medigraphic.com
ENGLISH

Cirugía y Cirujanos

  • Mostrar índice
  • Números disponibles
  • Información
    • Información general        
    • Directorio
  • Publicar
    • Instrucciones para autores        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Inicio
    • Índice de revistas            
    • Registro / Acceso
  • Mi perfil

2002, Número 6

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Cir Cir 2002; 70 (6)


Análisis de vocalizaciones en cobayos recién nacidos, normoyentes y con sordera provocada en períodos de soledad

Arch-Tirado E, Collado-Corona MA
Texto completo Cómo citar este artículo Artículos similares

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 76
Paginas: 442-448
Archivo PDF: 56.22 Kb.


PALABRAS CLAVE

retroalimentación auditiva, análisis de vocalizaciones, sordera y vocalizaciones, modelos animales.

RESUMEN

Antecedentes: en el área de audiología y foniatría es posible contar con un modelo biomédico. El objetivo del presente trabajo es analizar las vocalizaciones en cobayos recién nacidos con audición normal y con sordera provocada, en etapas tempranas del desarrollo. Métodos: para el estudio se utilizaron 10 camadas de cobayos pigmentados. Por camada se utilizaron a las dos hembras de mayor peso, a una de ellas se le destruyó la cóclea al nacimiento por métodos quirúrgicos. Cinco días a la semana se registraron las vocalizaciones que emitían hasta el día 15 postnacimiento. Se registró en series de seis minutos tanto a los controles como a los experimentales en soledad, este procedimiento se realizó por cada camada del estudio tanto a los controles (normoyentes) como a los experimentales (sordos). Resultados: se encontró que los animales normoyentes en comparación con los animales sordos producen sonidos con más armónicos. Al calcular el promedio y la desviación estándar de las frecuencias fundamentales de todos los registros y en ambos grupos se obtuvo para los normales 1,535.28 ± 659.95 y en los sordos de 1,332.75 ± 1,185.87 Hz con una diferencia significativa para p = 0.05. Discusión: los cobayos sordos vocalizan durante mayor tiempo y las vocalizaciones van perdiendo armónicos en comparación con los normoyentes que, a lo largo del tiempo sus vocalizaciones van siendo cada vez más elaboradas. Los resultados muestran la importancia de la retroalimentación auditiva para la maduración y desarrollo de vocalizaciones en esta especie.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Arch-Tirado E. Comunicación animal, información científica y tecnológica. 1991;13:7-10.

  2. González-Lima F, Finkenstadt T, Ewert JP. Learning-related activation in the auditory system of the rat produced by long-term habituation: a 2-deoxyglucose study. Brain Res 1989;498: 67-79.

  3. Snowdon CT. Affiliative processes and vocal development. Ann NY Acad Sci 1997;807:340-351.

  4. Snowdon CT, Hausberger M, editors. Social influences on vocal development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press;1997.

  5. Fay RR, Popper AN. Comparative hearing: mammals. New York: Spring-Verlag;1994.

  6. Knudsen EI. The role of auditory experience in the development and maintenance of sound localization. Trends Neurosci 1984;7:326-330.

  7. Brudzynski SM, Chiu EMC. Behavioral responses of laboratory rats to playback of 22 kHz ultrasonic calls. Physiol Beh 1995;57:1039-1044.

  8. Wang X, Merzenich MM, Beitel R. Schreiner CE. Representation of a species- specific vocalization in the primary auditory cortex of the common marmoset: temporal and spectral characteristics. Neurophysiol 1995;74: 2685-2706.

  9. Ball GF, Hulse SH. Birdsong. Am Psychol 1998;53:37-58.

  10. Nottebohm F, Alvarez-Buylla A, Cynx J, Kirn J, Ling CY, Nottebohm M, Suter R, Tolles A, William H. Song learning in birds: the relation between perception and production, philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biol Sci 1990;329:115-124.

  11. Pepperberg IM, McLaughlin MA. Effect of avian-human joint attention on allospecific vocal learning by African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 1996;110:286-297.

  12. Green S. Dialects in Japanese monkeys: vocal learning and cultural transmission of locale-specific vocal behaviour? Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie 1975;38:304-314.

  13. Petersen MR, Beecher MD, Zoloth SR, Moody DB, Stebbins WC. Neural lateralization of species-specific vocalizations by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Science 1978:202:324-327.

  14. Zoloth S, Green S. Monkey vocalizations and human speech: Parallels in perception? Brain Behav Evol 1979;16:430-442.

  15. Reiss D, McCowan B. Spontaneous vocal mimicry and production by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): evidence for vocal learning. J Comp Psychol 1993;107:301-312.

  16. McCowan B, Reiss D. Whistle contour development in captive-born infant bottlenose dolphins: role of learning. J Comp Psychol 1995;109 (3):242-260.

  17. McCowan B, Reiss D. Vocal learning in captive bottlenose dolphins: a comparison to humans and non-human animals. In: Snowdon CT, Hausberger M, editors. Social influences on vocal development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press;1997.pp.178-207.

  18. Golubeva TB. A delay in the development of hearing and a shift in the leading afferentation in the early behavioral ontogeny of birds. Zh Vysshe Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova 1994;44:992-1003.

  19. McCracken KG, Sheldon FH. Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. Proc Nat Acad Scie USA 1997;94:3833-3836.

  20. West MJ, King AP. Female visual displays affect the development of male song in the cowbird. Nature 1988;334:244-246.

  21. Brittan-Powell EF, Dooling RJ, Farabugh SM. Vocal development in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): contact calls. J Comp Psychol 1997;111:226-241.

  22. Clayton NS. El aprendizaje del canto en los pájaros. Mundo Científico 1990;11:636-644.

  23. Elowson MA, Snowdon CT, Sweet CJ. Ontogeny of trill and J-call vocalizations in the pygmy marmoset, Cebullea pygmea. Anim Beh 1992;43:703-715.

  24. Esser KH. Audio-vocal learning in a non-human mammal: the lesser spear-nosed bat Phyllostomus discolor. Neuro Report 1994;5:1718-1720.

  25. Hofer MA, Shair H. Ultrasonic vocalization during social interaction and isolation in 2-week-old rats. Dev Psychobiol 1978;11:495-504.

  26. Robertoux PL, Martin B, Le Roy I, Beau J, Marchaland C, Pérez-Díaz F, Cohem-Salmon C, Carlier M. Vocalizations in newborn mice: genetic analysis, Behav Geneti 1996;26:427-437.

  27. Newman JD. Squirrel monkey communication. In: Rosenblum LA, Coe CL, editors. Handbook of squirrel monkey research. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.pp.99-126.

  28. Poeggel G, Braum K. Early auditory filial learning in degus (Octodon degus): behavioral and autoradiographic studies. Brain Res 1996; 743:162-170.

  29. Cherry JA. Ultrasonic vocalizations by male hamsters: parameters of calling and effects of playbacks on female behaviour. Anim Behav 1989;38:138-153.

  30. Narins MP. Comunicación en las ranas. Invest Ciencia Oct 1995:66-71.

  31. White NR, González RN, Barfield RJ. Do vocalizations of the male rat elicit calling from the female? Behav Neural Biol 1993;59:76-78.

  32. Hofer MA, Shair H. Ultrasonic vocalizations, laryngeal braking and thermogenesis in rat pups: a reappraisal. Behav Neurosci 1993;107: 354-362.

  33. Roberts LH. Evidence for the laryngeal source of ultrasonic and audible cries of rodents. J Zool London 1975;175:243-257.

  34. West R, Larson CR. Laryngeal and respiratory activity during vocalization in macaque monkeys. J Voice 1993;7:54-68.

  35. Maskarinec AS, Cairns GF Jr, Butterfield EC, Weamer DK. Longitudinal observations of individual infant’s vocalizations. J Speech Hear Disord 1981;46:267-273.

  36. Snashall SE. Deafness in children. Bri J Hosp Med 1985;33:205-209.

  37. Wedell-Monning J, Lumley JM. Child deafness and mother-child interaction. Child Dev 1980;51:766-774.

  38. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early-and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102:1161-1171.

  39. Marler P, Waser MS. Role of auditory feedback in canary song development. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1997;91:8-16.

  40. Nordeen KW, Nordeen EJ. Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav Neural Biol 1992;57:58-66.

  41. Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Healy MP. Early sound deprivation and long-term hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:877-881.

  42. Hultcranz M, Snyder R, Rebscher S, Leake P. Effects of neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on the cochlear nucleus in cats. Hear Res 1991;54:272-280.

  43. Leake-Jones PA, Vivion MC, O’Reillg, BF, Merzenich MM. Deaf animal models for studies of a multichannel cochlear prosthesis. Hear Res 1982;8:225-246.

  44. Roman R, Ehert G. Development of sound production in normal, isolated, and deafened kittens during the first postnatal months. Dev Psychobiol 1985;17:629-649.

  45. Shipley C, Buchwald JS, Carterette EC. The role of auditory feedback in the vocalizations of cats. Exp Brain Res 1988;69:431-438.

  46. Coste RL, Pfingst BE. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;99:3099-3108.

  47. Talmage-Riggs G, Winter P, Ploog D, Mayer W. Effect of deafening on the vocal behavior of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Folia Primatol 1973;17.404-420.

  48. Ridgway SH, Carder DA. Hearing deficits measured in some Tursiops trucantus, and discovery of a deaf/mute dolphin. J Acous Soc Am 1997;101:590-594.

  49. D’Amato FR, Populin R. Mother-offspring interaction and pup development in genetically deaf mice. Behav Genet 1988;17:465-475.

  50. D’Amato FR. Infanticide by genetically deaf mice: possible evidence for and inhibiting function of pups ultrasonic calls. Aggress Behav 1988;13:25-28.

  51. D’Amato FR. Different strategies in alloparental behavior for male and female mice. Anim Behav 1989;36:1553-1555.

  52. Perier O, Alegría J, Buyse M, D’Alimonte G, Gilson D, Serniclaes W. Consequences of auditory deprivation in animals and humans. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1984;411:60-70.

  53. Steel KP, Bock GR. The nature of inherited deafness in deafness mice. Nature 1980;288:159-161.

  54. Truett GE, Brock JW, Lidl GM, Kloster CA. Stargazer (stg), new deafness mutant in the Zucker rat. Lab Anim Sci 1994;44:595-599.

  55. Asarch R, Abramson M, Litton WB. Surgical anatomy of the guinea pig ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975;84:250-255.

  56. Gil-Carcedo LM, Martín MC, Carranza MA, Benito JL. Abordaje quirúrgico del oído medio del cobaya. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1991;42:399-403.

  57. Goksu N, Haziroglu R, Kemaloglu Y, Nalan K, Bayramoglu I, Akyildiz N. Anatomy of the guinea pig temporal bone. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:699-704.

  58. Berryman J. Guinea pig vocalizations. Guinea Pig Newslett No. 2, 1970.

  59. Herman BH, Pankespp J. Effects of morphine and naloxone on separation distress and approach attachment: evidence for opiate mediation of social affect. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1978;9:213-220.

  60. Hennessy MB. Both prevention of physical contact and removal of distal cues mediate cortisol and vocalization responses of guinea pig pups to maternal separation in a novel environment. Physiol Behav 1988;43:7239-7233.

  61. Hennessy MB, Becker LA, O’Neil DR. Peripherally administered CRH suppresses the vocalizations of isolated guinea pig pups. Physiol Behav 1991;50:17-22.

  62. Hennessy MB, Tamborski A, Schliml P. The influence of maternal separation on plasma concentrations of ACTH epinephrine and norepinephrine in guinea pig pups. Physiol Behav 1989;45:1147-1152.

  63. Menescal de Oliveira L. Pain reaction after topical NA and lesion of the obex region in the alert guinea pig. Physiol Behav 1982;28: 413-416.

  64. Tamborski HA, Moore H, Lucot JB, Hennessy MB. Monoamine activity in anterior hypothalamus of guinea pig pups separated from their mothers. Behav Neurosci 1994;108:171-176.

  65. Famula TR, Oberbauer AM, Sousa CA. A threshold model analysis of deafness in dalmatians. Mamm Genome 1996;7:650-653.

  66. Holliday TA, Nelson HJ, Williams DC, Willits N. Unilateral and bilateral brainstem auditory-evoked response abnormalities in 900 dalmatian dogs. J Vet Intern Med 1992;6:166-174.

  67. Luttgen PJ. Deafness in the dog and cat. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1994;24:981-989.

  68. Montes de Oca FE, Saúl A, Escalante UC, Poblano A, Lagunes R. El vitiligo y la audición. Anal Otorrinolaringol Mex 1990;35:279-281.

  69. Schortt A, Spoendlin H. Pigment anomaly associated inner ear deafness. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1987;103:451-457.

  70. Strain GM, Kearney MT, Gingac IJ, Levesque DC, Nelson HJ, Tedford BC, Remsen LG. Brainstem auditory-evoked potential assessment of congenital deafness in dalmatians: associations with phenotypic markers. J Vet Intern Med 1992;6:175-182.

  71. Arch-Tirado E, Morales MJ, Saltijeral OJ, Zarco de CI, Licona J. The guinea pig as a model for audiological research. Anal Otorrinolaringol Mex 1997;42:71-74.

  72. Gil-Carcedo LM, Villalba J. El reflejo de Preyer en el cobayo normoyente. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1989;40:25-27.

  73. Arch-Tirado E, McCowan B, Saltijeral-Oaxaca J, Zarco de Coronado I, Licona-Bonilla J. Development of isolation-induced vocal behavior in normal hearing and deafened guinea pig infants. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000 Apr;43(2):432-440.

  74. Berryman J. Guinea-pig vocalizations: their structure, causation and function. Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychol 1976;41:80-106.

  75. Chris JC, Els A den Os, Koopmans-van Beinum FJ. The development of vocalizations of deaf and normally hearing infants. Proceedings Inst Phonet Sci Univ Amsterdam 1994;18:65-76.

  76. Koitschev A, Waldmann B, Ptok M. Function and morphology of the larynx of the domestic guinea pig. An animal model for laryngologic and phoniatric research? HNO 1995;43:432-438.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Cir. 2002;70

ARTíCULOS SIMILARES

CARGANDO ...