medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2022, Número 1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

salud publica mex 2022; 64 (1)


Validez y confiabilidad del Cuestionario Internacional de Actividad Física versión larga en una submuestra de maestras mexicanas

Medina C, Monge A, Denova-Gutiérrez E, López-Ridaura R, Barquera S, Romieu I, Lajous M

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 36
Paginas: 57-65
Archivo PDF: 348.63 Kb.


RESUMEN

Objetivo. Evaluar la confiabilidad y validez del Cuestionario Internacional de Actividad Física versión larga (por sus siglas en inglés IPAQ-long form). Material y métodos. Un total de 86 maestras realizaron entrevistas y visitas a clínicas en la Ciudad de México. En un periodo de 22 meses, se obtuvieron los niveles de actividad física (AF) por medio de un acelerómetro (AC) (meses 6 y 22) y autorreporte de actividad física por medio del IPAQ versión larga (meses 1, 3, 6, 9 y 12). Se estimaron los minutos por semana de actividad física moderada (AFM), caminando (AFC), vigorosa (AFV) y actividad física moderada-vigorosa (AFMV) para cada intensidad y dominio. Las variables se transformaron logarítmicamente. Se utilizaron correlaciones de intraclase y de Pearson para determinar la relación de los minutos por semana de AFM, AFC, AFMV entre instrumentos. Resultados. La confiabilidad entre el promedio de los IPAQs varió entre intensidades y dominios (de r = 0.24 a r = 0.65). Los minutos por semana de AFV y AFMV del acelerómetro 1 (AC1) se asociaron con los del Cuestionario Internacional de Actividad Física 3 (IPAQ3) (r = 0.60 y r = 0.31, respectivamente) reportado una semana después. Conclusiones. La versión larga del IPAQ es confiable para estimar AFMV y válido para evaluar AFMV y AFV en una submuestra de maestras mexicanas.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9

  2. Stern MC, Barnoya J, Elder JP, Gallegos-Carrillo K. Diet, physical activity, obesity and related cancer risk: strategies to reduce cancer burden in the Americas. Salud Publica Mex. 2019;61(4):448-55. https://doi. org/10.21149/9753

  3. Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(3):197-206. https://doi. org/10.1136/bjsm.37.3.197

  4. Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Chen KY. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(13):119- 23. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546

  5. Chen KY, Bassett DR. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S490-500.

  6. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth M, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381-95. https://doi. org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

  7. Medina C, Barquera S, Janssen I. Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire among adults in Mexico. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;34(1):21-8.

  8. Pereira MA, FitzerGerald SJ, Gregg EW, Joswiak ML, Ryan WJ, Summinski RR, et al. A collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires for health-related research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(6 Suppl):S1-205.

  9. van Poppel MN, Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2010;40(7):565-600. https://doi. org/10.2165/11531930-000000000-00000

  10. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. EsMaestras [Internet]. Cuernavaca: ISNP, 2020 [cited July 2021]. Available from: https://www.insp.mx/centros/ salud-poblacional/esmaestras-521.html

  11. Lajous M, Ortiz-Panozo E, Monge A, Santoyo-Vistrain R, García-Anaya A, Yunes-Díaz E, et al. Cohort Profile: The Mexican Teachers’ Cohort (MTC). Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(2):e10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv123

  12. IPAQ-group. International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Downloadable questionnaires [Internet]. IPAQ Web site [cited October 20, 2020]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/questionnaire_links

  13. IPAQ-group. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-Short and Long Forms [Internet]. IPAQ Web site, 2005 [cited July 2021]. Available from: https:// sites.google.com/site/theipaq/

  14. Wong SL, Colley R, Connor-Gorber S, Tremblay M. Actical accelerometer sedentary activity thresholds for adults. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(4):587-91.

  15. Colley R, Connor-Gorber S, Tremblay MS. Quality control and data reduction procedures for accelerometry-derived measures of physical activity. Health Rep. 2010;21(1):63-6.

  16. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011;22(1):15-23.

  17. World Health Organization. Guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour [Internet]. Geneve: WHO, 2020 [cited January 2021]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128

  18. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series No. 894. 2000 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO [cited July 2021]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/42330?locale-attribute=es&

  19. Boon RM, Hamlin MJ, Steel GD, Ross JJ. Validation of the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF) with accelerometry. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(10):741-46. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.052167

  20. Hallal PC, Gomez LF, Parra DC, Lobelo F, Mosquera J, Florindo AA, et al. Lessons learned after 10 years of IPAQ use in Brazil and Colombia. J Phys Act Health. 2010;(Suppl2):S259-64. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.7.s2.s259

  21. Sebastiao E, Gobbi S, Chodzko-Zajko W, Schwingel A, Papini CB, Nakamura PM, et al. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form overestimates self-reported physical activity of Brazilian adults. Public Health. 2012;126(11):967-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.07.004

  22. Jauregui A, Salvo D, Medina C, Barquera S, Hammond D. Understanding the contribution of public- and restricted-access places to overall and domain-specific physical activity among Mexican adults: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228491. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0228491

  23. Melanson EL, Freedson PS. Physical activity assessment: a review of methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1996;36(5):385-396. https://doi. org/10.1080/10408399609527732

  24. Hallal PC, Victora CG. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(3):556. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000117161.66394.07

  25. Sallis JF, Buono MJ, Roby JJ, Carlson D, Nelson JA. The Caltrac accelerometer as a physical activity monitor for school-age children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22(5):698-703.

  26. Mahoney M, Freedson P. Assessment of physical activity from caltrac and Baecke questionnaire technique. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22(S80).

  27. Washburn RA, Cook TC, LaPorte RE. The objective assessment of physical activity in an occupationally active group. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1989;29(3):279-84.

  28. Gretebeck R, Montoye, H. Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;14:1167-72.

  29. Aadland E, Ylvisaker E. Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134606

  30. McClain JJ, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C. Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(9):1509-14. https://doi.org/10.1249/ mss.0b013e3180dc9954

  31. YanJun R, Meng S, QingMin L, YaYun T, YuKun D, LiMing L, et al. Validation of the Simplified Chinese-character Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form in Urban Community-dwelling Adults: a cross-sectional study in Hangzhou, China. Biomed Environ Sci. 2017;30(4):255-63. https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2017.035

  32. Macfarlane D, Chan A, Cerin E. Examining the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, long form (IPAQ-LC). Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(3):443-50. https://doi. org/10.1017/S1368980010002806

  33. Oyeyemi AL, Bello UM, Philemon ST, Aliyu HN, Majidadi RW, Oyeyemi AY. Examining the reliability and validity of a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, long form (IPAQ-LF) in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e005820. https:// doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005820

  34. Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2 Suppl):S1-14.

  35. Vandelanotte C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Philippaerts R, Sjöström M, Sallis J. Reliability and validity of a computerized and dutch version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). J Phys Act Health. 2005;2:63-75. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2.1.63

  36. Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(6):755-62. https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2005898




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com