medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2021; 35 (2)

Quantitative classification of pivot-shift maneuver

Berumen-Nafarrate E, Carmona-González J, Tonche-Ramos J, Carmona-Máynez O, Aguirre-Madrid A, Reyes-Conn R, Ramos-Moctezuma I, Sigala-González L, Quintana-Trejo F, Moreno-Brito V, Leal-Berumen I
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/101858

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/101858
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/101858

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 153-157
PDF size: 181.72 Kb.


Key words:

Cruciate ligament, measurement, instability, diagnosis, classification.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The diagnosis of ACL injury is established with the physical examination that includes the Lachman maneuver and the pivot-shift test since it has the highest positive predictive value. Imaging tests such as MRI are still used for confirmation of the same; so the quantification of clinical maneuvers is sought. Material and methods: Prospective clinical study in which the maneuvers of pivot-shift and Lachman are quantified for later classification. Results: Of 36 patients, 64% found a range between 0 and 3 mm when subtracting the value of the affected knee from the value of the healthy knee. It was found that 28% of the patients recorded values of KT-1000 ranging between 4 and 6 mm of displacement. In 8% of the total patients, values of KT-1000 were found that exceeded 7 mm of displacement. The data obtained are normalized and classified into 3 degrees of injury: grade 1 with partial injury; grade 2 with complete anteromedial and partial injury in posterolateral bundle; grade 3 with complete injury of both bundles. Conclusion: A classification is proposed for the degrees of ACL injury with future application to a more personalized reconstruction.


REFERENCES

  1. Hughston JC, Andrews JR, Cross MJ, Moschi A. Classification of knee ligament instabilities. Part I. The medical compartment and cruciate ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(2): 159-72. Available in: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197658020-00001

  2. Aoyama JT, Lowe J, Capraro AC, Wells L. Clinical evaluation of ACL tear. The pediatric anterior cruciate ligament: evaluation and management strategies, 2017; 41-47. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64771-5_6

  3. Musahl V, Karlsson J. Anterior cruciate ligament tear. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(24): 2341-8. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1805931

  4. Garín ZD, Reyes PE, Penagos PA. Lesión del ligamento cruzado anterior. Opciones actuales de tratamiento en el deportista. Orthotips. 2016; 12(2): 88-95.

  5. Guía de Práctica Clínica, Manejo de las lesiones ligamentarias traumáticas en rodilla. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2009.

  6. Berumen-Nafarrate E, Tonche-Ramos J, Carmona-González J, Leal-Berumen I, Vega-Nájera CA, Díaz-Arriaga JM, Espinoza-Sánchez MA, Aguirre-Madrid A. Interpretación de la maniobra de pivote mediante el uso de acelerómetros en pacientes que acuden a consulta ortopédica. Acta Ortop Mex. 2015; 29(3): 176-81.

  7. Miller CD, Hogan MV, Miller MD. Bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction. Master techniques in Orthpaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine Freddie Fu; 2010, Capitulo 26, 301-312.

  8. Mae T, Shino K, Hiramatsu K, Tachibana Y, Nakagawa S, Yoshikawa H. Anterior laxity of the knee assessed with gravity stress radiograph. Skeletal Radiol. 2018; 47(10): 1349-55. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2941-5

  9. Hooda A, Dhillon MS, Prabhakar S, Prakash M, John R, Kanwat H. MRI evaluation of anterolateral ligament tears in knee injury with anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. 2018; 8(1): 23-7. Available in: https://doi.org/10.11138/mltj/2018.8.1.023

  10. Kircher J. Editorial commentary: the measurement of knee laxity: instrumented measurement and stress radiography for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2019; 35(6): 1733-5. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.015

  11. Arcuri F, Abalo E, Barclay F. Uso de escores para evaluación de resultados en cirugía del ligamento cruzado anterior. Artroscopia. 2010; 17(3): 241-7.

  12. Hambly K, Griva K, IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients? Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36(9): 1695-704.

  13. Huang W, Zhang Y, Yao Z, Ma L. Clinical examination of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016; 50(1): 22-31.

  14. Bernard R, Bach Jr, Provencher MT, ACL surgery: how to get it right the first time and what to do if it fails. J Sports Sci Med. 2010; 9(3): 527. Available in: https://www.jssm.org/ Base de datos.

  15. Kean BT, Burks RT. Diagnostic and surgical decision ACL tears. In: Bonnin M, Amendola A, Bellemans J, MacDonald S, Ménétrey J, editors. The knee joint: surgical techniques and strategies. [Internet]. Paris: Springer Paris; 2012. p. 151-61.

  16. Kuroda R, Hoshino Y. Electromagnetic tracking of the pivot-shift. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(2): 164-9. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9335-x

  17. Slichter ME, Wolterbeek N, Auw Yang KG, Zijl JAC, Piscaer TM. A novel test for assessment of anterolateral rotatory instability of the knee: the tibial internal rotation test (TIR test). J Exp Orthop. 2018; 5(1): 29. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-018-0141-9

  18. Getgood A, Bryant D, Firth A. The stability study: a protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without lateral extra-articular tenodesis in individuals who are at high risk of graft failure. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1): 1-11. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2589-x

  19. Chung JH, Ryu KJ, Lee DH, Yoon KH, Park YW, Kim HJ, Kim JH. An analysis of normative data on the knee rotatory profile and the usefulness of the Rotatometer, a new instrument for measuring tibiofemoral rotation: the reliability of the knee Rotatometer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23(9): 2727-33. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3039-9

  20. Ferretti A, Monaco E, Fabbri M, Maestri B, De Carli A. Prevalence and classification of injuries of anterolateral complex in acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthroscopy 2017; 33(1): 147-54. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.010

  21. Tanaka T, Hoshino Y, Miyaji N, Ibaragi K, Nishida K, Nishizawa Y, et al. The diagnostic reliability of the quantitative pivot-shift evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency was superior to those of the accelerometer and iPad image analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(9): 2835-40. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4734-0

  22. Wheeless CR. Wheeless textbook in orthopaedics. 2016.

  23. During NL, Lateral S, Sprain A, Weimar WH, State M. Note : This article will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. The article appears here in its accepted, peer-reviewed form, as it was provided by the submitting author. It has not been copyedited, proofed, or formatted by the publisher. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2019.

  24. Murgier J, Béranger JS, Boisrenoult P, Steltzlen C, Pujol N. Prospective comparative study of knee laxity with four different methods in anterior cruciate ligament tears. International Orthopaedics. 2018; 42(8): 1845-51. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3791-4

  25. Svantesson E, Hamrin SE, Martensson J, Zaffagnini S, Kuroda R, Musahl V, et al. Static anteroposterior knee laxity tests are poorly correlated to quantitative pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee: a prospective multicentre study. Journal of ISAKOS: Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. 2018; 3(2): 83-8. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2017-000196

  26. Alqahtani Y, Murgier J, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P, Steltzlen C, Pujol N. Anterior tibial laxity using the GNRB® device in healthy knees. Knee. 2018; 25(1): 34-9. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2017.03.004

  27. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Naendrup JH, Soni A, Olsen A, Zlotnicki J, Musahl V. Knee instability scores for ACL reconstruction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(2): 170-7. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9339-6

  28. Sundemo D, Blom A, Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Lopomo NF, Zaffagnini S, Samuelsson K. Correlation between quantitative pivot shift and generalized joint laxity: a prospective multicenter study of ACL ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(8): 2362-70. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4785-2

  29. Marchand JB, Ruiz N, Coupry A, Bowen M, Robert H. Do graft diameter or patient age influence the results of ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(9): 2998-3004. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3608-6

  30. Fanelli GC, Orcutt DR, Edson CJ. The multiple-ligament injured knee: evaluation, treatment, and results. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(4): 471-86.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

IV




Table 1
Table 2
Table 3

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2021 Mar-Abr;35