Entrar/Registro  
HOME SPANISH
 
Acta Ortopédica Mexicana
   
MENU

Contents by Year, Volume and Issue

Table of Contents

General Information

Instructions for Authors

Message to Editor

Editorial Board






>Journals >Acta Ortopédica Mexicana >Year 2003, Issue 5


Lira RJM, Hernández RC, Aguilar-Águila MMA
Early surgery vs late one in acute-traumatic cervical spine lesion
Acta Ortop Mex 2003; 17 (5)

Language: Español
References: 23
Page: 216-220
PDF: 4. Kb.


Full text




ABSTRACT

We have performed a retrospective study whose objective was to compare neurological change results, days spent in hospital, and complications associated to early surgery (less than three days) or late one (over than 3 days) in patients suffering from acute-traumatic cervical spine lesion. From 1998 to 2001, it was carried out an analysis of the records from patients having been diagnosed cervical fracture or luxation with neurological lesion and fulfilling inclusion requisites. Two groups arose: early surgery n = 13, and late surgery n = 11. In both groups the neurological condition was analyzed at admission and discharge, days in hospital, and associated complications. Both groups were similar in age, sex, and lesion mechanism. There was no significant difference in neurological recovery, days in hospital, and associated complications (p › 0.05). Actually, there was a significant difference in regard to intensive therapy period (p ‹ 0.05). We recommend treating these patients in a surgical way seventy-two hours after the lesion, once the patient’s general condition is stable.


Key words: spinal cord injuries, surgery, whiplash injuries.


REFERENCIAS

  1. American Spinal Injury Association: Standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury patients. Chicago, American Spinal Injury Association, 1984.

  2. Ball P: Critical care of spinal cord injury. Spine 2001; 26(24S): S27-S30.

  3. Bohlman, D’Ambrosia: Clasificación de las fracturas y luxaciones de la columna cervical. Musculoskeletal disorders, the neck cap. 6 Philadelphia. J.B. Lippincott 1977.

  4. Braken MB, et al: Efficacy of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. JAMA 1984; 251: 45-52.

  5. Braken MB, et al: Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal cord injury: 1 year follow-up data-Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. Neurosurgery. 1992; 76: 23-31.

  6. Croce MA, Bee TK, Pritchard E, Miller PR, Fabian TC: Does Optimal timing for spine fracture fixation exist? Ann Surg 2001; 233(6): 851-858.

  7. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, Vernon JD, Walsh JJ: The value of postural reduction in initial management of closed injury of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969; 7(3): 179-192.

  8. Heller JG: Anatomy of the cervical spine. The cervical spine. 3rd edition. Lippincott. Philadelphia 1998.

  9. Katoh S, el Marsy WS, Jaffray D, McCall IW, Eisenstein SM, Pringle RG, Pullicino V, Ikata T: Neurologic outcome in conservatively treated patients with incomplete closed traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries. Spine 1996; 21(20): 2345-2351.

  10. Mark N: Blood pressure management after acute spinal Cord injury. Neurosurgery 2002; 50(3): S166-172.

  11. Mark N: Clinical assessment after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 2002; 50(3S): S21-S29.

  12. Mark N: Initial closed reduction of cervical spine fracture-dislocation injuries. Neurosurgery 2002; 50(3): S44-S50.

  13. McLain RF, Benson DR: Urgent surgical stabilization of spinal fractures in polytrauma patients. Spine 1999; 24(16): 1646-1654.

  14. Michael G, Charles H: An evidence based review of descompressive surgery in acute spinal cord injury: rationale, indications, and timing base on experimental and clinical studies. J Neurosurg Mark N. Blood pressure management after spinal cord injury (spine 1) 1999; 91: 1-11.

  15. Michael G, Lali H, Charles T: The role and timing of decompression in acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001; 26(24S): S101-S110.

  16. Michael L: Pharmacological therapy after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 2002; (Suppl 3): S63-S72.

  17. Mirza SK, Krengel WF 3rd, Chapman JR, Andreson PA, Bailey JC, Grady MS, Yuan HA: Early versus delayed surgery for acute cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1999; 359: 104-114.

  18. Papadopoulos SM, Selden NR, Quint DJ, Patel N, Gillespie B, Grube S: Immediate spinal cord decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: feasibility and outcome. J Trauma 2002; 52(2): 323-332.

  19. Schelegel J, Bayley J, Yuan H, Frederickson B: Timing of surgical decompression and fixation of acute spinal fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1996; 10(5): 323-330.

  20. Tator CH, Fehlings MG, Thorpe K, Taylor W: Current use and timing of spinal surgery for management of acute spinal cord injury in North America: results of a retrospective multicenter study. J Neurosurg 91 (spine 1) 1999: 12-18.

  21. Vaccaro AR, Daugherty RJ, Sheehan TP, Dante SJ, Cotler JM, Balderston RA, Herbison GJ, Northrup BE: Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 1997; 22(22): 2609-2613.

  22. Winkelstein BA, Myers BS: The biomechanics of cervical spine injury and implications for injury prevention. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29(Suppl. 7): 246-255.

  23. Winslow C, Bode RK, Felton D, Chen D, Meyer PR Jr: Impact of respiratory complications on Length of stay and Hospital Costs in acute Cervical Spine Injury. Chest 2002; 12l(5); 1548-1554.






>Journals >Acta Ortopédica Mexicana >Year 2003, Issue 5
 

· Journal Index 
· Links 






       
Copyright 2019