medigraphic.com
ENGLISH

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science

ISSN 2954-3835 (Digital)
ISSN 2683-2828 (Impreso)
Antes Revista Mexicana de Cardiología

Ver Revista Mexicana de Cardiología


  • Mostrar índice
  • Números disponibles
  • Información
    • Información general        
    • Directorio
  • Publicar
    • Instrucciones para autores        
    • Envío de artículos
  • medigraphic.com
    • Inicio
    • Índice de revistas            
    • Registro / Acceso
  • Mi perfil

2021, Número S3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Cardiovasc Metab Sci 2021; 32 (S3)


Diagnóstico de aterosclerosis coronaria mediante estudios no invasivos: ecocardiografía, tomografía computarizada

Gutiérrez-Fajardo P, Sierra-Galán LM
Texto completo Cómo citar este artículo 10.35366/100807

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/100807
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/100807

Idioma: Inglés [English version]
Referencias bibliográficas: 16
Paginas: s253-257
Archivo PDF: 337.73 Kb.


PALABRAS CLAVE

Sin palabras Clave




REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Roth GA, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray CJL et al. Temporal trends in ischemic heart disease mortality in 21 world regions, 1980 to 2010. The global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014; 129: 1483-1492.

  2. Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013. multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: 380-406.

  3. Marwick TH. Stress echocardiography. Heart. 2003; 89: 113-118.

  4. Nesto RW, Kowalchuk GJ. The ischemic cascade: temporal sequence of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 59: 23C-30C.

  5. Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, Chen MH, Marshall JE, Porter TR et al. Guidelines for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease: from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020; 33 (1): 1-41.e8.

  6. Pizzi C, Xhyheri B, Costa GM, Faustino M, Flacco ME, Gualano MR et al. Nonobstructive versus obstructive coronary artery disease in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5 (12): e004185.

  7. Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD, Cheezum M, Choi AD, Han BK et al. SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016; 10 (6): 435-449.

  8. Kennington E. Reducing radiation in CT angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009; 6 (5): 325.

  9. Heckner M, Deseive S, Massberg S, Stocker TJ, Hausleiter J, Lesser J et al. Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiation dose estimates of cardiac CT angiography in daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI). Eur Heart J. 2018; 39 (41): 3715-3723.

  10. Budoff MJ, Li D, Kazerooni EA, Thomas GS, Mieres JH, Shaw LJ. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive 64-row computed tomographic coronary angiography (CCTA) compared with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI): the PICTURE study, a prospective multicenter trial. Acad Radiol. 2017; 24 (1): 22-29.

  11. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52 (21): 1724-1732.

  12. Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, Nichols JH, Rogers IS, Seneviratne SK et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53 (18):1642-1650.

  13. Sun Z, Xu L. Coronary CT angiography in the quantitative assessment of coronary plaques. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 346380.

  14. Otsuka K, Fukuda S, Tanaka A, Nakanishi K, Taguchi H, Yoshikawa J et al. Napkin-ring sign on coronary CT angiography for the prediction of acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6 (4): 448-457.

  15. Lee JH, Han D, Danad I, Hartaigh BO, Lin FY, Min JK. Multimodality imaging in coronary artery disease: focus on computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016; 24 (1): 7-17.

  16. Kramer CM, Taylor AJ, Liaison WG, Mcgann C, Rosenberg A, Schwartz R et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010; 4 (6): 407.e1-407.e33.




Figura 1

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cardiovasc Metab Sci . 2021;32

ARTíCULOS SIMILARES

CARGANDO ...