medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2017, Número 4

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

salud publica mex 2017; 59 (4)


Prevalencia de dificultades de funcionamiento y discapacidad en adolescentes mexicanas y sus características poblacionales

Allen-Leigh B, Hubert C, De Castro F, Villalobos A, Rojas R, Romero M, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Katz G, Lazcano-Ponce E

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 27
Paginas: 389-399
Archivo PDF: 274.79 Kb.


RESUMEN

Objetivo. Reportar la prevalencia de dificultades de funcionamiento y discapacidad entre mujeres adolescentes mexicanas de 15-17 años e identificar diferencias en características entre las que tienen tal condición y las que no. Material y métodos. Basado en la Encuesta Nacional de Niños, Niñas y Mujeres 2015, se estimaron prevalencias de problemas de funcionamiento y discapacidad y se exploró la relación con varias características con ji cuadrada y regresión logística. Resultados. El 11.1% de las mujeres adolescentes mexicanas de 15-17 años tuvieron dificultades de funcionamiento o discapacidad. El grupo de ámbitos de dificultades de funcionamiento y discapacidad con la mayor prevalencia fue socioemocional y comportamiento con 8.6%. Tener empleo, residencia rural y síntomas de depresión autoreportadas están asociadas con tener dificultades de funcionamiento y discapacidad. Conclusiones. Esta encuesta constituye un primer paso importante en la generación de datos sobre dificultades de funcionamiento y discapacidad en México, aunque se requiere estudiar el tema en muestras mayores.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Hosseinpoor AR, Stewart-Williams JA, Gautam J, Posarac A, Officer A, Verdes E, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in disability among adults: a multicountry study using the World Health Survey. Am J Public Health 2013;103(7):1278-1286. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301115

  2. World Health Organization, The World Bank. World Report on Disability. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2011.

  3. Charlton J. Nothing about us without us: disability, oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. https://doi. org/10.1525/california/9780520207950.001.0001

  4. Parmenter TR. The present, past and future of the study of intellectual disability: challenges in developing countries. Salud Publica Mex 2008;50(suppl 2):s124-s131. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036- 36342008000800004

  5. Oliver M. The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disability & Society 2013;28(7):1024-1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773

  6. Shakespeare T. Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge, 2006.

  7. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001.

  8. Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG). Understanding and Interpreting Disability as Measured using the WG Short Set of Questions. 2009 [accessed on October 5, 2016]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/data/washington_group/meeting8/interpreting_disability.pdf

  9. United Nations. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2006 [accessed on October 5, 2016]. Available at: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_ pdf.pdf

  10. Washington Group. Report of Ability of Countries to Disaggregate SDG Indicators by Disability. 2016 [accessed on October 5, 2016]. Available at: http://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ report_of_ability_of_countries_to_disaggregate_sdg_indicators_by_disability. pdf

  11. Loeb MA. White Paper on Disability Measurement. Journal for Disability and International Development 2012;1:4-11.

  12. Madans JH, Loeb ME, Altman BM. Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics. BMC Public Health 2011;11 (suppl 4):S4. https://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i6.8192

  13. Washington Group on Disability Statistics. 2014. WG/UNICEF Module on Child Functioning and Disability: Background [accessed on October 5, 2016]. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/washington_group/ meeting13/wg13_unicef_child_disability_background.pdf

  14. De Castro F, Rojas R, Villalobos A, Allen B, Hubert C, Romero M, et al. Bases metodológicas y resultados de la implementación de la Encuesta Nacional de Niños, Niñas y Mujeres en México 2015. Salud Publica Mex 2016;58(6):676-684. https://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i6.8192

  15. Madans JH, Loeb M. Methods to improve international comparability of census and survey measures of disability. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35(13):1070-1073. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.720353

  16. Mitra S, Sambamoorthi U. Disability prevalence among adults: estimates for 54 countries and progress toward a global estimate. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36(11):940-947. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.825333

  17. Mokdad AH, Forouzanfar MH, Daoud F, Mokdad AA, El Bcheraoui C, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors for young people’s health during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2016;387(10036):2383- 2401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00648-6

  18. Benjet C, Borges G, Méndez E, Albor Y, Casanova L, Orozco R, et al. Eight-year incidence of psychiatric disorders and service use from adolescence to early adulthood: longitudinal follow-up of the Mexican Adolescent Mental Health Survey. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016;25(2):163-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0721-5

  19. Darroch JE, Woog V, Bankole A, Ashford LS. Adding it up: costs and benefits of meeting the contraceptive needs of adolescents. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2016. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/ report/adding-it-meetingcontraceptive-needs-of-adolescents

  20. WHO. Making health services adolescent friendly. Developing national quality standards for adolescent friendly health services. Geneva: WHO, 2012.

  21. Chandra-Mouli V, McCarraher DR, Phillips SJ, Williamson NE, Hainsworth G. Contraception for adolescents in low and middle income countries: needs, barriers, and access. Reprod Health 2014;11(1):1. https:// doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-1

  22. Rojas R, de Castro F, Villalobos A, Allen-Leigh B, Romero M, Braverman- Bronstein A, Uribe P. Educación sexual integral: cobertura, homogeneidad, integralidad y continuidad en escuelas de México. Salud Publica Mex 2017;59(1):19-27. https://doi.org/10.21149/8411

  23. Wesselhoeft R, Sørensen MJ, Heiervang ER, Bilenberg N. Subthreshold depression in children and adolescents - a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2013;151(1):7-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.010

  24. Weersing VR, Jeffreys M, Do MT, Schwartz KT, Bolano C. Evidence base update of psychosocial treatments for child and adolescent depression. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2016:1-33.

  25. Werner-Seidler A, Perry Y, Calear AL, Newby JM, Christensen H. School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs for young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2017;51:30- 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.005

  26. De Castro F, Place JM, Allen-Leigh B, Rivera-Rivera L, Billings D. Provider report of the existence of detection and care of perinatal depression: quantitative evidence from public obstetric units in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex 2016;58(4):468-471. https://doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i4.8028

  27. Aberson C. Interpreting Null Results: Improving Presentation and Conclusions with Confidence Intervals. Journal for Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis 2002;1(3):36-42.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com