Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

López‑Gavito EG, Parra‑Téllez P, Pérez‑Barrera I, León‑Hernández SR, Vázquez‑Escamilla J
Pronostic factors associated with the results of subtalar arthrodesis
Acta Ortop Mex 2019; 33 (4)

Language: Español
References: 28
Page: 211-216
PDF: 116.28 Kb.

[Fulltext - PDF]

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Subtalar arthrodesis is a surgical stabilization procedure in the isolated pathology of the subastragaline joint that does not respond to conservative treatment, its goal is to obtain a solid fusion of the joint to eliminate or improve pain and function, normalizing the distribution of foot loads and alignment of the foot. There are studied variables that interfere with the surgical outcome of patients treated with subtalar arthrodesis such as: smoking, age, sex, osteoarthritis, BMI, rehabilitation, osteosynthesis material and surgical technique. Objective: To know the prognostic factors associated with the results of subastragaline arthrodesis. Material and methods: Retrospective, longitudinal, descriptive study with review of files and conducting descriptive statistics of treated cases of August 2012- Jan 2016 with subtalar arthrodesis to identify predictive factors affecting the outcome. Results: 29 feet were analyzed, reporting a successful arthrodesis in 21 cases (72.4%), in 82.8% the surgical technique was adequate. The complication rate was 20.7% On the AOFAS scale 55.2% were reported as a very good result, 27.6% good and only 17.2% regular. The factors associated with good outcome were sex and postoperative rehabilitation. Discussion: The subtalar arthrodesis provides improvement in pain and alignment, at our service this procedure presents a success rate of 72.4%, among the factors associated with statistical significance was rehabilitation and sex.


Key words: Subtalar arthrodesis, risk factors, hind foot.


REFERENCES

  1. Easley ME, Trnka MD, Schon LC, Myerson MS. Isolated subtalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(5): 613-24.

  2. Davies MB, Rosenfeld PF, Stavrou P, Saxby TS. A comprehensive review of subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28(3): 295-7.

  3. Chou LB, Halligan BW. Treatment of severe, painful pes planovalgus deformity with hindfoot arthrodesis and wedge-shaped tri-cortical allograf. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28(5): 569-74.

  4. Mann RA, Beaman DN, Horton GA. Isolated subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19(8): 511-9.

  5. Johnson KA. Master de cirugía ortopédica pie y tobillo. Deborah Ravin. 29: 359-68.

  6. Joveniaux P, Harisboure A, Ohl X, Dehoux E. Long-term results of in situ subtalar arthrodesis. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(8): 1199-205.

  7. Núñez-Samper PM, Llanos LF, Viladot RP. Técnicas quirúrgicas en cirugía del pie. Masson. 2013; 24: 192-4.

  8. Carranza A, Fernández J, Castillo G, Tejero S, Alegrete A, Fernández J. Técnica de artrodesis subastragalina mediante cirugía de mínima incisión. Rev Pie Tobillo. 2015; 29(1): 42-51.

  9. Maceira E, Monteagudo de la Rosa M. Mecánica clínica y terapéutica pie y tobillo. Madrid. 2010; 9: 195-207.

  10. Miralles MF, Sanz RJ, Lizaur UA. Valoración de la artrodesis subastragalina en el tratamiento de la artrosis tras fractura de calcáneo. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 2002; 46(3): 221-6.

  11. Chandler JT, Bonar SK, Anderson RB, Davis WH. Results of in situ subtalar arthrodesis for late sequelae of calcaneus fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20(1): 18-24.

  12. Myerson M, Quill GE Jr. Late complications of fracture of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993; 75(3): 331-41.

  13. Chen YJ, Huang TJ, Hsu KY, Hsu RW, Chen CW. Subtalar distractional realignment arthrodesis with wedge bone grafting and lateral decompression for calcaneal malunion. J Trauma. 1998; 45(4): 729-37.

  14. Arias GJ, Calero FR, Alcántara JP, Llabrés AJ. Artrodesis subastragalinas como tratamiento de las secuelas de las fracturas del calcáneo: resultados a largo plazo. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 1999; 43(1): 37-43.

  15. Mann RA, Baumgarten M. Subtalar fusion of isolated subtalar disorders. Clin Orthop. 1988; 226: 260-5.

  16. Dahm DL, Kitaoka HB. Subtalar arthrodesis with internal compression for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998; 80(1): 134-8.

  17. Sangeorzan BJ, Smith D, Veith R, Hansen ST Jr. Triple arthrodesis using internal fixation in treatment of adult foot disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 294: 299-307.

  18. Sammarco GJ, Tablante EB. Subtalar arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 349: 73-80.

  19. Johansson JE, Harrison J, Greenwood FA. Subtalar arthrodesis for adult traumatic arthritis. Foot Ankle. 1982; 2(5): 294-8.

  20. Jardé O, Trinquier JL, Renaux P, Mauger S, Vives P. Subtalar arthrodesis for sequelae of calcaneal fractures. Apropos of 57 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1994; 80(8): 728-33.

  21. Ishikawa SN, Murphy GA, Richardson EG. The effect of cigarette smoking on hindfoot fusions. Foot Ankle Int. 2002; 23(11): 996-8.

  22. Rammelt S, Grass R, Zawadski T, Biewener A, Zwipp H. Foot function after subtalar distraction bone-block arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(5): 659-68.

  23. Huang PJ, Fu YC, Cheng YM, Lin SY. Subtalar arthrodesis for late sequelae of calcaneal fractures: fusion in situ versus fusion with sliding corrective osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20(3): 166-70.

  24. Amendola A, Lammens P. Subtalar arthrodesis using interposition iliac crest bone graft after calcaneal fracture. Foot Ankle Int. 1996; 17(10): 608-14.

  25. Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL. Subtalar arthrodesis for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and pes planus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; 345: 187-94.

  26. Thermann H, Hüfner T, Schratt E, Held C, Von Glinski S, Tscherne H. Long-term results of subtalar fusions after operative versus nonoperative treatment of os calcis fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20(7): 408-16.

  27. Carr JB, Hansen ST, Benirschke SK. Subtalar distraction bone block fusion for late complications of os calcis fractures. Foot Ankle. 1988; 9(2): 81-6.

  28. Cracchiolo A 3rd, Pearson S, Kitaoka HB, Grace D. Hindfoot arthrodesis in adults utilizing a dowel graft technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; 257: 193-203.