García MX, Palomino PVI, Rodríguez-Chávez JA, Pomar CG, Flores-Ledesma A

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 1025-1029
PDF size: 209.03 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the amount of distal movement of the canine using micro-osteoperforations (MOP's) as a method of acceleration of treatment. Materials and methods: Canine maxillary retraction was evaluated for 5 consecutive weeks in 7 patients who required bilateral extractions, they were divided into a control group (right side) and an experimental group (left side). The control group without MOP's and the experimental group with 3 MOP's at the extraction site. The distalization protocol was carried out using an open chain with a force of 150gr, from the distal fins of the canine to a mini-implant used as total anchorage. Results: It was found that at 5 weeks the experimental group presents a space closure of 1.23±0.56mm and the control group of 1.34±0.73mm. For the closure percentage, the experimental group presents a percentage of 18.18±8.55% and the control group of 19.93±10.60%. In no case were statistically significant differences found, Student's T p› 0.05. Conclusions: No more rapid distalization was performed on the side of the MOPs, so the use of microperforations requires new studies with a greater number of samples as well as evaluating the closure of spaces in a longer time.

REFERENCES

1. Proffit WR. Ortodoncia Contemporánea, Teoría y Práctica. 3ra ed. España: Harcourt, 2001.

2. Teixeira C, Khoo E, Tran J. Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. Journal Dental Reserch 2010;89(10):1135-41.

3. Nanda R. Biomecánicas y Estética, Estrategias en Ortodoncia Clínica. 1ra ed. Amolca, 2007.

4. Stober B, Genestra V, Molina C, Puigdollers P. La corticotomía alveolar selectiva como coadyuvante al tratamiento de ortodoncia: revisión de la literatura. Rev Esp Ortod. 2010;(40):215-30.

5. Zawawi HK. Patient’s acceptance of corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. Dovepress 2015;9:1153-58

6. Douglas OD, Oliveira BF, Villamarim SR. Alveolar corticotomies in orthodontics: indications and effects on tooth movement. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2010;15(4):144-57

7. Cho KW, Cho SW, Oh CO, Ryu YK, Ohshima H, Jung HS. The effect of cortical activation on orthodontic tooth movement. Authors Journal Compilation. 2007;13: 314-19.

8. Graber, Vanarsdall, Vig, Huang. Orthodonthics current principles and techniques. 6th ed. Elsevier, 2017.

9. Aristizábal JF. Accelerated orthodontics and express transit orthodontics (ETO) a contemporary concept. Revista CES Odontologia 2014;27(1):56-73.

10. Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144(5):639-48.

11. Alikhani M, Alansari S, Sangsuwon C, et al. Micro-osteoperforations: Minimally invasive accelerated tooth movement. Seminars in Orthodontics 2015;21(3):162-169.

12. Rody WJ, Wijegunasinghe M, Wiltshire WA, Dufault B. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(1):120-26.

13. Shenava Sh, Nayak K, Bhaskar V, Nayak A. Accelerated Orthodontics a review. International Journal of Scientific Study 2014;1(5):35-39.

14. Faraji M, Izquierdo Camacho MA, Tavira Fernandez S, Flores-Ledesma A, Hernandez Hernandez C. Tratamiento ortodóntico acelerado periodontalmente: comparación de técnicas quirúrgicas. Rev Mex Periodontol 2014; 5(1): 30-35

15. Hoogeveen E, Jansma J, Ren Yijin. Surgically facilitated orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014; 145(4): S51-64.

16. Gkantidis N, Mistakidis I, Kouskoura T, Pandis N. Effectiveness of non-conventional methods for accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry 2014;42:1300-1319.

17. Tsai C, Yang T, Hsieh H, Yang L. Comparison of the effects of micro-osteoperforation and corticision on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Angle Orthod. 2016; 86(4): 558-564.