medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Estomatología

ISSN 1561-297X (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Estomatol 2020; 57 (2)

In vitro evaluation of the microhardness and porosity of two photopolymerizable composite resins

Bezerra SC, de Andrande DEL, Barbosa SF, Rodrigues VB, Cruz AJH, Mangueira RM, Diniz MMLA, Tenorio GGM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Portugu?s
References: 19
Page:
PDF size: 343.79 Kb.


Key words:

dentistry, dental materials, hardness tests, x-ray microtomography.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Scientific studies about the physical and mechanical properties of composite resins are increasingly needed in view of the wide variety of products available in the market today, resulting from the increase in their demand for dental care purposes, with a preference for minimally invasive preparations aimed at restoring the esthetic and functional characteristics of the treated element. Objective: Evaluate and compare the microhardness and porosity of the photopolymerizable composite resins Filtek Z350 XT and Zirconfill Technew. Methods: Ten test bodies were developed per sample (n= 10) and subjected to Vickers microhardness and porosity testing by computerized microtomography. Results: With respect to the presence of porosity, expressed in percentages, the Filtek group had the lowest mean values. When compared statistically, the two groups showed a statistical difference (p= 0.019) with a high effect magnitude. Regarding microhardness, the Filtek group had the highest mean values. Statistical comparison did not find any difference between the groups (p> 0.05). Conclusions: Porosity was significantly different in the groups studied, the Filtek Z350XT group exhibiting the lowest percentage. However, the groups did not show any statistical difference concerning microhardness, despite the fact that the Filtek Z350XT group had a higher mean value.


REFERENCES

  1. Diegues MA, Marques E, Miyamotto PAR, Penteado MM. Cerâmica X Resina Composta: o que utilizar? Rev Uningá. 2017 [acceso 24/05/2019];51(1):87-94. Disponible en: http://revista.uninga.br/index.php/uninga/article/view/1329/947

  2. Zavanelli AC, Zavanelli RA, Mazaro JVQ, Paula WN, Borges MAD, Bagio DM. Associação de preparos minimamente invasivos e plástica gengival: relato de caso clínico. ArchHealth Invest. 2015 [acceso 24/05/2019];4(3):1-9. Disponible en: http://www.archhealthinvestigation.com.br/ArcHI/article/view/895/1181

  3. Vieira APSB, Santos TKGL, Carvalho LGA, Patricio CEG, Galvão AKC, Silveira BC. Diferença de cor entre resinas compostas de lotes diferentes de acordo com a escala vita. Rev Campo do Saber. 2018 [acceso 24/05/2019];4(5):86-100. Disponible en: http://periodicos.iesp.edu.br/index.php/campodosaber/article/view/170/147

  4. Januário MVS, Santos JSJ, Silva EL, Vasconselos MG, Vasconselos RG. Acabamento e Polimento das restaurações de amálgama e resina composta: conceitos práticos e fundamentos clínicos. Salusvita. 2016 [acceso 24/05/2019];35(4):563-78. Disponible en: https://secure.usc.br/static/biblioteca/salusvita/salusvita_v35_n4_2016_art_09.pdf

  5. Zirconfill. Technew. Rio de Janeiro: Technew Comércio e Indústria Ltda, 2015.

  6. Andreiuolo R, Gonçalves AS, Dias KRHC. A Zircônia na Odontologia Restauradora. Rev BrasOdontol. 2011 [acceso 24/05/2019];68(1):49-53. Disponible en: http://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/251/218

  7. Almeida MLD. Avaliação in vitro da resistência de duas resinas compostas submetidas a teste de compressão.50 f, TCC (Graduação) - Curso de Odontologia. Universidade Federal de Campina Grande. 2018.

  8. Beher M, Proff P, Kollbeck C, Langriegr S, Kunze J, Handel G. The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using diferente bonding concepts. J Mech Behav Miomed Mater. 2011 [acceso 24/05/2019];4(1):2-8. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.08.002

  9. Dalcin GS, Gallas KR, Ribeiro ES. Avaliação da dureza Vickers de resinas tipo Bulk Fill: estudo in vitro. Stomatos. 2018 [acceso 24/05/2019];24(47):29-41. Disponible en :http://www.periodicos.ulbra.br/index.php/stomatos/article/view/4205/3352

  10. Vieira JIN, Lucena EES, Seabra EJG, Dutra LC. Influência da técnica de inserção da resina composta odontológica na lisura superficial da restauração. Rev Odontol Bras Central. 2017 [acceso 24/05/2019];26(79):52-56. Disponible en: http://www.robrac.org.br/seer/index.php/ROBRAC/article/view/936/936

  11. Cochard H, Delzon S, Badel E. X-ray microtomography (micro-CT): a reference technology for high-resolution quantification of xylem embolism in trees. Plant Cell Environ. 2015 [acceso 24/05/2019];38(1):201-06. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pce.12391

  12. Lakatos EM, Marconi MA. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas; 2003 [acceso 24/05/2019] Disponible en: http://www.academia.edu/download/37231656/LAKATOS_-_MARCONI_-_FUNDAMENTOS_DE_METODOLOGIA_CIENTIFICA.pdf

  13. Vieira BR, Firmino BO, Medeiros MID, Santos RL, Guênes GMT, Carvalho FG. In vitro Effect of Erosive Challenge on Surface Microhardness of Orthodontic Composites. Bras. Odontopediatira Clín. Integr. (Online). 2016 [acceso 24/05/2019];16(1):48-50. Disponible en: http://revista.uepb.edu.br/index.php/pboci/article/view/2802/pdf

  14. Field A. Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. Porto Alegre: Artmed. 2009 [acceso 24/05/2019]. Disponible en: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4320753/mod_resource/content/1/2011_Field%20%28completo%29Descobrindo%20a%20estati%CC%81stica%20com%20SPSS.pdf

  15. Reis AC, Panzeri H. Caracterização microestrutural e análise do desempenho de uma resina composta condesável submetida à condensação manual e mecânica. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 2000 [acceso 24/05/2019]. Disponible en: https://bdpi.usp.br/item/001210533

  16. Schneider AC, Mendonça MJ, Rodrigues RB, Busato PMR, Camilotti V. Influência de três modos de fotopolimerização sobre a microdureza de três resinas compostas. Rev Polímeros. 2016[ acceso 24/05/2019];26(1):37-42. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-14282016000700006&lng=pt&tlng=pt

  17. Souza JOA, Michida SMA, Zogheib LV, Lombardo GHL, Pereira PC, Barca DC, et al. Avaliação da dureza Vickers de Resinas Compostas de uso direto e indireto. Ciênc Odontol Bras. 2009 [acceso 24/05/2019];12(1):23-30. Disponible en: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/249/189

  18. Irie MS, Rabelo GD, Spin-Neto R, Dechichi P, Borges JS, Soares PBF. Uso de tomografia computadorizada para avaliação óssea em odontologia. Braz Dent J. 2018 [acceso 24/05/2019];29(3):227-38. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000300227&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

  19. Leite KVM, Kinder GR, Cunha LF, Correr GM, Gonzaga CC, Domingues RS. Zircônia e resina composta nanoparticulada em dentes anteriores: relato de caso clínico. RSBO (Online). 2018 [acceso 24/05/2019];15(1):60-65. Disponible en: http://periodicos.univille.br/index.php/rsbo/article/view/591/508




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2020;57