medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2018, Número 5

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

salud publica mex 2018; 60 (5)


Posicionamiento sobre los impuestos a alimentos no básicos densamente energéticos y bebidas azucaradas

Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Colchero MA, Sánchez-Romero LM, Batis C, Rivera-Dommarco J

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 43
Paginas: 586-591
Archivo PDF: 205.57 Kb.


RESUMEN

En 2014, el gobierno mexicano implementó una política fiscal para disminuir el consumo de bebidas azucaradas y alimentos no básicos con alta densidad energética. Este documento resume y analiza los estudios que han evaluado el impacto observado y esperado de los impuestos a alimentos y bebidas no saludables en México. La implementación de impuestos ha logrado disminuir las compras de bebidas azucaradas en 7.6% y alimentos no básicos con alta densidad energética en 7.4%. La reducción de consumo de bebidas azucaradas podría reducir la obesidad en 2.5%, prevenir 20 000 casos de enfermedad cardiovascular y 189 000 casos de diabetes al año 2022, así como prevenir 2 000 muertes. Además, se espera que estos impuestos ayuden a reducir en 1 173 millones de dólares los costos de atención a la salud. Los impuestos a alimentos no saludables deben fortalecerse y permanecer como parte integral de la estrategia nacional dirigida a reducir la obesidad y las enfermedades crónicas en México.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Gutiérrez J, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando-Hernández S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2012.

  2. Olaiz-Fernández G, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah Levy T, Villalpando- Hernández S, Hernández-Avila M, Sepulveda-Amor J. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición (Ensanut) 2006. Cuernavaca, Morelos México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2006.

  3. Ávila-Burgos L, Cahuana-Hurtado L, González-Domínguez D, eds. Cuentas en diabetes mellitus, enfermedades cardiovasculares y obesidad. Cuernavaca Morelos, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2009.

  4. Rtveladze K, Marsh T, Barquera S, Sanchez-Romero LM, Levy D, Melendez G, et al. Obesity prevalence in Mexico: impact on health and economic burden. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(1):233-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1368980013000086

  5. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres JP, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010;121(11):1356-64. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 109.876185

  6. Aburto TC, Pedraza LS, Sanchez-Pimienta TG, Batis C, Rivera JA. Discretionary foods have a high contribution and fruit, vegetables, and legumes have a low contribution to the total energy intake of the Mexican population. J Nutr. 2016;146(9):1881S-7S. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.219121

  7. H. Congreso de la Unión. Ley del Impuesto Especial sobre Producción y Servicios. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación, 11-12-2013.

  8. Mozaffarian D. Dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity: a comprehensive review. Circulation. 2016;133(2):187-225. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 115.018585

  9. Micha R, Shulkin ML, Penalvo JL, Khatibzadeh S, Singh GM, Rao M, et al. Etiologic effects and optimal intakes of foods and nutrients for risk of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from the Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group (NutriCoDE). PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175149. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0175149

  10. Johnson RK, Appel LJ, Brands M, Howard BV, Lefevre M, Lustig RH, et al. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;120(11):1011-20. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192627

  11. Imamura F, O’Connor L, Ye Z, Mursu J, Hayashino Y, Bhupathiraju SN, et al. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ. 2015;351:h3576. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3576

  12. Malik VS, Hu FB. Fructose and cardiometabolic health: what the evidence from sugar-sweetened beverages tells us. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(14):1615-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.025

  13. Stern D, Middaugh N, Rice MS, Laden F, Lopez-Ridaura R, Rosner B, et al. Changes in sugar-sweetened soda consumption, weight, and waist circumference: 2-year cohort of Mexican women. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(11):1801-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304008

  14. Singh GM, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Lim S, Ezzati M, Mozaffarian D, et al. Estimated global, regional, and national disease burdens related to sugarsweetened beverage consumption in 2010. Circulation. 2015;132(8):639- 66. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010636

  15. Schillinger D, Tran J, Mangurian C, Kearns C. Do Sugar-sweetened beverages cause obesity and diabetes? industry and the manufacture of scientific controversy. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(12):895-7. https://doi. org/10.7326/L16-0534

  16. Swinburn BA, Caterson I, Seidell JC, James WP. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of excess weight gain and obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(1A):123-46.

  17. Rodriguez-Monforte M, Sanchez E, Barrio F, Costa B, Flores-Mateo G. Metabolic syndrome and dietary patterns: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies. Eur J Nutr. 2017;56(3):925-47. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00394-016-1305-y

  18. Mu M, Xu LF, Hu D, Wu J, MJ. B. Dietary patterns and overweight/obesity: a review article. Iran J of Public Health. 2017;46(7):869-76. https://doi. org/PMC5563867

  19. Jannasch F, Kroger J, Schulze MB. Dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Nutr. 2017;147(6):1174-82. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.242552

  20. World Health Organization. Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. Ginebra: WHO, 2015 [citado noviembre 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/sugar_intake_information_ note_en.pdf?ua=1

  21. Pan American Health Organization. Plan of action for the prevention of obesity in children and adolescents. 66th Session of the Regional Committee of WHO for the Americas. Washington DC: PAHO, 2014.

  22. World Health Organization. Fiscal policies for diet and prevention of noncommunicable diseases: technical meeting report, 5-6 May 2015. Ginebra: WHO, 2016.

  23. Bakacs M, Vitrai J. Public health product tax in Hungary: An example of successful intersectoral action using a fiscal tool to promote healthier food choices and raise revenues for public health. Ginebra: WHO, 2015 [citado noviembre 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/ pdf_file/0004/287095/Good-practice-brief-public-health-product-tax-inhungary. pdf

  24. Berardi N, Sevestre P, Tepaut M, Vigneron A. The impact of a “soda tax” on prices. Evidence from French micro data. Applied Economics. 2016;48(41):3976-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1150946

  25. Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, McCulloch CE, Madsen KA. Impact of the berkeley excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(10):1865-71. https://doi. org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362

  26. Zhong Y, Auchincloss AH, Lee BK, Kanter GP. The short-term impacts of the Philadelphia beverage tax on beverage consumption. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(1):26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.02.017

  27. Silver LD, Ng SW, Ryan-Ibarra S, Taillie LS, Induni M, Miles DR, et al. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(4):e1002283. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283

  28. Heise TL, Katikireddi SV, Pega F, Gartlehner G, Fenton C, Griebler U, et al. Taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes. Cochra ne Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016(8):CD012319. https://doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD012319

  29. Mytton OT, Clarke D, Rayner M. Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health. BMJ. 2012;344:e2931. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2931

  30. Colchero MA, Guerrero-Lopez CM, Molina M, Rivera JA. Beverages sales in Mexico before and after Implementation of a Sugar Sweetened Beverage Tax. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163463. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0163463

  31. Colchero MA, Zavala JA, Batis C, Shamah-Levy T, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Cambios en los precios de bebidas y alimentos con impuestos en áreas rurales y semirrurales de México. Salud Publica Mex. 2017;59(2):137-46. https://doi.org/10.21149/7994

  32. Colchero MA, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin BM, Ng SW. In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(3):564-71. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231

  33. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;352:h6704. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6704

  34. Colchero MA, Molina M, Guerrero-Lopez CM. After Mexico implemented a tax, purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages decreased and water increased: difference by place of residence, household composition, and income level. J Nutr. 2017;147(8):1552-7. https://doi.org/10.3945/ jn.117.251892

  35. Batis C, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Taillie LS. First-year evaluation of Mexico’s Tax on nonessential energy-dense foods: an observational study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(7):e1002057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.1002057

  36. Taillie LS, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Batis C. Do high vs. low purchasers respond differently to a nonessential energy-dense food tax? Two-year evaluation of Mexico’s 8% nonessential food tax. Prev Med. 2017. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.009

  37. Sanchez-Romero LM, Penko J, Coxson PG, Fernandez A, Mason A, Moran AE, et al. Projected impact of Mexico’s sugar-sweetened beverage tax policy on diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a modeling study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(11):e1002158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002158

  38. Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Zepeda-Tello R, Rodrigues ER, Colchero-Aragones A, Rojas-Martinez R, Lazcano-Ponce E, et al. Expected population weight and diabetes impact of the 1-peso-per-litre tax to sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176336. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176336

  39. Chapa-Cantú J, Flores-Curiel D, Zúñiga Valero L. La industria de las bebidas no alcohólicas en México. Nuevo León, México: Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, 2015 [citado noviembre 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.economia.uanl.mx/ centro-de-investigaciones-economicas/consultori-a.html

  40. Guerrero-Lopez CM, Molina M, Colchero MA. Employment changes associated with the introduction of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and nonessential energy-dense food in Mexico. Prev Med. 2017;105S:S43- 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.001

  41. Backholer K, Beauchamp A, Ball K, Turrell G, Martin J, Woods J, et al. A framework for evaluating the impact of obesity prevention strategies on socioeconomic inequalities in weight. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(10):e43-e50. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302066

  42. Wright A, Smith KE, Hellowell M. Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):583. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z

  43. Shamah-Levy T, Ruiz-Matus C, Rivera-Dommarco J, Kuri-Morales P, Cuevas-Nasu L, Jiménez-Corona ME, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de Medio Camino 2016. Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2017.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com