Licea-Martínez JC

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 9
Paginas: 232-234
Archivo PDF: 213.62 Kb.

FRAGMENTO

La elección de la técnica anestésica del paciente quemado suele presentar un gran reto para el anestesiólogo, ya que éste se debe realizar con base en un conocimiento de las repercusiones fisiopatológicas de las quemaduras.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Blanchet B, et al. Influence of burns on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in the care of burn patients. Clin Pharmacokinetics. 2008;47:635-654.

2. Ansermino M, Hemsley C. ABC of burns intensive care management and control of infection. BMJ. 2004;329:220-223.

3. Sheridan RL, Weber JM. Mechanical and infectious complications of central venous cannulation in children: lessons learned from a 10-year experience placing more than 1,000 catheters. J Burn Care Res. 2006;27:713-718.

4. Jan YH, et al. Central venous catheter-related infection in major burn patients: comparison of subclavian vein and femoral vein. Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2011;26:245.

5. Latenser BA. Critical care of the burn patient: the first 48 hours. Crit Care Med.2009;37:2819-2826.

6. Woodson LC, Sherwood ER. Anesthesia for burned patients. In: Herndon DN. Total burn care. 2007: 196-223.

7. De Gasperi A, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile of the induction dose of propofol in patients with severe burns. Clin Drug Invn.1997;14:314-320.

8. Cancio LC, Cuenca PB, Walker SC. Total intravenous anesthesia for major burn surgery. Int J Burn Trauma. 2013;3:108-114.

9. Yamashita S, Kaneda K, Han TH. Population pharmacokinetics of a propofol bolus administered in patients with major burns. Burns.2010;36:1215-1221.