Entrar/Registro  
HOME SPANISH
 
Cirujano General
   
MENU

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board






>Journals >Cirujano General >Year 2016, Issue 3


Campos A
The elderly surgeon and the scalpel of Damocles
Cir Gen 2016; 38 (3)

Language: Español
References: 21
Page: 167-174
PDF: 4. Kb.


Full text




ABSTRACT

Different metaphors apply to the elderly, which are in part adequate but incomplete. They do not properly describe their personal situation in the face of their decline, their life that is over, their project pending. In the surgeon this situation is special, because in aging not only his professional practice, but the consequences on his patients are at stake. Several dilemmas are addressed; the first, as The Sword of Damocles, a metaphor that fits his problem well. Seen as a dilemma, he must decide whether to stand before the operating table with the sword upon his head, or retire, and both options have serious consequences for his future. The second, as a pendulum, the decision between an altruism exacerbated by an increasingly unfavorable economic and social panorama, and the selfishness of self-care against the demands of the other. One is synchronous, the other diachronic. The surgeon may want to take care of himself to become old, under the risk of not fulfilling and no longer being able to consummate what he aspired for, or he may be entirely devoted to the exercise of his art, at the risk of his morbidity and mortality. The dilemma is threefold; between the others and his, between now and tomorrow, between contemplation and action.


Key words: Elderly, surgeon, dilemma, moral judgment, bioethics.


REFERENCIAS

  1. Horacio. Odas III, 1, 17-21. En: Rudd N. (ed. trad.) Horace. Odes and Epodes. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 2004. p. 140-142.

  2. Cicero MT. Tusculanae disputationes. L 5, vv 61-62. (ed. Puhlenz M.) Leipzig, Teubner. 1918. En: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0044%3Abook%3D5%3Asection%3D62. Consultado el 13/12/2016.

  3. Cicerón MT. Discusiones tusculanas. (tr. Pimentel J. Consejo Dirección General de Publicaciones, Secretaría de Educación Pública. Ciudad de México; 1985. p. 147-148.

  4. McCallum J. Health in the “Grey” Millenium. Romanticism versus complexity? En: Weisstub D, Thomasma DC, Gauthier S y Tomossy GF (eds.) Aging: Culture, Health, and Social Change. Dordrecht: Springer; 2001. p. 29-42.

  5. Pliny the Elder. (Gaius Plinius Secundus). (trad. Bostock J.) The Natural History. Book 8, chap. 35. Londres. Taylor and Francis, 1855. En: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0137:book=8:chapter=35&highlight= Consultado el 13/12/2016.

  6. Campos A. La vulnerabilidad, una anfisbena. Cir Gen. 2011; 33: S186-S190.

  7. Lee R, Mason A, Cotlear D. Some economic consequences of global aging - a discussion note for the world bank. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington/The World Bank, Washington DC, Nov. 2010.

  8. Rawls J. Kantian constructivism in moral theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 1980; 77(9): 515-572.

  9. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Ed. revisada); 1999. p. 510 y 511.

  10. O’ Neal O. Constructivism in Rawls and Kant. En: Freeman S. The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 347-367.

  11. Thane PM. Changing paradigms of aging and being older. En: Weisstub D, Thomasma DC, Gauthier S y Tomossy GF, eds. Aging: culture, health, and social change. Dordrecht: Springer; 2001. p. 1-14.

  12. Edelstein L. The distinctive hellenism of greek medicine. En: Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein. (O Temkin, LC Temkin, eds.) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1967. p. 374.

  13. Edelstein L. The ethics of the greek physician. En: Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein. (O Temkin, LC Temkin, eds.) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1967. p. 326.

  14. Carrick P. The status of the physician. En: Medical ethics in the ancient world. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2001. p. 11-26.

  15. Jones WHS. Hippocrates II, V. Ancient Medical Etiquette. Loeb Classical Library; 1959. p. xxxiii.

  16. Temkin, O. The rise of galenism as a medical philosophy. En: Galenism: Rise and Decline of a Medical Philosophy. Cornell University Press; 1973. p. 51-94.

  17. Cicerón MT. De officiis. (ed. Griffin MT & Atkins EM.) Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 1991, Liber I, 151, p.58. También Cicero. De Officiis (tr. Walter Miller) Londres; William Heinemann, 1928, Liber I, 151, p. 154.

  18. Pliny the Elder. (Gaius Plinius Secundus). Natural History. (tr. Rackham H.) Vol. II, Libro VII, Cap. 51, 168. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1961. p. 618-619.

  19. Campos A. El dilema bioético ante la iatrogenia del otro – mis colegas ¿serán como hermanos? Cir Gen. 2016; 38: 105-110.

  20. Homer. The Odyssey (tr. Murray AT.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, Ltd; 1919. Libro XII. p. 234-260.

  21. Gadow S. Recovering the body in aging. En: Jecker NS (ed.) Aging and ethics. Philosophical Problems in Gerontology. Nueva York; Springer Science+Business Media; 1992. p. 113-120.






>Journals >Cirujano General >Year 2016, Issue 3
 

· Journal Index 
· Links 






       
Copyright 2019