Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board

>Journals >Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social >Year 2007, Issue 6

Escobar-Rodríguez DÁ, Rivera-Ibarra DB, Servín-Álvarez A, Ortiz-Cázares C, Juárez-López MJ
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure the Satisfaction of Users of Rehabilitation Services
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2007; 45 (6)

Language: Español
References: 24
Page: 573-578
PDF: 141.90 Kb.

Full text


Objective: to develop and validate an instrument to measure users’ satisfaction of rehabilitation services.
Methods: literature review to identify main construct domains, elaboration of items, pilot testing to reduce the number of items and redefinition of the questionnaire. The face and content validity were established by rehabilitation specialists. The questionnaire was applied to 85 users of rehabilitation services. The analysis was performed using a principal component factor analysis followed by a varimax rotation, then, the Scree test was used to select significant components and to estimate reliability and validity of the instrument, also Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and the split-half test were ascertained.
Results: the final version of the questionnaire consisted of 24 questions. Eighty-five patients answered the questionnaire that was completed in ten minutes on average. The principal components factor analysis and the Scree test detected 8 significant components. Internal consistency of the instrument had a coefficient Cronbach’s alpha of 0.80 which was considered as acceptable, and the reliability, by means of the split-half test showed an alpha of 0.72 and 0.69 respectively.
Conclusions: The instrument to evaluate user’s satisfaction of rehabilitation services showed to be valid and reliable.

Key words: patient satisfaction, quality of health care, health care evaluation mechanisms, rehabilitation.


  1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre. How to read clinical journals: VI. To learn about the quality of clinical care. Can Med Assoc J 1984;130:377-381.

  2. Brook RH, McGlynn EA. Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med 1996;335(13):966-969.

  3. Moreno AL, Cano VF, García RH. Evaluación de la calidad de la atención médica. En: Epidemiología clínica. 2ª edición. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 1994. p. 217.

  4. Cappelleri JC, Kourides IA, Gerber RA, Gelfand RA. Development and factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with injected and inhaled insulin for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1799-1803.

  5. Hall JA, Dornan MC. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med 1988;27(9):935-939.

  6. Woolley FR, Kane RL, Hughes CC, Wright DD. The effects of doctor-patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care. Soc Sci Med 1978;12:123-128.

  7. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ. The relationship between patients’ satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Medical Care 1989;27(11):1027-1035.

  8. Hall JA, Feldstein M, Fretwell MD, Rowe JW, Epstein AM. Older patients’ health status and satisfaction with medical care in an HMO population. Medical Care 1990;28(3):261-270.

  9. Stamps PL, Finkelstein JB. Statistical analysis of an attitudes scales to measure patient satisfaction with medical care. Medical Care 1981;19(11):1108-1121.

  10. Shore BE, Franks P. Physician satisfaction with patient encounters. Medical Care 1986;24(6):580-589.

  11. Wilson KG, Crupi CD, Greene G, Gaulin-Jones Bdehoux E, Korol CT. Consumer satisfaction with a rehabilitation mobile outreach program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76(10):899-904.

  12. Roush SE, Sonstroem RJ. Development of the physical therapy outpatient satisfaction survey (PTOPS). Phys Ther 1999:79(2):159-170.

  13. Linder-Pelz S. Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: a test of five hypothesis. Soc Sci Med 1982;16:583-589.

  14. Linder-Pelz SU. Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 1982;16:577-582.

  15. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med 1994;38(4):509-516.

  16. Allen KR. Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1122-1128.

  17. Goldstein MS, Elliott SD, Guccione AA. The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy. Phys Ther 2000;80:853-863.

  18. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988;260(12):1743-1748.

  19. Paddock LE, Veloski J, Chatterton ML, Gevirtz FO, Nash DB. Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with diabetes disease management. Diabetes Care 2000; 23(7):951-956.

  20. Health Services Research Group. A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice. Can Med Assoc J 1992;146(10):1727-1731.

  21. Loeken K, Steine S, Sandvik L, Laerum E. A new instrument to measure patient satisfaction with mammography. Validity, reliability, and discriminatory power. Med Car 1997;35(7):731-741.

  22. Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patient satisfaction: IIdesigning a questionnaire and conducting a surveys. BMJ 1991;302:1129-1232.

  23. Mancuso M, Smith P, Illig S, Granger CV, Gonzalez VA, Linn RT, Ottenbacher KJ. Satisfaction eith medical rehabilitation in patients with orthopedic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1343-1349.

  24. McKinley RK, Manku-Scott T, Hastings AM, French DP, Baker R. Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the United Kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire. BMJ 1997; 314:193-198.

>Journals >Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social >Year 2007, Issue 6

· Journal Index 
· Links 

Copyright 2019