Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

Valles FJFJ, Malacara BM, Gómez MLG, Suárez ACE, Cárdenas EJL
Surgical treatment of hip fractures
Acta Ortop Mex 2010; 24 (4)

Language: Español
References: 17
Page: 242-247
PDF: 0. Kb.

[Fulltext - PDF]

ABSTRACT

Objective: evaluate the experience acquired in the surgical management of hip fractures. Material and methods: retrospective study of 206 patients undergoing surgical treatment of hip fracture from June 2005 to June 2007. Besides the demographic variables, the following variables were recorded: Fracture classification, interval between the occurrence of the fracture and its surgical treatment, physical status according to the American Society of Anesthesiology classification, preoperative comorbid conditions, type of implant used, approach used if a prosthesis was used, operative time, prophylaxis with antibiotics and for thromboembolic events, complications during the postoperative period and during a 24-month follow-up period. A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out. Results: fifty patients were males and 156 females, mean age was 80 years (50-99 years). The most frequent types of fractures were the intertrochanteric fracture (130 patients) and the displaced intracapsular fracture (38 patients). The most frequent surgical procedures were the placement of a compression ring and plate (133 patients) and hemiarthroplasty (49 patients). Ten patients had various postoperative complications. Two patients died during the follow-up period (24 months). Conclusions: fixation was performed in young patients with undisplaced fractures and in all patients with an impacted and stable subcapital fracture. Arthroplasty was preferred in patients with a displaced fracture.


Key words: hip fracture, fixation, arthroplasty, postoperative complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Gjertsen JE, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Steindal K, et al: The Norwegian hip fracture register. Acta Orthopaedica 2008; 79: 583-93.

  2. Lofthus CM, Osnes EK, Falch JA, Kaastad TS, Kristiansen IS, Nordsletten L, et al: Epidemiology of hip fractures in Oslo, Norway. Bone 2001; 29: 413-8.

  3. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA: World-wide projections for hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 1997; 7: 407-13.

  4. Sistema Nacional de Información en Salud. Egresos Hospitalarios. www.sinais.salud.gob.mx

  5. Iorio R, Schwartz B, Macaulay W, Teney S Healy WL, York S: Surgical treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 1124-33.

  6. Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O: A prospective randomized trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84: 183-8.

  7. Yih-Shiunn L, Shih-Hao CH, Yang-Hwen T, Hui-Ling H, Ting-Ying L, Chien-Rae H: Internal fixation of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A retrospective comparison of fixation methods. J Trauma 2008; 64: 155-62.

  8. Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF: Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2006; 88: 249-60.

  9. Ong BC, Maurer SG, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ: Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty: Functional outcome after femoral neck fracture at a minimum of thirty-six months of follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16: 317-22.

  10. Gjertsen JE, Vinje T, Stein AL, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI, Furnes O: Patient satisfaction, pain, and quality of life 4 months after displaced femoral neck fractures: A comparison of 663 fractures treated with internal fixation and 906 with bipolar hemiarthroplasty reported to the Norwegian hip fracture register. Acta Orthopaedica 2008; 79: 594-601.

  11. Enocson A, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H, Lapidus LJ: Dislocation of hemiarthorplasty after femoral neck fracture: Better outcome after the anterolateral approach in a prospective cohort study on 739 consecutive hips. Acta Orthopaedica 2008; 79: 211-7.

  12. Roche JJW, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG: Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: Prospective observational cohort study. BMJ: doi 10.1136/bmj.38643.663843.55 (published 18 november 2005).

  13. U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). En: http//www.hippa.org/.

  14. American Society of Anaesthesiologists. New Classification of physical status. Anaesthesiology 1963: 111.

  15. Thorngren KG, Hommel A, Norrman PO, Thorngren I, Wingstrand H: Epidemiology of femoral neck fractures. Injury 2002; (Suppl 3) 33: C1-C7.

  16. Blomfeldt R, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S, Soderqvist A, Tidermark J: Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients with severe cognitive impairment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005b; 87: 523-9.

  17. Merrer J, Girou E, Lortat-Jacob A, Montravers P, Lucet JCH: Surgical site infection after surgery to repair femoral neck fracture: A French multicenter retrospective study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28: 1169-74.