Entrar/Registro  
HOME SPANISH
 
Ginecología y Obstetricia de México
   
MENU

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board






>Journals >Ginecología y Obstetricia de México >Year 2015, Issue 01


Montoya-Romero JJ, Schiavon R, Troncoso E, Díaz-Olavarrieta C, Karver T
Induced abortion in Mexico: what do Mexican Ob/Gyn know, think and do
Ginecol Obstet Mex 2015; 83 (01)

Language: Español
References: 21
Page: 23-31
PDF: 434.86 Kb.


Full text




ABSTRACT

Background: The causals for legal abortion in Mexico vary as established by the Constitution of each State; from 2007 it is legal in Mexico City.
Objective: To identify knowledge, attitudes and practice of abortion between gynecologists and obstetricians.
Material and methods: Survey study conducted between some of the gynaeco-obstetricians attended the 64th Mexican Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics held in Mexico City, October 2013.
Results: From the 1,085 respondents, 77% correctly identified that abortion is legal accord to Constitutional Signs of each State; 17.5% said it is never legal and 5.7% thought that is always legal. The 67% comment that public institutions should have infrastructure and trained medical personnal to legal abortion practice. The 72% response they would attend or denounce the woman who underwent an abortion outlawed. The remaining 28% showed negative attitudes, from informing the couple or parents (18%), scold women (2%) or reporting it to the authorities (8%). In 39%, they felt that the medical profession who practice discriminates abortions; 28% admit stigmatize partener and 27% feel stigmatized if performing abortions. Percentage high hospitalized patients in case of early abortions, for surgical or medical treatment.
Conclusions: It is necessary to increase and improve knowledge technical and legal about abortion, especially among gynaeco-obstetricians, they are who responsibility to comply about prescribed by law, in accordance with international recommendations and the exercise of reproductive rights of women.


Key words: Health service delivery, medical abortion, surgical abortion, legal indications for abortion.


REFERENCIAS

  1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Shah I, Ahman E, Henshaw S, Bankole A. Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008. Lancet 2012;379:325-32.

  2. Juarez F, Singh S, García SG, Díaz-Olavarrieta C. Estimates of Induced Abortion in Mexico: what´s changed between 1990 and 2006? Int. Family Planning Perspectives 2008; 34, n°4. Disponible en: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/ journals/3415808.html

  3. Schiavon R, Troncoso E, Polo G. Analysis of maternal and abortion-related mortality in Mexico over the last two decades, 1990-2008. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2012;118S S14–S22.

  4. Salud Reproductiva Información Básica de México. Ipas México AC. 2014.

  5. Dayananda I, Walker D, Atienzo EE, Haider S. Abortion practice in Mexico: a survey of health care providers. Contraception 2012;85:304-10

  6. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems, Second edition, Geneva, 2012.

  7. Centro Nacional de Equidad de Género y Salud Reproductiva. Prevención, diagnóstico y manejo de la hemorragia obstétrica. Lineamiento Técnico, Secretaría de Salud, México 2009.

  8. Hoja Informativa: Leyes del Aborto en México, GIRE 2008. Disponible en: http://www.gire.org.mx/publicaciones/ hojas-informativas/leyesabortomexiconov08.pdf

  9. Schiavon R. Collado ME, Troncoso E. et al. Characteristics of private abortion services in Mexico City after legalization. Reproductive Health Matters 2010;18:127-135.

  10. Leke RJ, de Gil MP, Távara L, Faúndes A. The FIGO working group on the prevention of unsafe abortion: mandate and process for achievement. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010;110 Suppl:S20-4.

  11. Faúndes A. Strategies for the prevention of unsafe abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;119 Suppl 1:S68-71. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

  12. Fernandes KG, Camargo RP, Duarte GA, Faúndes A, Sousa MH, Maia Filho NL, Pacagnella RC. Knowledge of medical abortion among Brazilian medical students. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;118 Suppl.

  13. Kestler E. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge of and attitudes toward medical abortion in Guatemala. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;116:120-3.

  14. Garcia S, Lara D, Goldman L. Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas de los médicos mexicanos sobre el aborto: Resultados de una encuesta nacional. Gac Med Mex 2003;139:S91-102.

  15. García-Nuñez N, Atienzo E, Deyananda I, Walker D. Legislación, conocimientos y actitudes de profesionales médicos en relación al aborto en México. Salud Colectiva 2013;9:235-246.

  16. Sorhaindo A, Karver T, Karver J, Garcia S. Constructing a validated scale to measure community-level abortion stigma in Mexico 2014. En revisión.

  17. NOM-046-SSA2-2005, Violencia familiar, sexual y contra las mujeres. Criterios para la Prevención y Atención.

  18. USAID and ACCESS-FP, Postabortion Care Curriculum: Reference Manual, 2010. Disponible en http://www.postabortioncare. org/training/PAC_Manual.pdf

  19. WHO, Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors, 2003, WHO: Geneva.

  20. Winikoff B, Dzuba I, Chong E, Goldberg A, Lichtenberg ES, Ball C, et al. Extending Outpatient Medical Abortion Services Through 70 Days of Gestational Age. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012;120:1070-76.

  21. Schiavon R, Troncoso E, Polo G. Use of Health System Data to Study Morbidity Related to Pregnancy Loss. In: Singh S, Remez L and Tartaglione A. Methodologies for Estimating Abortion Incidence and Abortion-Related Morbidity and Mortality: A Review, New York: Guttmacher Institute; Paris: IUSSP, Dec 2010. Disponible en: http:// www.guttmacher.org/pubs/compilations/IUSSP/IUSSPChapter11. pdf






>Journals >Ginecología y Obstetricia de México >Year 2015, Issue 01
 

· Journal Index 
· Links 






       
Copyright 2019