Entrar/Registro  
HOME SPANISH
 
Cirujano General
   
MENU

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board






>Journals >Cirujano General >Year 2011, Issue 3


Arenas MH, Hernández ZJF, Carvajal MJA, Jiménez TJ, Baltazar SI, Flores VM
Results of applying the surgical checklist in 60 patients
Cir Gen 2011; 33 (3)

Language: Español
References: 22
Page: 156-162
PDF: 4. Kb.


Full text




ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the results of applying the surgical checklist to all patients subjected to surgery by our surgical team.
Setting: Private medical institution.
Design: Clinical prospective, cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study. Statistical analysis. Percentages as summary measure for qualitative variables.
Material and methods: The surgical checklist was applied to 60 patients subjected to elective and emergency surgery in the General Surgery specialty performed by the same surgical team. We analyzed the events that altered the surgical flow related to environmental, technological factors, as well as those concerning supplies, team work, training, procedures, and others.
Results: In the 60 patients in whom the surgical checklist was applied, 30 events were detected that altered the normal flow of the surgery, without having an impact on the patient. Of these, 13 were quasi-failures. The detected quasi-failures were a Sevorane leak, an oxygen leak in the anesthesia machines, missing of a suture needle in the final count, which was then found in the cavity, surgery packs inadequately sterilized with moist dressings, lack of surgical stapler due to wrong handling by the personnel, wrong stapler for the procedure to be performed, patient under spinal block whose arms were not held in place and caused contamination of the surgical field. All these events caused disruption of the surgical flow.
Conclusion: The surgical checklist is a very useful tool to reduce adverse events in a surgical procedure.


Key words: Patient safety, checklist, safe surgery.


REFERENCIAS

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson M. To Err is Human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 1999.

  2. Arenas MH, Anaya PR. Errores en cirugía. Estrategias para mejorar la seguridad quirúrgica. Cir Cir 2008; 76: 355-361.

  3. Rodríguez SJ, Mata MP. Calidad de la práctica médica y medicina basada en evidencia. Rev Conamed 2007; 12(2): 8-14.

  4. Gutiérrez-Vega R. Seguridad del paciente: conceptos y antecedentes. Rev Conamed 2007; 12(2): 4-7.

  5. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008; 372: 139-144.

  6. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Richards MD, Steele L, Dellinger EP, Fry DE, et al. Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: baseline results from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Arch Surg 2005; 140; 174-182.

  7. Bratzler DW, Houck PM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the national surgical infection prevention project. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38; 1706-1715.

  8. Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD. Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 269-276.

  9. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Alianza Mundial para la Seguridad del Paciente. La Cirugía Segura salva vidas. Segundo reto mundial por la seguridad del paciente. 2008. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2008/WHO_IER_PSP_2008.07_spa.pdf

  10. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 491-499.

  11. Parker SE, Laviana AA, Wadhera RK, Wiegmann DA, Sundt TM 3rd. Development and evaluation of an observational tool for assessing surgical flow disruptions and their impact on surgical performance. World J Surg 2010; 34: 353-361.

  12. Ruelas BE, Sarabia GO, Tovar VW. Seguridad en el paciente hospitalizado. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública Editorial Panamericana 2007.

  13. Mills P, Neily J, Dunn E. Teamwork and communication in surgical teams: Implications for patient safety. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 107-112.

  14. Lingard L, Regehr G, Orser B, Reznick R, Baker GR, Doran D, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Arch Surg 2008; 143: 12-18.

  15. Sexton JB, Makary MA, Tersigni AR, Pryor D, Hendrich A, Thomas EJ, et al. Teamwork in the operating room: frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology 2006; 105: 877-884.

  16. Ranji SR, Shojania KG. Implementing patient safety interventions in your hospital: what to try and what to avoid. Med Clin North Am 2008; 92: 275-293.

  17. Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA. Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 353-358.

  18. Guanche GH. Un análisis ético por la calidad de la atención médica quirúrgica. Rev Cubana Cir [Revista en la Internet]. 2007 Sep [citado 2011 Sep 18] ; 46(3): Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932007000300012&lng=es

  19. Campaña VG. Errores médicos en el ambiente quirúrgico. ¿Cómo prevenirlos? Parte 1 Generalidades. Rev Chil Cir 2006; 58: 235-238.

  20. Conley DM, Singer SJ, Edmondson L, Berry WR, Gawande AA. Effective surgical safety checklist implementation. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212: 873-879.

  21. Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E, Kneebone R, Sevdalis N. Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212: 234-243.

  22. Souba C. Perspective: The language of leadership. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1609-1618.






>Journals >Cirujano General >Year 2011, Issue 3
 

· Journal Index 
· Links 






       
Copyright 2019