medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2961 (Print)

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cuba Enf 2018; 34 (3)

Quality analysis of the virtual learning object for nursing pain assessment

Alvarez AG, Marcon SGT, Sriram IM, Schmitt J, de Andrade DF

Language: Portugu?s
References: 24
Page: 624-636
PDF size: 411.03 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pain is a global public health concern, a situation to which gaps in the teaching and learning process of pain assessment contribute. Developing innovative teaching and learning strategies, as virtual learning objects, can help improve the care of patients with pain, being fundamental their quality-based assessment.
Objective: To analyze the quality of the virtual learning object for acute pain assessment in nursing based on the Learning Object Review Instrument 2.0.
Methods: Methodological research with a quantitative approach. Five specialized nurses and 62 nursing students participated, who evaluated the nine variables of the instrument (1-poor to 5-excellent).
Results: The results exceeded the expected average (3-good) between students (4.27) and specialists (4.31). The following stood out among students:conformity to standards (4.47±0.88) and project presentation (4.55±0.74); and the ones that stood out among specialists were content quality (4.80 ± 0.45) and reusability (4.80 ± 0.45).
Conclusion: The new technology has the quality to be used in the teaching and learning process in nursing for acute pain assessment. Technology is faced by the participants as an educational procedure to be incorporated into the academic and professional life, which collaborates with the process of learning to learn, in a flexible and interactive way.


REFERENCES

  1. Stang AS, Harting L, Fera C, Johnson, Ali S. Quality indicators for the assessment and management of pain in the emergency department: A systematic review. Pain Res Manag. 2014 [acesso 10 Mai 2016];19(6):179-90. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273718/

  2. Duke G et al. Pain Management Knowledge and Attitudes of Baccalaureate Nursing Students and Faculty. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 [acesso 12 Jun 2017];14(1):11-9. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452522

  3. Polomano RC, Dunwoody CJ, Krenzischek DA, Rathmell JP. Perspective on pain management in the 21st century. Journal of Peri Anesthesia Nursing. 2008 [acesso 20 Dez 2016];23(1):4-14. Disponível em: http://www.jopan.org/article/S1089-9472(07)00324-3/fulltext

  4. Alvarez AG, Sasso GTM, Iyengar MS. Persuasive technology in teaching acute pain assessment in nursing: results in learning based on pre and post-testing. Nurse Education Today. 2017 [acesso 10 Mai 2016];50:109-14. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691716303215

  5. Schibeci R, Lake D, Phillips R, Lowe K, Cummings R, Miller E. Evaluating the use of learning objects in Australian and New Zealand schools. Computers & Education. 2008 [acesso 20 Jun 2016];50(1):271-83. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131506001047

  6. Garci'a-Barriocanal E, Sicilia M, Lytras M. Evaluating pedagogical classification frameworks for learning objects: a case study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2007 [acesso 15 Dez 2016];23(6):2641-55. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563206000951

  7. Góes FSN, Camargo RAA, Fonseca LMM, Oliveira GF, Hara CYN, Felipe HR, et al. Assessment of the digital education technology "vital signs and anatomy" by students of vocational nursing education. Rev Min Enferm. 2015 [acesso 15 Dez 2016];19(2):37-43. Disponível em: http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/1004

  8. Braga CSR, Andrade EMLR, Luz MHBA, Monteiro AKC, Campos MOOB, Silva FMS, et al. Construction and validation of a virtual learning object on intestinal elimination stoma. Invest Educ Enferm. 2016 [acesso 12 Dez 2016];34(1):120-7. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-53072016000100014

  9. Almeida SRW, Sasso GTMD, Barra DCC. Computerized nursing process in the Intensive Care Unit: ergonomics and usability. Rev. esc. enferm. USP. 2016 [acesso 12 Dez 2016];50(6):998-1004. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342016000600998&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

  10. Dixon JL, Mukhopadhyay D, Hunt J, Jupiter D, Smythe WR, Papaconstantinou HT. Enhancing surgical safety using digital multimedia technology. Am J Surg. 2016 [acesso 20 Ago 2016];211(6):1095-8. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002-9610(15)00553-X

  11. Tamashiro LMC, Peres HHC. Development and assessment of learning objects about intramuscular medication administration. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2014 [acesso 10 Nov 2016];22(5):716-23. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692014000500716

  12. Carvalho LR, Évora YDM, Zem-Mascarenhas SH. Assessment of the usability of a digital learning technology prototype for monitoring intracranial pressure. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2016 [acesso 15 Dez 2016];24:e2777. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692016000100401

  13. Aredes NDA, Góes FSN, Silva MAI, Gonçalves MFC, Fonseca LMM. Digital object in neonatal nursing: impact on student learning. Rev. Eletr. Enf. 2015 [acesso 10 Dez 2016];17(4):1-10. Disponível em: https://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v17/n4/pdf/v17n4a10-en.pdf

  14. Fonseca LMM, Aredes NDA, Dias DMV, Scochi CGSS, Martins JCA, Rodrigues MA. Serious game e-Baby: nursing students' perception on learning about preterm newborn clinical assessment. Rev Bras Enferm. 2015 [acesso 25 Jan 2017];68(1):13-9. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672015000100013

  15. Fogg BJ, Eckles D. (eds.). Mobile Persuasion: 20 perspectives on the future of behavior change. Stanford: Stanford Captology Media; 2007.

  16. Barbosa SFF, Marin HF. Web-based simulation: a tool for teaching critical care nursing. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2009 [acesso 10 Mai 2016];17(1):7-13. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692009000100002

  17. Nesbit J, Belfer K, Leacock T. Learning Object Instrument Review (LORI 2.0) - user manual. 2009 [acesso 20 Fev 2016]. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/7927907/Learning_Object_Review_Instrument_LORI_

  18. Filatro A. Contextual Instrucional Design. São Paulo: Senac; 2010.

  19. Walsh A. The tutor in problem based learning: a novice's guide. Hamilton: McMaster University; 2005.

  20. Laurence J, Alcock D, McGrath P, Kay J, MacMurray SB, Dulgerg C, et al. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Network. 1993 [acesso 20 Fev 2016];12:59-66. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8413140

  21. Payen JF, Bru O, Bosson JL, Lagrasta A, Novel E, Deschaux I, et al. Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patient by using a behavioral pain scale. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(12):2258-63. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11801819

  22. Trindade CS, Dahmer Alessandra, Reppold CT. Objetos de aprendizagem: uma revisão integrativa na área da saúde. J. Health Inform. 2014 [acesso 10 Dez 2016];6(1):20-9. Disponível em: http://www.jhi-sbis.saude.ws/ojs-jhi/index.php/jhi-sbis/article/view/300

  23. Smith SJ, Roehrs CJ. High-fidelity simulation: factor correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 [acesso 10 Dez 2016];30(2):74-8. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19476068

  24. Fernandes LS, Raabe ALA, Benitti FBV. Educational software interface: graphic design challenges. Congresso Brasileiro de Computação. Itajaí: Univali; 2004.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com