Alvarez AG, Marcon SGT, Sriram IM, Schmitt J, de Andrade DF

Idioma: Portugués
Referencias bibliográficas: 24
Paginas: 624-636
Archivo PDF: 411.03 Kb.

RESUMEN

Introducción: El dolor es un problema de la salud pública mundial, y las lagunas en el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje sobre la evaluación del dolor contribuyen a esta situación. El desarrollo de estrategias innovadoras de enseñanza y aprendizaje, como objetos virtuales de aprendizaje, pueden colaborar para mejorar el cuidado de pacientes con dolor, siendo fundamental su evaluación en cuanto a calidad.
Objetivo: Analizar la calidad de objeto virtual de aprendizaje para la evaluación del dolor agudo en enfermería a partir del Learning Object Review Instrument 2.0.
Métodos: Investigación metodológica con enfoque cuantitativo. Participaron 5 enfermeros especialistas y 62 estudiantes de enfermería, que evaluaron las 9 variables del instrumento (1-Pésimo hasta 5-Excelente).
Resultados: Los resultados superaron el promedio objetivo (3-Bueno) entre estudiantes (4,27) y especialistas (4,31). Se destacaron entre estudiantes: "Conformidad con normas" (4,47±0,88) y "Presentación del proyecto" (4,55±0,74), entre los especialistas "Calidad del contenido" (4,80±0,45) y la "Reusabilidad" (4,80±0,45).
Conclusión: La nueva tecnología tiene calidad para aplicación en el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje en enfermería sobre la evaluación del dolor agudo. La tecnología es encarada por los participantes como un procedimiento educativo a ser incorporado en la vida académica y profesional, que colabora con el proceso de aprender a aprender, de modo flexible e interactivo.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Stang AS, Harting L, Fera C, Johnson, Ali S. Quality indicators for the assessment and management of pain in the emergency department: A systematic review. Pain Res Manag. 2014 [acesso 10 Mai 2016];19(6):179-90. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273718/

2. Duke G et al. Pain Management Knowledge and Attitudes of Baccalaureate Nursing Students and Faculty. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 [acesso 12 Jun 2017];14(1):11-9. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452522

3. Polomano RC, Dunwoody CJ, Krenzischek DA, Rathmell JP. Perspective on pain management in the 21st century. Journal of Peri Anesthesia Nursing. 2008 [acesso 20 Dez 2016];23(1):4-14. Disponível em: http://www.jopan.org/article/S1089-9472(07)00324-3/fulltext

4. Alvarez AG, Sasso GTM, Iyengar MS. Persuasive technology in teaching acute pain assessment in nursing: results in learning based on pre and post-testing. Nurse Education Today. 2017 [acesso 10 Mai 2016];50:109-14. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691716303215

5. Schibeci R, Lake D, Phillips R, Lowe K, Cummings R, Miller E. Evaluating the use of learning objects in Australian and New Zealand schools. Computers & Education. 2008 [acesso 20 Jun 2016];50(1):271-83. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131506001047

6. Garci'a-Barriocanal E, Sicilia M, Lytras M. Evaluating pedagogical classification frameworks for learning objects: a case study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2007 [acesso 15 Dez 2016];23(6):2641-55. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563206000951

7. Góes FSN, Camargo RAA, Fonseca LMM, Oliveira GF, Hara CYN, Felipe HR, et al. Assessment of the digital education technology "vital signs and anatomy" by students of vocational nursing education. Rev Min Enferm. 2015 [acesso 15 Dez 2016];19(2):37-43. Disponível em: http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/1004

8. Braga CSR, Andrade EMLR, Luz MHBA, Monteiro AKC, Campos MOOB, Silva FMS, et al. Construction and validation of a virtual learning object on intestinal elimination stoma. Invest Educ Enferm. 2016 [acesso 12 Dez 2016];34(1):120-7. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-53072016000100014

9. Almeida SRW, Sasso GTMD, Barra DCC. Computerized nursing process in the Intensive Care Unit: ergonomics and usability. Rev. esc. enferm. USP. 2016 [acesso 12 Dez 2016];50(6):998-1004. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342016000600998&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

10. Dixon JL, Mukhopadhyay D, Hunt J, Jupiter D, Smythe WR, Papaconstantinou HT. Enhancing surgical safety using digital multimedia technology. Am J Surg. 2016 [acesso 20 Ago 2016];211(6):1095-8. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002-9610(15)00553-X

11. Tamashiro LMC, Peres HHC. Development and assessment of learning objects about intramuscular medication administration. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2014 [acesso 10 Nov 2016];22(5):716-23. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692014000500716

12. Carvalho LR, Évora YDM, Zem-Mascarenhas SH. Assessment of the usability of a digital learning technology prototype for monitoring intracranial pressure. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2016 [acesso 15 Dez 2016];24:e2777. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100401

13. Aredes NDA, Góes FSN, Silva MAI, Gonçalves MFC, Fonseca LMM. Digital object in neonatal nursing: impact on student learning. Rev. Eletr. Enf. 2015 [acesso 10 Dez 2016];17(4):1-10. Disponível em: https://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v17/n4/pdf/v17n4a10-en.pdf

14. Fonseca LMM, Aredes NDA, Dias DMV, Scochi CGSS, Martins JCA, Rodrigues MA. Serious game e-Baby: nursing students' perception on learning about preterm newborn clinical assessment. Rev Bras Enferm. 2015 [acesso 25 Jan 2017];68(1):13-9. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672015000100013

15. Fogg BJ, Eckles D. (eds.). Mobile Persuasion: 20 perspectives on the future of behavior change. Stanford: Stanford Captology Media; 2007.

16. Barbosa SFF, Marin HF. Web-based simulation: a tool for teaching critical care nursing. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2009 [acesso 10 Mai 2016];17(1):7-13. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692009000100002

17. Nesbit J, Belfer K, Leacock T. Learning Object Instrument Review (LORI 2.0) - user manual. 2009 [acesso 20 Fev 2016]. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/7927907/Learning_Object_Review_Instrument_LORI_

18. Filatro A. Contextual Instrucional Design. São Paulo: Senac; 2010.

19. Walsh A. The tutor in problem based learning: a novice's guide. Hamilton: McMaster University; 2005.

20. Laurence J, Alcock D, McGrath P, Kay J, MacMurray SB, Dulgerg C, et al. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Network. 1993 [acesso 20 Fev 2016];12:59-66. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8413140

21. Payen JF, Bru O, Bosson JL, Lagrasta A, Novel E, Deschaux I, et al. Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patient by using a behavioral pain scale. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(12):2258-63. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11801819

22. Trindade CS, Dahmer Alessandra, Reppold CT. Objetos de aprendizagem: uma revisão integrativa na área da saúde. J. Health Inform. 2014 [acesso 10 Dez 2016];6(1):20-9. Disponível em: http://www.jhi-sbis.saude.ws/ojs-jhi/index.php/jhi-sbis/article/view/300

23. Smith SJ, Roehrs CJ. High-fidelity simulation: factor correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 [acesso 10 Dez 2016];30(2):74-8. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476068

24. Fernandes LS, Raabe ALA, Benitti FBV. Educational software interface: graphic design challenges. Congresso Brasileiro de Computação. Itajaí: Univali; 2004.