainable Development. Local livelihoods and the global environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

  24. GAMBORG C, SANDOE P. Sustainability in farm animal breeding: a review. Livest Sci 2005;92:221-233.

  25. WIBERG S, ALGERS A, ALGERS B, FRANZEN U, LINDENCRONA M, MOEN O et al. Logistics at transport to slaughter: food and environment-optimized animal transport. In: ZOLLITSCH W, WINCKLER W, WAIBLINGER C, HASLBERGER A, editors. Sustainable food production and ethics. Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007:244-248.

  26. MOYNAGH J. EU regulation and consumer demand for animal welfare. AgBioForum 2000;3:107-114.

  27. TALLONTIRE A, RENTSENDORJ E, BLOWFIELD M. Ethical consumers and ethical trade: A review of current literature. Policy Series 12. Chatman: Natural Resources Institute, 2001.

  28. BROOM DM. Future food animal production efficiency and acceptability. In: SHAMSUDDIN ZH, editor. Agriculture Congress: Innovation towards Modernized Agriculture. Serdang: University Putra Malaysia, 2004:17-21.

  29. KJARNES U. Ethics and action: a relational perspective on food trends and consumer concerns. In: ZOLLITSCH W, WINCKLER W, WAIBLINGER C, HASLBERGER A, editors. Sustainable food production and ethics. Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007:43-48.

  30. CORNELISSEN A, VAN DEN BERG J, KOOPS WJ, GROSSMAN M, UDO H. Assessment of the contribution of sustainability indicators to sustainable development: a novel approach using fuzzy set theory. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2001;86:173-185.

  31. BARRAZA L, RUIZ-MALLÉN I, DÍAZ D. Percepciones urbanas sobre los Organismos Genéticamente Modificados en tres estados de México. México DF: Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, UNAM, 2007.

  32. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA Y GEOGRAFÍA. Regiones Socioeconómicas de México. [Serie en línea:2007 noviembre] [Citado: 2007/nov/10]. Disponible en: URL:http://jweb.inegi.gob.mx/niveles/jsp/index.jsp.

  33. MCGLONE JJ. Farm animal welfare in the context of other society issues: toward sustainable systems. Livest Sci 2001; 72:75-81.

  34. TE VELDE H, AARTS N, VAN WOERKUM C. Dealing with ambivalent: farmers and consumers perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. J Agr Environ Ethic 2002;15:203-219.

  35. OPPENHEIM AN. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter publishers Ltd,1992.

  36. ZAR JH. Biostatistical Analysis. New Yersey: Prentice Hall International,1999.

  37. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA Y GEOGRAFÍA. Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo 2005. Aguascalientes (México): INEGI, 2006.

  38. SCOTT D, USHER R. Researching education data, methods and theory in educational enquiry. London: Cassell, 1999.

  39. MCDONALD JH. Handbook of Biological Statistics. Baltimore: Sparky House Publishing, 2009.

  40. SPSS. Statistical algorithms. Chicago: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc.,1991.

  41. SUNDRUM A. Conflicting areas in the ethical debate on animal health and welfare. In: ZOLLITSCH W, WINCKLER W, WAIBLINGER C, HASLBERGER A, editors. Sustainable food production and ethics. Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007:257-262.

  42. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Attitudes of consumers toward the welfare of farmed animals. Special Eurobarometer 229/ Wave 63.2. Brussels, 2005.

  43. MOHAI P, BRYANT B. Is there a “race” effect on concern for environmental quality? Public Opin Quart 1998;62:475-505.

  44. BERNUES A, OLAIZOLA A, CORCORAN K. Labeling information demanded by European consumers and relationship with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Sci 2003;65:1095-1106.

  45. KNOWLES T, WARRIS P. Stress physiology of animals during transport. In: GRANDIN T, editor. Livestock Handling and Transport. Wallingford: CAB International, 2007:312-328.

  46. MCEACHERN M, SHRÖDER M. The role of livestock production ethics in consumers values toward meat. J Agr Environ Ethic 2002;15:221-237.

  47. WATSON J, WRIGHT K. Consumer ethnocentrism and attitudes toward domestic and foreign products. Eur J Marketing 2000;34:1149-1166.

  48. UYEKI ES, HOLLAND LJ. Diffusion of proenvi-ronment attitudes? Am Behav Sci 2000;43: 646-662.

  49. KELLERT S. The biological basis for human values of nature. In: KELLERT S, WILSON, EO, editors. The biophilia hypothesis. Washington: Island Press, 1993:42-69.

  50. AOYAGI-USUI M, VINKEN H, KURIBAYASHI A. Pro-environment attitudes and behaviors: an international comparison. Hum Ecol Rev 2003;10:123-31.

  51. LAPPALAINEN R, KEARNEY J, GIBNEY M. A Pan-EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health: An overview. Food Qual Prefer 1998;9:467-478.

  52. BRUNSO K, FJORD TA, GRUNERT KG. Consumers´ food choice and quality perception. MAPP working paper No. 77. Aarhus: Aarhus School of Business, 2002.






>Journals >Veterinaria México >Year 2012, Issue 2
 

· Journal Index 
· Links 






       
Copyright 2019