medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5057 (Impreso)
Investigación en Educación Médica

2018, Número 25

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Inv Ed Med 2018; 7 (25)


Introducción a los modelos de ecuaciones estructurales

Manzano PAP

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 30
Paginas: 67-72
Archivo PDF: 209.36 Kb.


RESUMEN

Los modelos de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM) son una herramienta estadística multivariada que permite estudiar la relación que hay entre variables latentes y observadas. Este artículo tiene el propósito de introducir, de forma sencilla y no muy teórica, a los SEM. Se describen los tipos de modelos, su representación gráfica, su identificabilidad, las técnicas de estimación de parámetros y la valoración de su ajuste. Se incluye además un ejemplo para ilustrar esta metodología estadística.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Westland JC. Structural equation models: From paths to networks. Springer. 2015:175.

  2. Jöreskog K, Sörbom D. LISREL 9.3. Scientific Software International. 2008.

  3. Lawley DN. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of􀀃maximum􀀃likelihood.􀀃Proceedings􀀃of􀀃the􀀃Royal􀀃Society􀀃Edin-􀀃􀀃 burgh.􀀃1940;60:64---82.

  4. Jöreskog KG. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1969;34:183---202.

  5. Stata Corp. Stata: Release 13. Statistical Software College Station; 2013.

  6. Rosseel Y. Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012;48:1---36.

  7. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.

  8. Bartholomew DJ, Steele F, Galbraith J, Moustaki I. Analysis of multivariate social science data. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall; 2008.

  9. Stage FK, Cartyer HC, Nora A. Path analysis: An introduction and analysis􀀃of􀀃a􀀃decade􀀃of􀀃research.􀀃Journal􀀃of􀀃Education􀀃Research. 2004;98:5---12.

  10. Keith TZ. Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2015.

  11. Mulaik SA. Foundations of factor analysis. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2009.

  12. Loehlin JC, Beaujean AA. Latent variable models. An introduction to factor, path and structural equation analysis. 5th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2017.

  13. Nachtigall C, Kroehne U, Funke F, Steyer R. (Why) should we use SEM? Pros and cons of structural equation modeling. Methods of Psychological Research Online. 2003;8:1---22.

  14. Bollen KA. Total direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology. 1987;17:37---69.

  15. Bollen KA, Davis WR. Two rules of identification for structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2009;16:523---36.

  16. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: The Gildford Press; 2015.

  17. Bollen KA, Long JS. Testing structural equation models. California: SAGE; 1993.

  18. Muthén B. En: Bollen KA, Long JS, editores. Goodness of fit with categorical and other nonnormal variables. Testing structural equation models. California: SAGE; 1993. p. 205-234.

  19. Bentler PM, Yuan K. Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1999;34:181---97.

  20. Browne MW. Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 1984;37:62---83.

  21. Muthén B. Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. Journal of Econometrics. 1983;22:43---65.

  22. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A begginer´s guide to structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.

  23. Steiger JH. Point estimation, hypothesis testing and inter-val estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1990;25:173---80.

  24. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternati-ves. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999;6:1---55.

  25. Kim SS, Kaplowitz S, Johnston MV. The effects of physician empathy and patient􀀃 satisfaction and compliance. Evaluation & Health Professions. 2004;27:237---51.

  26. Mehrabian A, Epstein N. A measure of emotional empathy. Jour- nal of Personality. 1972;40:525---43.

  27. Olson JK. Relationships between nurse-expressed empathy, patient-perceived empathy and patient distress. Image:􀀃 The Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1995;27:317---22.

  28. Squier R. A model of empathic understanding and adherence to treatment regimens in practitioner-patient relationships.􀀃Social Science & Medicine. 1990;30:325---39.

  29. Hermida R. The problem of allowing correlated errors in structural equation modeling: concerns and considerations. Computational Methods in Social Sciences. 2015;3:1---17.

  30. Farrell AD. Structural equation modeling with longitudinal data: Strategies for examining group differences and recipro-cal relationships. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1994;62:477---87.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com